Value of biomarkers in osteoarthritis: Current status and perspectives

Osteoarthritis affects the whole joint structure with progressive changes in cartilage, menisci, ligaments and subchondral bone, and synovial inflammation. Biomarkers are being developed to quantify joint remodelling and disease progression. This article was prepared following a working meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis convened to discuss the value of biochemical markers of matrix metabolism in drug development in osteoarthritis. The best candidates are generally molecules or molecular fragments present in cartilage, bone or synovium and may be specific to one type of joint tissue or common to them all. Many currently investigated biomarkers are associated with collagen metabolism in cartilage or bone, or aggrecan metabolism in cartilage. Other biomarkers are related to non-collagenous proteins, inflammation and/or fibrosis. Biomarkers in osteoarthritis can be categorised using the burden of disease, investigative, prognostic, efficacy of intervention, diagnostic and safety classification. There are a number of promising candidates, notably urinary C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II and serum cartilage oligomeric protein, although none is sufficiently discriminating to differentiate between individual patients and controls (diagnostic) or between patients with different disease severities (burden of disease), predict prognosis in individuals with or without osteoarthritis (prognostic) or perform so consistently that it could function as a surrogate outcome in clinical trials (efficacy of intervention). Future avenues for research include exploration of underlying mechanisms of disease and development of new biomarkers; technological development; the ‘omics’ (genomics, metabolomics, proteomics and lipidomics); design of aggregate scores combining a panel of biomarkers and/or imaging markers into single diagnostic algorithms; and investigation into the relationship between biomarkers and prognosis. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial

Recent advances in understanding the phenotypes of osteoarthritis

Abstract Recent research in the field of osteoarthritis (OA) has focused on understanding the underlying molecular and clinical phenotypes of the disease. This narrative review article focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the phenotypes of OA and proposes that the disease represents a diversity of clinical phenotypes that are underpinned by a number of molecular mechanisms, which may be shared by several phenotypes and targeted more specifically for therapeutic purposes. The clinical phenotypes of OA supposedly have different underlying etiologies and pathogenic pathways and they progress at different rates. Large OA population cohorts consist of a majority of patients whose disease progresses slowly and a minority of individuals whose disease may progress faster. The ability to identify the people with relatively rapidly progressing OA can transform clinical trials and enhance their efficiency. The identification, characterization, and classification of molecular phenotypes of rapidly progressing OA, which represent patients who may benefit most from intervention, could potentially serve as the basis for precision medicine for this disabling condition. Imaging and biochemical markers (biomarkers) are important diagnostic and research tools that can assist with this challenge

Disease burden of knee osteoarthritis patients with a joint replacement compared to matched controls: a population-based analysis of a Dutch medical claims database

OBJECTIVE: On a population level, the incidence of knee prostheses (KP) has increased, but excess health care costs per patient, compared to matched controls without a KP, in the years surrounding these procedures and their determinants are largely unknown. We therefore aimed to provide estimates of age and sex-specific incidence of KPs, revision KPs, and prosthesis complications in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine excess health care costs in the years surrounding surgery compared with matched controls. METHODS: All KPs in OA patients in the Achmea Health Database were identified as well as up to four controls. Incidence rates of KPs, revisions, and complications from 2006-2013 were determined. Annual health care cost and excess costs (over matched controls) preceding, during, and after surgery were calculated and their determinants were evaluated. RESULTS: The increased incidence of KPs, revisions, and complications was strongest in younger age categories and men. The average costs per patient were relatively stable between 2006-2012. KP patient's annual health care costs increased towards the year of surgery. After surgery, costs decreased, but remained higher as compared to costs prior to surgery. High post-surgery costs were mainly associated with subsequent revisions or additional KPs, but costs were also higher in females, lower age categories, and lower SES. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the increasing burden and medical need associated with end-stage OA, especially in younger age categories. Improvement of guidelines tailored to individual patient groups aimed at avoiding complications and revisions is required to counteract this increasing burden

Bone phenotypes in rheumatology:there is more to bone than just bone

Abstract Osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, all have one clear common denominator; an altered turnover of bone. However, this may be more complex than a simple change in bone matrix and mineral turnover. While these diseases share a common tissue axis, their manifestations in the area of pathology are highly diverse, ranging from sclerosis to erosion of bone in different regions. The management of these diseases will benefit from a deeper understanding of the local versus systemic effects, the relation to the equilibrium of the bone balance (i.e., bone formation versus bone resorption), and the physiological and pathophysiological phenotypes of the cells involved (e.g., osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes and chondrocytes). For example, the process of endochondral bone formation in chondrocytes occurs exists during skeletal development and healthy conditions, but also in pathological conditions. This review focuses on the complex molecular and cellular taxonomy of bone in the context of rheumatological diseases that alter bone matrix composition and maintenance, giving rise to different bone turnover phenotypes, and how biomarkers (biochemical markers) can be applied to potentially describe specific bone phenotypic tissue profiles

What is the value of biomarkers for drug development in osteoarthritis?

Molecular Epidemiolog