25 research outputs found
Rustige vastheid in tijden van crisis
Leiden Europa lezing door Herman van Rompuy Voorzitter van de Europese Raad. Uitgesproken aan de Universiteit Leiden Op vrijdag 10 oktober 2014ALL EXTER
Calm stability in times of crisis
Leiden Europe lecture by Herman van Rompuy President of the European Council Delivered at Leiden University on Friday, October 10, 2014ALL EXTER
The challenge of Jihadist radicalisation. In Europe and beyond. 2017
Today Europe finds itself on the frontline in the fight against terrorism
and jihadist radicalisation. Over the past fourteen months, the
horrendous terrorist attacks that have taken place in France, Germany
and Belgium, as well as in Turkey, Tunisia, and elsewhere around the
world, have claimed hundreds of lives. As a Belgian national, the three
bombs that were detonated in my country, in the departure hall of
the Brussels International Airport in Zaventem, and at the Maelbeek
Metro station, a few hundred metres from key EU institutions, was a
particularly traumatic moment for me. In many ways, the attacks of
22 March were Belgiumâs own 9/11, representing the worst terrorist
attacks committed on Belgian territory in the countryâs modern
history. The attacks demonstrate a clear shift in the resolve and ability
of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations,
and are devised to induce a high state of well-publicised terro
Challenges and new beginnings: Priorities for the EUâs new leadership. EPC Challenge Europe Issue 22, September 2014
Table of contents -
State of the Union and key challenges for Europe's future, Janis A. Emmanouilidis and Paul Ivan;
Europeâs economic challenges and the importance of ideas
and innovation, Herman Van Rompuy;
The growth challenge for Europe and the EMU, George Pagoulatos; Strengthening the euro area, Daniela Schwarzer; Social Europe. Can the EU again improve people's life prospects?, LĂĄszlĂł Andor; Solidarity and cohesion, Pawel Swieboda; The single market and competitiveness â the challenges
for the Juncker team, Malcolm Harbour; A European response to the resource and climate challenge, Jo Leinen; Renewal through international action? Options for EU foreign policy, Rosa Balfour; EU migration policy â new realities, new opportunities, Cecilia Malmström;
Freedom of movement of persons â the building-block of
European growth, Radoslaw Sikorski; Building up European leadership â an assessment of the recent process, Maria JoĂŁo Rodrigues; Populism in the EU: new threats to the open society?, Heather Grabbe; Differentiated Europe needs strong institutions, Alexander Stubb; Improving decision-making in the EU, Fabian Zuleeg; The need for a New Pact, Janis A. Emmanouilidis
Yes, we should! EU priorities for 2019-2024. EPC Challenge Europe Issue 24, April 2019
The European Union (EU) is not alone
in its struggle to grapple with the major
headaches of our times. The Western
world as a whole is affected. Inside the
Union, the crises in and of its national
societies and democracies have radiated
to the EU level. Half of the member states
have minority governments. If they are
politically weak in their own countries,
how can the Union be strong? The EU is,
after all, also the sum of its member states
Conventional direction to unconventional measures: using quantitative easing to shape Eurozone fiscal capacity
Eight years after the outbreak of the crisis, the Eurozone (EZ) fiscal policy remains fragmented at the national level. This paper fills the structural gap between the monetary and fiscal dimensions of EZ economic policy by suggesting a âconventionalâ direction to the unconventional Quantitative Easing (QE) policy of the European Central Bank (ECB). We propose an evolution for QE to tackle the shortcomings of the current âdecentralizedâ fiscal policy in the EZ. In a nutshell, we suggest a change in the composition of QE asset purchases, focusing on buying European Investment Bank (EIB) bonds that, in turn, would be used to finance real investments through the Juncker Plan programme. The rationale of our proposal is legitimised by an overview of the gloomy macroeconomic conditions of the EZ, and the situation in ongoing policies. The mechanism is described in detail, with a discussion of both its strengths and possible limitations
The Challenges for Europe in a Changing World. College of Europe EU Diplomacy Paper 3/2010, February 2010
This paper reproduces the keynote speech on Europe's role and place in the world that the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, delivered to the College of Europe students, professors, staff and invited guests at the Concert Hall 't Zand in Bruges on 25 February 2010
Préface
Jean de Ruyt, ancien reprĂ©sentant permanent de la Belgique auprĂšs de lâUnion europĂ©enne, est un fin connaisseur de la mĂ©canique europĂ©enne. Il eut Ă gĂ©rer la prĂ©sidence belge du Conseil de lâUnion au second semestre de 2010 avec une Belgique plongĂ©e dans la crise politique la plus profonde de ces cinquante derniĂšres annĂ©es. Il parle donc en orfĂšvre. Le « leadership de lâUnion europĂ©enne » est un sujet dĂ©licat et difficile. En effet, un certain Ă©quilibre entre les mĂ©thodes « communautaire » et..
Le leadership dans lâUnion europĂ©enne
LâUnion europĂ©enne ne se rĂ©conciliera avec ses citoyens que lorsque ceux-ci pourront identiÂfier de vĂ©ritables leaders au niveau des institutions. Partant de ce postulat, lâauteur mĂšne une rĂ©flexion Ă la fois historique et politique sur le leadership, tel quâil a Ă©tĂ© exercĂ© dans la CommuÂnautĂ© depuis ses dĂ©buts, puis dans lâUnion europĂ©enne jusquâaux nominations de 2014. Il dĂ©crit lâĂ©tat de grĂące des annĂ©es Delors, les succĂšs de Javier Solana, les dĂ©fis relevĂ©s par Herman Van Rompuy pendant la crise de lâEurozone, les responsabilitĂ©s accrues de la CommisÂsion sous JosĂ© Manuel Barroso, le parcours courageux de Cathy Ashton, puis la procĂ©dure des spitzenkandidaten, lâĂ©lection de Jean-Claude Juncker et le choix de Donald Tusk et de Fedcrica Moghcrini. Mais il souligne aussi les occasions manquĂ©es, la tendance naturelle de certains chefs de gouvernement Ă vouloir garder le contrĂŽle de la construction europĂ©enne, leur insistance Ă vouloir gĂ©rer lâUnion « de lâarriĂšre » MĂȘme si un grand nombre dâacteurs seront toujours impliquĂ©s dans lâĂ©laboration et la prise des dĂ©cisions europĂ©ennes, le leadership from behind nâest plus suffisant pour faire face aux dĂ©fis actuels. LâUnion a en effet de plus en plus de responsabilitĂ©s propres; ses rĂ©glementations ont une emprise de plus en plus Ă©troite sur la vie quotidienne des gens. Il est donc normal que ceux-ci souffrent de ne pas pouvoir identifier ceux qui les dirigent ou de voir leur sort dĂ©cidĂ© par des leaders quâils nâont pas choisis