Systematics of the Neotropical Genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae): Phylogeny, the Relevance of Non-molecular Evidence, and Species Accounts

A phylogeny of the species-rich clade of the Neotropical frog genus Leptodactylus sensu stricto is presented on the basis of a total evidence analysis of molecular (mitochondrial and nuclear markers) and non-molecular (adult and larval morphological and behavioral characters) sampled from > 80% of the 75 currently recognized species. Our results support the monophyly of Leptodactylus sensu stricto, with Hydrolaetare placed as its sister group. The reciprocal monophyly of Hydrolaetare and Leptodactylus sensu stricto does not require that we consider Hydrolaetare as either a subgenus or synonym of Leptodactylus sensu lato. We recognize Leptodactylus sensu stricto, Hydrolaetare, Adenomera, and Lithodytes as valid monophyletic genera. Our results generally support the traditionally recognized Leptodactylus species groups, with exceptions involving only a few species that are easily accommodated without proposing new groups or significantly altering contents. The four groups form a pectinate tree, with the Leptodactylus fuscus group diverging first, followed by the L. pentadactylus group, which is sister to the L. latrans and L. melanonotus groups. To evaluate the impact of non-molecular evidence on our results, we compared our total evidence results with results obtained from analyses using only molecular data. Although non-molecular evidence comprised only 3.5% of the total evidence matrix, it had a strong impact on our total evidence results. Only one species group was monophyletic in the molecular-only analysis, and support differed in 86% of the 54 Leptodactylus clades that are shared by the results of the two analyses. Even though no non-molecular evidence was included for Hydrolaetare, exclusion of that data partition resulted in that genus being nested within Leptodactylus, demonstrating that the inclusion of a small amount of non-molecular evidence for a subset of species can alter not only the placement of those species, but also species that were not scored for those data. The evolution of several natural history and reproductive traits is considered in the light of our phylogenic framework. Invasion of rocky outcrops, larval oophagy, and use of underground reproductive chambers are restricted to species of the Leptodactylus fuscus and L. pentadactylus groups. In contrast, larval schooling, larval attendance, and more complex parental care are restricted to the L. latrans and L. melanonotus groups. Construction of foam nests is plesiomorphic in Leptodactylus but their placement varies extensively (e.g., underground chambers, surface of waterbodies, natural or excavated basins). Information on species synonymy, etymology, adult and larval morphology, advertisement call, and geographic distribution is summarized in species accounts for the 30 species of the Leptodactylus fuscus group, 17 species of the L. pentadactylus group, eight species of the L. latrans group, and 17 species of the L. melanonotus group, as well as the three species that are currently unassigned to any species group.Se presenta una filogenia del género Leptodactylus, un ciado neotropical rico en especies, basada en análises combinados de datos moleculares (marcadores nuclear y mitocondriales) y no moleculares (caracteres de la morfología de adultos y larvas así como de comportamiento) se muestrearon > 80% de las 75 especies reconocidas. Los resultados apoyan la monofília de Leptodactylus sensu stricto, con Hydrolaetare como su grupo hermano. La monofília recíproca de Hydrolaetare y Leptodactylus no requiere considerar a Hydrolaetare como un subgénero o sinónimo de Leptodactylus sensu lato. Se reconocen Leptodactylus sensu stricto, Hydrolaetare, Adenomera y Lithodytes como géneros monofiléticos válidos. Los resultados en general resuelven los grupos tradicionalmente reconocidos de Leptodactylus, con excepciones de algunas especies que son reasignadas sin la necesidad de proponer nuevos grupos o alterar significativamente el contenido de los grupos tradicionales. Los cuatro grupos de especies forman una topología pectinada donde el grupo de L. fuscus tiene una posición basal, seguido por el grupo de L. pentadactylus que es el grupo hermano al clado formado por los grupo de L. latrans y L. melanonotus. Se estimó el impacto de los datos no moleculares en los resultados, comparándose los resultados de evidencia total con los de los análises de datos moleculares solamente. Los datos no moleculares representan un 3.5% de la matriz de evidencia total, pero estos datos tuvieron un impacto significativo en los resultados del análisis de evidencia total. En el análisis estrictamente molecular solamente un grupo de especies resultó monofilético, y el apoyo difirió en 86% de los 54 ciados de Leptodactylus compartidos entre los dos análises. A pesar que datos no moleculares no fueron incluidos para Hydrolaetare, la exclusión de evidencia no molecular resultó en el género estar dentro de Leptodactylus, demostrando que la inclusión de evidencia no molecular pequeña para un subgrupo de especies altera no solamente la posición topológica de esas especies, sino tambien de las especies para las cuales dichos datos no fueron codificados. La evolución de patrones de historia natural y reprodución se evalúan en el contexto filogenético. La invasión de afloramientos rocosos y la construción de cámaras de reprodución subterraneas está limitada a los grupos de Leptodactylus fuscus y L. pentadactylus, mientras que la oofagia larval está restringida al grupo de L. pentadactylus. Por otro lado, los cárdumenes larvales, la proteción del cárdumen, y otros comportamientos parentales complejos carecterizan al clado formado por los grupos de especies de L. latrans y L. melanonotus. Los resúmenes de especies incluyen información de sinonimias, etimología, morfología de adultos y larvas, cantos, y distribución geográfica para las 30 especies del grupo de Leptodactylus fuscus, 17 especies del grupo L. pentadactylus, ocho especies del grupo de L. latrans, 17 especies del grupo de L. melanonotus, así como para las tres especies que actualmente no se encuentran asociadas a ninguno de los grupos de especies.Taran Grant was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Proc. 307001/2011-3 and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Proc. 2012/10000-5

A Leap Further: The Brazilian Amphibian Conservation Action Plan

Brazil has a fundamental role in amphibian conservation, harboring the highest amphibian species richness in the world and a large number of endemics. Here, we present an overview of the Brazilian Amphibian Conservation Action Plan (BACAP), which is still being developed by Brazilian herpetologists. Basic research - particularly species inventories, taxonomic revisions and the collection of field data - are urgently needed to guide amphibian conservation in the country. Documentation and monitoring of amphibian richness has improved, at least at regional scales. Lists of threatened species are regularly updated, efforts to standardize field work protocols are being attempted and captive breeding is being considered as a research and educational tool. We also present a short history of the BACAP, identify some of the challenges tied to its implementation, and review a few but important recent achievements. © ISSCA 2012.291-42843(2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, pp. 1-30. , ANONYMOUS [IUCN], Version 3.1. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK, IUCN Species Survival Commission(2003) Lista Nacional das Espécies da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçadas de Extinção, , http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sbf/fauna/index.cfm, ANONYMOUS [IBAMA], [accessed 4 September 2010](2007) Revisão das Listas Vermelhas da Flora e da Fauna Ameaçadas de Extinção Do Estado de Minas Gerais, , http://www.biodiversitas.org.br/listas-mg/, ANONYMOUS [Fundação Biodiversitas], Belo Horizonte, Fundação Biodiversitas. [accessed 26 September 2010]Secretaria do Estado do Meio Ambiente. Fauna Ameaçada no Estado de São Paulo (2009) Diário Oficial Do Estado de São Paulo, 118, p. 187. , ANONYMOUS [Estado São Paulo](2010) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, , http://www.iucnredlist.org/amphibians, ANONYMOUS [IUCN], Version 2010.4. [accessed 12 January 2011](2010) Brazilian Amphibians. List of Species, , http://www.sbherpetologia.org.br, ANONYMOUS [SBH], São Paulo, Brazil, Sociedade Brasi-leira de Herpetologia. [accessed 26 September 2010](2010) Monitoramento Do Desmatamento Nos Biomas, , http://www.mma.gov.br/sitio/index.php?ido=conteudo.monta&idEstrutura= 72&idConteudo=7422&idMenu=7508, ANONYMOUS [MMA], Brasília, Brasil, Ministério do Meio Ambiente. [accessed 26 September 2010]Alves, A.C.R., Sawaya, R.J., Reis, S.F., Haddad, C.F.B., A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Atlantic Rain Forest in São Paulo state, Southeastern Brazil (2009) J. Herp., 43, pp. 212-219Becker, C.G., Zamudio, K.R., Tropical amphibian populations experience higher disease risk in natural habitats (2011) PNAS, 108 (24), pp. 9893-9898Brooks, T., Fonseca, G.A.B., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Species, data, and conservation planning (2004) Conserv. Biol, 18 (6), pp. 1682-1688Carnaval, A.C.O.Q., Toledo, L.F., Haddad, C.F.B., Britto, F.B., Chytrid fungus infects high-altitude stream-dwelling Hylodes magalhaesi (Leptodactylidae) in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest (2005) Froglog, 70, p. 3Carnaval, A.C.O.Q., Puschendorf, R., Peixoto, O.L., Verdade, V.K., Rodrigues, M.T., Amphibian chytrid fungus broadly distributed in the Brazilian Atlantic Rain forest (2006) Ecohealth, , published on line: DOI: 10.1007/sl0393-005-0008-2Cushman, S.A., Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus (2006) Biol. Conserv., 128, pp. 231-240Dixo, M., Martins, M., Are leaf-litter frogs and lizards affected by edge effects due to forest fragmentation in Brazilian Atlantic forest? (2008) J. Trop. Ecol, 24, pp. 551-554Dixo, M., Metzger, J., The matrix-tolerance hypothesis: An empirical test with frogs in the Atlantic Forest (2010) Biodiv. Conserv., 19, pp. 3059-3071Dixo, M., Metzger, J., Morgante, J., Zamudio, K., Habitat fragmentation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity among toad populations in the Brazilian Atlantic Coastal Forest (2009) Biol. Conserv., 142, pp. 1560-1569Docherty, D.E., Meteyer, C.U., Wang, J., Mao, J., Case, S., Chinchar, V.G., Diagnostic and molecular evaluation of three iridovirus associated salamander mortality events (2003) J. WiIdI Dis., 39, pp. 556-566Eken, G., Bennun, L., Brooks, T.M., Darwall, W., Fishpool, L.D.C., Foster, M., Knox, D., Tordoff, A., Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets (2004) BioScience, 54, pp. 1110-1118Eterovick, P.C., Carnaval, A.C.O.Q., Borges-Nojosa, D.M., Silvano, D.L., Segalla, M.V., Sazima, L., Amphibian declines in Brazil: An overview (2005) Biotropica, 37, pp. 166-179Ficetola, G.E., Thuiller, W., Miaud, C., Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species - The American bullfrog (2007) Divers. Distrih, 13, pp. 476-485Funk, V.A., Richardson, K., Ferrier, S., Survey-gap analysis in expeditionary research: Where do we go from here? (2005) Biol. J. Linn. Soc, 85, pp. 549-567Gardner, T.A., Ribeiro-Júnior, M.A., Barlow, J.A., Ávila-pires, T.C.S., Hoogmoed, M., Peres, C., The value of primary, secondary, and plantation forests for a Neotropical Herpetofauna (2007) Conserv. Biol, 21, pp. 775-787Gascon, C., Collins, J.P., Moore, R.D., Church, D.R., Mckay, J.E., Mendelson Iii, J.R., (2007) Amphibian Conservation Action Plan. Glands, Switzerland & Cambridge, pp. 1-68. , UK, IUCN/SSC Amphibian Specialist GroupGibbons, J.W., Burke, V.J., Lovich, J.E., Semlitsch, R.D., Tuberville, T.D., Bodie, J.R., Greene, J.L., Karapatakis, D.J., Perceptions of species abundance, distribution, and diversity: Lessons from four decades of sampling on a governmentmanaged reserve (1997) Environ. Manag., 21 (2), pp. 259-268Graham, C.H., Ferrier, S., Huettman, F., Moritz, C., Peterson, A.T., New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis (2004) Trends Ecol. & Evol, 19 (9), pp. 497-503Green, D.M., The ecology of extinction: Population fluctuation and decline in amphibians (2003) Biol. Conserv., 111, pp. 331-343Griffiths, R.A., Kuzmin, S.L., Captive breeding of amphibians for conservation (2011) Conservation and Decline of Amphibians: Ecological Aspects, Effect of Humans, and Management, 10, pp. 3687-3703. , H. HEATWOLE & J. W. WILKINSON (ed.), Baulkham Hills, Surrey Beatty & Sons Pty. LtdGuerra-Fuentes, R.A., Dixo, M., Crossodactylus caramaschii: Mortality (2006) Herp. Rev., 37, p. 336Haddad, C.F.B., Giovanelli, J.G.R., Alexandrino, J., O aquecimento global e seus efeitos na distribuição e declínios dos anfibios (2008) Biologia & Mudanças Climáticas No Brasil, pp. 195-206. , M. S. BUCKERIDGE (org.), São Carlos, RiMa EdHayes, J.P., Steidl, R.J., Statistical power analysis and amphibian population trends (1997) Conserv. Biol, 11, pp. 273-275Heyer, W.R., Rand, A.S., Cruz, C.A.G., Peixoto, O.L., Decimations, extinctions, and colonizations of frog populations in Southeast Brazil and their evolutionary implications (1988) Biotropica, 20, pp. 230-235Keiser, K., Evaluation of a long-term amphibian monitoring protocol in Central America (2008) J. Herp, 42 (1), pp. 104-110Lips, K.R., Burrowes, P.A., Mendelson Iii, J.R., Parra-Olea, G., Amphibian declines in Latin America: A synthesis (2005) Biotropica, 37, pp. 222-226Lips, K.R., Brem, F., Brenes, R., Reeve, J.D., Alford, R.A., Voyles, J., Carey, C., Collins, J.P., Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian community (2006) PNAS, 103 (9), pp. 3165-3170Marengo, J.A., (2006) Mudanças Climáticas Globais e Seus Efeitos Sobre A Biodiversidade: Caracterização Do Clima Atual e Definição das Alterações Climáticas Para O Território Brasileiro Ao Longo Do Século XXI, pp. 1-212. , Brasília, MMAPavajeau, L., Zippel, K.C., Gibson, R., Johnson, K., Amphibian ark and the 2008 year of the frog campaign (2008) Int. Zoo Yeark, 42, pp. 24-29Pearman, P.B., Garner, T.W.J., Straub, M., Greber, U.F., Response of the Italian agile frog (Rana latasteí) to a Ranavirus, frog virus 3: A model for viral emergence in naive populations (2004) J. WiIdl. Dis., 40, pp. 660-669Peixoto, O.L., Anfíbios em coleções científicas no Brasil: Uma aproximação (2003) Coleções Biológicas de Apoio Ao Inventário, pp. 1-238. , A. L. PEIXOTO (org.), uso sustentável e conservação da biodiversi-dade, Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Pesquisa do Jardim BotânicoPellet, J., Schmidt, B.R., Monitoring distributions using call surveys: Estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence (2005) Biol. Conserv., 123, pp. 27-35Pimenta, B.V.S., Haddad, C.F.B., Nascimento, L.B., Cruz, C.A.G., Pombal, J.R., Comment on "Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide" (2005) Science, 309, p. 1999Pimenta, B.V.S., Wachlevski, M., Cruz, C.A.G., Morphological and acoustical variation, geographic distribution, and conservation status of the spinythumb frog Crossodactylus bokermanni Caramaschi and Sazima, 1985 (Anura, Hylodidae) (2008) J. Herp., 42 (3), pp. 481-492Pistoni, J., Toledo, L.F., Amphibian illegal trade in Brazil: What do we know? (2010) South Am. J. Herp., 5 (1), pp. 51-56Romansic, J.M., Diez, K.A., Higashi, E.M., Johnson, J.E., Blaustein, A.R., Effects of the pathogenic water mold Saprolegnia ferax on survival of amphibian larvae (2009) Dis. Aquat. Org., 83, pp. 187-193Ron, S., Predicting the distribution of the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in the New World (2005) Biotropica, 37, pp. 209-221Santos, T.C.C., Cámara, J.B.D., (2002) GeoBrasil 2002. Perspectivas Do Meio Ambiente No Brasil, pp. 1-440. , Brasília, Edições IBAMASchiesari, L.C., Grillitsch, B., Grillitsch, H., Biogeographic biases in research and their consequences for linking amphibian declines to pollution (2007) Conserv. Biol, 21, pp. 465-471Silvano, D.L., Segalla, M.V., Conservation of Brazilian amphibians (2005) Conserv. Biol, 19, pp. 653-658Silveira, L.F., Beisiegel, B.M., Curcio, F.F., Valdujo, P.H., Dixo, M., Verdade, V.K., Mattox, G.M.T., Cunningham, R.T.M., Para que servem os inventários de fauna? (2010) Estudos Avançados, 68, pp. 173-207Targino, M., Costa, P.N., Carvalho-E-Silva, S.P., Two new species of the Ischnocnema láctea species series from Itatiaia highlands, Southeastern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura, Brachycephalidae) (2009) South Am. J. Herp., 4 (2), pp. 139-150Tocher, M.D., Gascon, C., Meyer, J.R., Community composition and breeding sucesses of amazonian frogs in continuous forest and matrix aquatic sites (2001) Lessons from Amazonia: The Ecology and Conservation of A Fragmented Forest, pp. 235-247. , R. O. BIERREGAARD, C. GASCON, T. E. LOVEJOY & R. MESQUITA, (ed.), New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University PressToledo, L.F., Britto, F.B., Araújo, O.G.S., Giasson, L.M.O., Haddad, C.F.B., The occurrence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Brazil and the inclusion of 17 new cases of infection (2006) South Am. J. Herp., 1 (3), pp. 185-191Toledo, L.F., Carvalho-E-Silva, S.P., Sánchez, C., Almeida, M.A., Haddad, C.F.B., A revisão do Código Florestal Brasileiro: Impactos negativos para a conservação dos anfíbios (2010) Biota Neotrop., 10, pp. 1-4Toledo, L.F., Haddad, C.F.B., Carnaval, A.C.O.Q., Brito, F.B., A Brazilian anuran (Hylodes magalhaesi: Leptodactylidae) infected by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis: A conservation concern (2006) Ampli. Rept. Conserv., 4, pp. 17-21Verdade, V.K., Carnaval, A.C., Rodrigues, M.T., Schiesari, L., Pa Van, D., Bertoluci, J., Status of Amphibians: Western Hemisphere: Uruguay and Brazil, , etc Brazil. In HEATWOLE, H. (Ed.) Amphibian Biology. BARRIO- AMORÓS, C. L. & WILKINSON, J. W. (Co-Eds). Surrey Beatty & Sons PTY Limited, Baulkhlam Hills, AustraliaWake, D.B., Vredemburg, V.T., Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians (2008) PNAS, 105, pp. 11466-11473Weber, L.N., Verdade, V.K., Salles, R.O.L., Fouquet, A., Carvalho-E-Silva, S.P., An astonishing new frog genus (Anura: Cycloramphidae) from the highlands of Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, southeastern Brazil (2011) Zootaxa, 2737, pp. 19-33Weygoldt, P., Changes in the composition of mountain stream frog communities in the Atlantic mountains of Brazil: Frogs as indicators of environmental deteriorations? (1989) Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ., 243 (4), pp. 249-255Young, B.E., Lips, K.R., Reaser, J.K., Ibanez, R., Salas, A.W., Cedeno, J.R., Coloma, L.A., Romo, D., Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America (2001) Conserv. Biol., 15, pp. 1213-1223Young, B.E., Stuart, S.N., Chanson, J.S., Cox, N.A., Boucher, T.M., (2004) Joyas Que Están Desapareciendo. El Estado de Los Anfibios en El Nuevo Mundo, pp. 1-54. , Arlington, NatureserveZimmerman, B.L., Simberloff, D., An historical interpretation of habitats use by frogs in a central Amazon forest (1996) J Biogeogr., 23, pp. 27-4