A Comparison of Linear-Mode and Single-Photon Airborne LiDAR in Species-Specific Forest Inventories

Single-photon airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems provide high-density data from high flight altitudes. We compared single-photon and linear-mode airborne LiDAR for the prediction of species-specific volumes in boreal coniferous-dominated forests. The LiDAR data sets were acquired at different flight altitudes using Leica SPL100 (single-photon, 17 points · m⁻²), Riegl VQ-1560i (linear-mode, 11 points · m⁻²), and Leica ALS60 (linear-mode, 0.6 points · m⁻²) LiDAR systems. Volumes were predicted at the plot-level using Gaussian process regression with predictor variables extracted from the LiDAR data sets and aerial images. Our findings showed that the Leica SPL100 produced a greater mean root-mean-squared error (RMSE) value (41.7 m³ · ha⁻¹) than the Leica ALS60 (39.3 m³ · ha⁻¹) in the prediction of species-specific volumes. Correspondingly, the Riegl VQ-1560i (mean RMSE = 33.0 m³ · ha⁻¹) outperformed both the Leica ALS60 and the Leica SPL100. We found that the cumulative distributions of the first echo heights > 1.3 m were rather similar among the data sets, whereas the last echo distributions showed larger differences. We conclude that the Leica SPL100 data set is suitable for area-based LiDAR inventory by tree species although the prediction errors are greater than with data obtained using the modern linear-mode LiDAR, such as Riegl VQ-1560i.publishedVersionPeer reviewe

Bayesian estimation of seasonal course of canopy leaf area index from hyperspectral satellite data

In this paper, Bayesian inversion of a physically-based forest reflectance model is investigated to estimate of boreal forest canopy leaf area index (LAI) from EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data. The data consist of multiple forest stands with different species compositions and structures, imaged in three phases of the growing season. The Bayesian estimates of canopy LAI are compared to reference estimates based on a spectral vegetation index. The forest reflectance model contains also other unknown variables in addition to LAI, for example leaf single scattering albedo and understory reflectance. In the Bayesian approach, these variables are estimated simultaneously with LAI. The feasibility and seasonal variation of these estimates is also examined. Credible intervals for the estimates are also calculated and evaluated. The results show that the Bayesian inversion approach is significantly better than using a comparable spectral vegetation index regression.Peer reviewe

Bayesian inversion of a forest reflectance model using Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 satellite images

| openaire: EC/H2020/771049/EU//FREEDLESThe inversion of reflectance models is a generalizable tool to obtain estimates on forest biophysical parameters, such as leaf area index, with theoretically little information need from a study area, instead relying on the knowledge about physical processes in the forest radiation regime. The use of prior information can greatly improve the reflectance model inversion, however, the literature does not yet provide much information on the selection of priors and their influence on the inversion results. In this study, we used a Bayesian approach to invert the PARAS forest reflectance model and retrieve leaf area index from Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat 8 OLI multispectral satellite images. The PARAS model is based on the theory of spectral invariants, which describes the influence of wavelength-independent parameters on forest radiative transfer. The Bayesian inversion approach is highly flexible, provides uncertainty quantification, and enables the explicit incorporation of prior knowledge into the inversion process. We found that the choice of prior information is crucial in inverting a forest reflectance model to predict leaf area index. Regularizing and informative priors for leaf area index strongly improved the predictions, relative to an uninformative prior, in that they counteracted the saturation effect of the optical signal occuring at high values for leaf area index. The predictions of leaf area index were more accurate for Landsat 8 than for Sentinel-2, due to potential inconsistencies in the visible bands of Sentinel-2 in our data, and the higher spectral resolution. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Peer reviewe

Gaussian Process Regression for Airborne Laser Scanning Based Forest Inventory: Validation and Parameter Selection

104981003Academy of Finlan

Estimation of boreal forest biomass from ICESat-2 data using hierarchical hybrid inference

The ICESat-2, launched in 2018, carries the ATLAS instrument, which is a photon-counting spaceborne lidar that provides strip samples over the terrain. While primarily designed for snow and ice monitoring, there has been a great interest in using ICESat-2 to predict forest above-ground biomass density (AGBD). As ICESat-2 is on a polar orbit, it provides good spatial coverage of boreal forests. The aim of this study is to evaluate the estimation of mean AGBD from ICESat-2 data using a hierarchical modeling approach combined with rigorous statistical inference. We propose a hierarchical hybrid inference approach for uncertainty quantification of the AGBD estimated from ICESat-2 lidar strips. Our approach models the errors coming from the multiple modeling steps, including the allometric models used for predicting tree-level AGB. For testing the procedure, we have data from two adjacent study sites, denoted Valtimo and Nurmes, of which Valtimo site is used for model training and Nurmes for validation. The ICESat-2 estimated mean AGBD in the Nurmes validation area was 63.2$\pm$1.9 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 2.9%). The local reference hierarchical model-based estimate obtained from wall-to-wall airborne lidar data was 63.9$\pm$0.6 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 1.0%). The reference estimate was within the 95% confidence interval of the ICESat-2 hierarchical hybrid estimate. The small standard errors indicate that the proposed method is useful for AGBD assessment. However, some sources of error were not accounted for in the study and thus the real uncertainties are probably slightly larger than those reported

How to consider the effects of time of day, beam strength, and snow cover in ICESat-2 based estimation of boreal forest biomass?

10438403Academy of Finlan