28 research outputs found

    Health Care Human Factors/Ergonomics Fieldwork in Home and Community Settings

    Get PDF
    Designing innovations aligned with patients’ needs and workflows requires human factors/ergonomics (HF/E) fieldwork in home and community settings. Fieldwork in these extra-institutional settings is challenged by a need to balance the occasionally competing priorities of patient and informal caregiver participants, study team members, and the overall project. We offer several strategies that HF/E professionals can use before, during, and after home and community site visits to optimize fieldwork and mitigate challenges in these settings. Strategies include interacting respectfully with participants, documenting the visit, managing the study team–participant relationship, and engaging in dialogue with institutional review boards

    Beyond Disease: Technologies for Health Promotion

    Get PDF
    Health promotion is defined by the World Health Organization as “the process of enabling people to increase control over their health and its determinants, and thereby improve their health.” This is different from the bulk of formal healthcare processes, which are characterized by the treatment of an established disease. Much important human factors research and practice has been done to improve the healthcare delivery process and increasingly human factors professionals are also involved in work on health promotion. Such work has included examining the use and usability of wearable fitness tracking devices, studies of online health information seeking by healthy individuals, and human factors research on social robots for older adults, to name but a few examples. We discuss human factors applications in health promotion, focusing on examples from technology-related research

    Technology-Enhanced Practice for Patients with Chronic Cardiac Disease: Home Implementation and Evaluation

    Get PDF
    Objective: This 3-year field experiment engaged 60 nurses and 282 patients in the design and evaluation of an innovative home-care nursing model, referred to as technology-enhanced practice (TEP). Methods: Nurses using TEP augmented the usual care with a web-based resource (HeartCareII) that provided patients with self-management information, self-monitoring tools, and messaging services. Results: Patients exposed to TEP demonstrated better quality of life and self-management of chronic heart disease during the first 4 weeks, and were no more likely than patients in usual care to make unplanned visits to a clinician or hospital. Both groups demonstrated the same long-term symptom management and achievements in health status. Conclusion: This project provides new evidence that the purposeful creation of patient-tailored web resources within a hospital portal is possible; that nurses have difficulty with modifying their practice routines, even with a highly-tailored web resource; and that the benefits of this intervention are more discernable in the early postdischarge stages of care

    Macroergonomic factors in the patient work system: examining the context of patients with chronic illness

    Get PDF
    Human factors/ergonomics recognises work as embedded in and shaped by levels of social, physical and organisational context. This study investigates the contextual or macroergonomic factors present in the health-related work performed by patients. We performed a secondary content analysis of findings from three studies of the work of chronically ill patients and their informal caregivers. Our resulting consolidated macroergonomic patient work system model identified 17 factors across physical, social and organisational domains and household and community levels. These factors are illustrated with examples from the three studies and discussed as having positive, negative or varying effects on health and health behaviour. We present three brief case studies to illustrate how macroergonomic factors combine across domains and levels to shape performance in expected and unexpected ways. Findings demonstrate not only the importance of context for patients\u27 health-related activities but also specific factors to consider in future research, design and policy efforts. Practitioner Summary: Health-related activities of patients are embedded in and shaped by levels of social, physical and organisational context. This paper combined findings from three studies to specify 17 contextual or macroergonomic factors in home-and community-based work systems of chronically ill patients. These factors have research, design and policy implications

    Mechanisms of Communicating Health Information Through Facebook: Implications for Consumer Health Information Technology Design

    Get PDF
    Background: Consumer health information technology (IT) solutions are designed to support patient health management and have the ability to facilitate patients\u27 health information communication with their social networks. However, there is a need for consumer health IT solutions to align with patients\u27 health management preferences for increased adoption of the technology. It may be possible to gain an understanding of patients\u27 needs for consumer health IT supporting their health information communication with social networks by explicating how they have adopted and adapted social networking sites, such as Facebook, for this purpose. Objective: Our aim was to characterize patients\u27 use of all communication mechanisms within Facebook for health information communication to provide insight into how consumer health IT solutions may be better designed to meet patients\u27 communication needs and preferences. Methods: This study analyzed data about Facebook communication mechanisms use from a larger, three-phase, sequential, mixed-methods study. We report here on the results of the study\u27s first phase: qualitative interviews (N=25). Participants were over 18, used Facebook, were residents or citizens of the United States, spoke English, and had a diagnosis consistent with type 2 diabetes. Participants were recruited through Facebook groups and pages. Participant interviews were conducted via Skype or telephone between July and September 2014. Data analysis was grounded in qualitative content analysis and the initial coding framework was informed by the findings of a previous study. Results: Participants\u27 rationales for the use or disuse of a particular Facebook mechanism to communicate health information reflected six broad themes: (1) characteristics and circumstances of the person, (2) characteristics and circumstances of the relationship, (3) structure and composition of the social network, (4) content of the information, (5) communication purpose, and (6) attributes of the technology. Conclusions: The results of this study showed that participants consider multiple factors when choosing a Facebook mechanism for health information communication. Factors included what information they intended to share, what they were trying to accomplish, attributes of technology, and attributes and communication practices of their social networks. There is a need for consumer health IT that allows for a range of choices to suit the intersectionality of participants\u27 rationales. Technology that better meets patients\u27 needs may lead to better self-management of health conditions, and therefore, improve overall health outcomes

    The Patient in Patient Safety: Clinicians’ Experiences Engaging Patients as Partners in Safety

    Get PDF
    Patients and families play a role in the safety of care provided across clinical settings, highlighting the need to understand clinician perspectives and experiences related to their engagement. Through a panel discussion entitled, The Patient in Patient Safety: Clinicians’ Experiences Engaging Patients as Partners in Safety, we elicited clinician perspectives that have implications for human factors relevance in both, research and solution development/evaluation. We provide an overview of the panel including participants, format and content, and the resulting discussion

    Where to Treat: Home or Hospital? The Human Factors and Ergonomics Debate

    No full text
    A debate event during the Health-Care Environments Track. Dr. Lazzara was one of the debaters
    corecore