18 research outputs found

    Comparison of the Hemostatic Efficacy of Pathogen-Reduced Platelets vs Untreated Platelets in Patients With Thrombocytopenia and Malignant Hematologic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Get PDF
    Importance: Pathogen reduction of platelet concentrates may reduce transfusion-transmitted infections but is associated with qualitative impairment, which could have clinical significance with regard to platelet hemostatic capacity. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of platelets in additive solution treated with amotosalen-UV-A vs untreated platelets in plasma or in additive solution in patients with thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancies. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Evaluation of the Efficacy of Platelets Treated With Pathogen Reduction Process (EFFIPAP) study was a randomized, noninferiority, 3-arm clinical trial performed from May 16, 2013, through January 21, 2016, at 13 French tertiary university hospitals. Clinical signs of bleeding were assessed daily until the end of aplasia, transfer to another department, need for a specific platelet product, or 30 days after enrollment. Consecutive adult patients with bone marrow aplasia, expected hospital stay of more than 10 days, and expected need of platelet transfusions were included. Interventions: At least 1 transfusion of platelets in additive solution with amotosalen-UV-A treatment, in plasma, or in additive solution. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients with grade 2 or higher bleeding as defined by World Health Organization criteria. Results: Among 790 evaluable patients (mean [SD] age, 55 [13.4] years; 458 men [58.0%]), the primary end point was observed in 126 receiving pathogen-reduced platelets in additive solution (47.9%; 95% CI, 41.9%-54.0%), 114 receiving platelets in plasma (43.5%; 95% CI, 37.5%-49.5%), and 120 receiving platelets in additive solution (45.3%; 95% CI, 39.3%-51.3%). With a per-protocol population with a prespecified margin of 12.5%, noninferiority was not achieved when pathogen-reduced platelets in additive solution were compared with platelets in plasma (4.4%; 95% CI, -4.1% to 12.9%) but was achieved when the pathogen-reduced platelets were compared with platelets in additive solution (2.6%; 95% CI, -5.9% to 11.1%). The proportion of patients with grade 3 or 4 bleeding was not different among treatment arms. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the hemostatic efficacy of pathogen-reduced platelets in thrombopenic patients with hematologic malignancies was noninferior to platelets in additive solution, such noninferiority was not achieved when comparing pathogen-reduced platelets with platelets in plasma. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01789762

    Treating multiple myeloma

    No full text

    L-asparaginase-based treatment of 15 western patients with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma and leukemia and a review of the literature.

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, and aggressive NK-cell leukemia are highly aggressive diseases with a poor outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report a multicentric French retrospective study of 15 patients with relapsed, refractory, or disseminated disease, treated with L-asparaginase-containing regimens in seven French centers. Thirteen patients were in relapse and/or refractory and 10 patients were at stage IV. RESULTS: All but two of the patients had an objective response to L-asparaginase-based treatment. Seven patients reached complete remission and only two relapsed. CONCLUSION: These data, although retrospective, confirm the excellent activity of L-asparaginase-containing regimens in refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma and aggressive NK-cell leukemia. Therefore, L-asparaginase-based regimen should be considered as a salvage treatment, especially for patients with disseminated disease. First-line L-asparaginase combination therapy for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma and aggressive NK-cell leukemia should be tested in prospective trials

    The clinical spectrum of IgM-related amyloidosis: a French nationwide retrospective study of 72 patients

    No full text
    Immunoglobulin M (IgM)-related amyloidosis remains a rare and little-known complication of monoclonal IgM-associated disorders. We sought to determine the clinical and laboratory presentation, response to treatment, and outcome of patients with IgM-related amyloidosis in the era of new therapeutic approaches. We conducted a retrospective study in 29 French centers to identify patients with monoclonal IgM and biopsy-proven amyloidosis; we reviewed patients' records and collected relevant clinical and laboratory data. We identified 72 patients with IgM-related amyloidosis. Systemic primary amyloidosis (AL) was present in 64, peritumoral AL in 5, and systemic secondary amyloidosis (AA) in 3 patients. A peculiar pattern of relatively frequent lymph node (31%) and lung (17%) involvement was noted in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Response to alkylating agents was poor, with a hematologic response in 37%, a complete remission in 0%, and an organ response in 21%. Response to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation showed a hematologic response in 100% with complete remission in 75% and an organ response in 75%. Purine analogs and rituximab induced a hematologic response in 73% and 60%, respectively, with complete remission in 9% and 0% and an organ response in 55% and 0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for survival were serum albumin level < or =3.5 g/dL (p = 0.018) and heart involvement (p = 0.0034). Further prospective studies are needed in patients with IgM-related amyloidosis, with special emphasis on treatment options: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and purine analogs could represent the most effective therapies. The identification of adverse prognostic factors of survival could be useful for those managing and making treatment decisions for these patients
    corecore