An overview of digital tools to support Hybrid Active Learning

Presentation slides giving an overview of core technologies to support Hybrid Active Learning at the University of Liverpool, including Canvas, VITAL / Blackboard, Microsoft O365 / Teams and other third party tools. Grouped by ABC learning design activity types (e.g. collaboration, discussion, investigation)

Designing curricula to develop digitally capable professionals in engineering and management:the case in two universities

The development of digital capabilities has received significant attention in higher education (HE) in recent years, with numerous attempts made to develop digital frameworks to support curriculum design. However, few studies have articulated these generic capabilities in terms of specific disciplines. This thesis addresses the gap of disciplinary conceptualisations of digital capabilities by exploring how they are planned and experienced in HE curricula in two professional disciplines at two UK universities. Originality of the study is achieved in part through a conceptual framework that weaves together a theoretical perspective - Shulman’s signature pedagogies, with JISC’s Digital Capability Framework. Underpinned by a human capabilities approach, the study employed a multiple-case study methodology with each discipline as a case, and four undergraduate/postgraduate modules as the units of analysis, drawing on documentary sources, and academic, professional and student perspectives via interviews, focus groups and observation. My findings indicate that the development of digital capabilities is aligned with the respective discipline’s signature pedagogy. In engineering, digital problem-solving and collaboration/communication, followed by data and information literacy, appear to be most prominent. In management, data and information literacy overlap with problem-solving, and, together with digital content communication, form its signature digital capabilities. The thesis highlights similarities, differences and gaps in the way digital capabilities are developed in engineering and management curricula. In addition, the research process itself offers a major theoretical contribution, together with the identification of management’s overarching signature pedagogy. Practical and theoretical implications of the study include the need to extend signature pedagogies to ‘signature assessments’, and articulating a link between signature digital capabilities and authentic assessments. Future research could explore potential solutions to a tension between mapping digital capabilities and constructive alignment. A methodological contribution of this study was using poems as a way of synthesising findings. Finally, using William Blake’s art as illustration, it is suggested that harnessing a passion for creativity could be a starting point for supporting the digital capabilities of tomorrow’s professionals

Learning Literacies through collaborative enquiry; collaborative enquiry through learning literacies

The extent to which university departments foster learning literacies that equip students with the diverse skills required for employment in a digital world is an issue that is under increased scrutiny in British higher education. The Learning Literacies in the Digital Age report (LLiDA by Beetham et al. 2009) offers a framework of learning literacies, which encompasses a range of literacies including academic, information, digital and media literacies. Building on the LLiDA framework, this article outlines and discusses an approach that aimed to extend the development of information literacies of first-year undergraduate students along with digital and media literacies. The central characteristics of this approach involved students working collaboratively, in teams, on an enquiry-based learning task using the institutional virtual learning environment’s wiki tool. The task involved developing and creating a wiki on exactly the kind of learning literacies that students were meant to acquire during this enquiry. This dual development was underpinned by the collaborative input of staff from academic and central services departments. Student survey feedback and observation were used to map the various gains in the areas of 1) collaboration and communication skills, 2) information literacy (IL), academic practice (study skills) and employability skills, 3) media and digital/computer literacies and, finally, 4) disciplinary skills. The findings confirm the usefulness of the LLiDA framework as well as point to its potential for further development to map literacies specific to the discipline.</jats:p

The eLearning place: progress report on a complete systems for learning and assessment

This short paper outlines the main features of The eLearning Place and describes the development of TestMaker by The eLearning Place partnership. TestMaker is an assessment creation tool written in Java adhering to QTI standards. It separates item- and test-development, and pools items by Learning Provider in an Oracle database

Learning, Student Digital Capabilities and Academic Performance over the COVID-19 Pandemic

During the time of COVID-19 lockdown over spring 2020, universities shifted teaching from on-campus blended learning to an emergency remote fully online approach. The aim of this study was to compare Psychology and Veterinary Science undergraduate students’ academic performance with their responses on a self-reported questionnaire regarding their digital capabilities, individual’s characteristics, and the role of environment on their independent learning process over the first COVID-19 lockdown period. Social-Cognitive Theory was adopted to conceptualise students’ behaviour, individuals’ characteristics, and learning environment with their academic performance to a learning framework. A total of 303 students from both disciplines (133 Psychology and 170 Veterinary Science undergraduate students) participated in this study by completing an online questionnaire after following the teaching shift from blended learning to full remote online approach at a UK University during the 2019–2020 academic year. Differences between students’ responses were identified due to their discipline’s curricular structure, students’ study behaviours (i.e., being exposed to unrelated learning activities), and students’ cognitive effort to think critically in the search, evaluation and managing of digital information. Students with high level of self-regulation and digital capabilities were able to keep focused and engaged during the lockdown. Although universities and teachers were “forced” to shift their teaching approach due to the unfortunate disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic, most students have coped with the changed teaching delivery mode relatively easy with minimum guidance. However, teachers should further consider how digital technologies could enhance students’ learning flexibility promoting critical thinking.</jats:p