Análisis modal de fallos y efectos en el proceso de preinscripción, validación y dispensación de medicamentos

El objetivo principal de la presente investigación es conocer si la metodología de análisis modal de fallos y efectos (AMFE) apoyada por un estudio de intervención, identifica medidas para la disminución de los errores de medicación (EM), en el proceso de prescripción, validación y dispensación de medicamentos en pacientes hospitalizados, así como evaluar el impacto que tiene su aplicación en la reducción de los mismos

Incident adverse drug reactions in geriatric inpatients : a multicentred observational study

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common in older adults and frequently have serious clinical and economic consequences. This study was conducted as a feasibility study for a randomized control trial (RCT) that will investigate the efficacy of a software engine to optimize medications and reduce incident (in-hospital) ADRs. This study's objectives were to (i) establish current incident ADR rates across the six sites participating in the forthcoming RCT and (ii) assess whether incident ADRs are predictable. Methods: This was a multicentre, prospective observational study involving six European hospitals. Adults aged 65 years, hospitalized with an acute illness and on pharmacological treatment for three or more conditions were eligible for inclusion. Adverse events (AEs) were captured using a trigger list of 12 common ADRs. An AE was deemed an ADR when its association with an administered drug was adjudicated as being probable/certain, according to the World Health Organization Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality assessment. The proportion of patients experiencing at least one, probable/certain, incident ADR within 14 days of enrolment/discharge was recorded. Results: A total of 644 patients were recruited, evenly split by sex and overwhelmingly of White ethnicity. Over 80% of admissions were medical. The median number of chronic conditions was five (interquartile range 4-6), with eight or more conditions present in approximately 10%. The mean number of prescribed medications was 9.9 (standard deviation 3.8), which correlated strongly with the number of conditions (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). A total of 732 AEs were recorded in 382 patients, of which 363 were incident. The majority of events were classified as probably or possibly drug related, with heterogeneity across sites (chi(2) = 88.567, df = 20, p value < 0.001). Out of 644 patients, 139 (21.6%; 95% confidence interval 18.5-25.0%) experienced an ADR. Serum electrolyte abnormalities were the most common ADR. The ADRROP (ADR Risk in Older People) and GerontoNet ADR risk scales correctly predicted ADR occurrence in 61% and 60% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: This feasibility study established the rates of incident ADRs across the six study sites. The ADR predictive power of ADRROP and GerontoNet ADR risk scales were limited in this population

HIV and HCV screening by non-infectious diseases physicians: can we improve testing and hidden infection rates?

BackgroundMissed opportunities for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) testing remain high. We aimed to ascertain the knowledge of screening guidelines and attitudes of non-infectious disease (ID) hospital physicians and assess the impact of a 1-h session on screening rates and diagnoses.MethodsThis interventional study consisted of a 1-h training session on HIV and HCV epidemiology and testing guidelines for non-ID physicians. Pre-and post-session questionnaires compared the knowledge of the guidelines and attitudes toward screening before and after the session. Rates of screening and diagnoses were compared in three 6 months periods: before, immediately after, and 24 months ±4 after the session.ResultsA total of 345 physicians from 31 departments participated in these sessions. Before the session, 19.9% (28% medical, 8% surgical) and 17.9% (30% medical, 2.7% surgical) were aware of HIV and HCV testing guidelines, respectively. The willingness to routinely test increased from 5.6 to 22%, whereas not ordering tests decreased from 34.1 to 2.4%. HIV screening rates significantly increased by 20% after the session (7.7 vs. 9.3 tests per 103 patients; p &lt; 0.001), and the effect persisted until the long-term period. The HIV diagnosis rate increased globally (3.6 vs. 5.2 HIV diagnoses per 105 patients; p = 0.157), mainly because of medical services (4.7 vs. 7.7 per 105 patients; p = 0.082). The HCV screening rate increased significantly immediately and in the long term only in medical services (15.7 and 13.6%, respectively). The new active HCV infection rates increased immediately and declined steeply thereafter.ConclusionA short session for non-ID physicians can improve HIV/HCV screening, increase diagnosis, and contribute to disease elimination

Grado de satisfacción y conocimiento de pacientes positivos para HIV ante el cambio de tenofovir a tenofovir-alafenamida en tratamientos con emtricitabina y rilpivirina

Introduction: Satisfaction and knowledge among patients with HIV after switching from tenofovir to tenofovir/alafenamide remain unexplored. Given that both parameters are associated with better health outcomes it is relevant to measure them in patients during routine clinical practice.Objective: To evaluate the degree of knowledge and satisfaction in patients who had their antiretroviral regimen switched from rilpivirine (RPV)/emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF.Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective study in a third-level hospital between September, 2018, and November, 2018. We included patients who had previously been treated with RPV/FTC/TDF and collected their RPV/FTC/TAF treatment in the second visit. A 5-point Likert-type agreement/disagreement scale was used to assess satisfaction and knowledge regarding the medication switch.Results: We included 116 patients in the study of whom 75% were satisfied and 64% had a high-level of knowledge. Young patients were less satisfied with the way in which the change was explained (p=0.0487). Concerning the new medication, the patients were better informed about its renal (85% of them) and bone benefits (82%) than about its adverse effects on the lipid profile (40%).Conclusions: The patients were generally satisfied with the change in medication and well nformed about the dosage and advantages of TAF over TDF, but less well informed about the possible adverse effects of TAF.Introducción. La satisfacción y el conocimiento del cambio de tenofovir por tenofovir-alafenamida en pacientes con HIV no se han estudiado aún. Estos dos parámetros se relacionan con mejores resultados en salud y, por lo tanto, es importante medirlos durante la práctica clínica habitual.Objetivo. Evaluar el grado de conocimiento y satisfacción de los pacientes positivos para HIV ante el cambio de tratamiento antirretroviral con rilpivirina, emtricitabina y tenofovir (RPV-FTC-TDF) por rilpivirina, emtricitabina y tenofovir-alafenamida (RPV-FTC-TAF).Materiales y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo en un hospital de tercer nivel entre los meses de septiembre y noviembre de 2018. Se incluyeron pacientes previamente tratados con RPV-FTC-TDF que acudían por segunda vez a consulta para recibir el tratamiento con RPV-FTC-TAF. La satisfacción y el grado de conocimiento se analizaron mediante nueve preguntas, usando una escala de tipo Likert de 5 puntos para evaluar el grado de acuerdo.Resultados. Se incluyeron 116 pacientes en el estudio. El 75 % de ellos se mostró satisfecho con el cambio y se consideró que el 64 % conocía lo que implicaba. Los pacientes jóvenes se mostraron menos satisfechos con el modo en que se les explicó el cambio (p=0,0487). Los pacientes estaban mejor informados sobre las ventajas renales (85 % de conocimiento) y óseas (82 %) de la nueva medicación, que sobre sus inconvenientes para el perfil lipídico (40 %).Conclusiones. En general, los pacientes se mostraron satisfechos con el cambio de medicación y conocían la posología del medicamento y las ventajas de la tenofovir-alafenamida frente al tenofovir, pero no sus posibles efectos adversos

Impact of COVID-19 on the Care of Patients with HIV Infection

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown measures have been associated with substantial disruptions to health care services, including screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and management of people living with HIV (PLWH). Data from 3265 patients were examined in a retrospective cohort study. We compared outpatient follow-up for PLWH, the number of new patients, treatment adherence, hospitalizations, and deaths during the “pandemic period” (March 2020 to February 2021), the “pre-pandemic period” (the equivalent time frame in 2019), and the “post-pandemic period” (March to September 2021). During the pandemic period, the number of new patients seen at the HIV clinic (116) as well as the requested viral load tests (2414) decreased significantly compared to the pre-pandemic (204 and 2831, respectively) and post-pandemic periods (146 and 2640, respectively) (p < 0.01 for all the comparisons). However, across the three study periods, the number of drug refills (1385, 1330, and 1411, respectively), the number of patients with undetectable viral loads (85%, 90%, and 93%, respectively), and the number of hospital admissions among PLWH remained constant. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact, our findings show stability in the retention of clinical care, adherence to treatment, and viral suppression of PLWH, with no significant impact on hospitalization rates or all-cause mortality

Corrigendum to : prevention of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized older patients with multi-morbidity and polypharmacy : the SENATOR* randomized controlled clinical trial

When this paper was first published, there were errors in Figure 1 and Table 3. These errors have now been corrected online. In Figure 1, the text that read “No data available/lost to follow-up n = 56” should have read “No data available/lost to follow-up n = 40”. In Table 3, the text reading “Mortality (all-cause) within 30 days of randomization” should have read “Mortality (all-cause) within 12 weeks of randomization”. The authors wish to emphasize that these data presentation errors are minor and do not in any way alter the statistical results or conclusions of the published paper