Multi-dimensionnalité, modalité et activité(s): le cas "simple" de l'offre à boire

Jérome Jacquin & Xavier Gradoux (Eds)International audienceIn this paper we deal with the activity of "offering a drink" as an exemplary case of complex activity that cannot be fully described as an expanded adjacency pair. Relying on a corpus of naturally occurring conversations among friends, we focus our attention on the sequential and multimodal organization of this activity. First, we focus on how the activity is launched through various resources. Then, we turn to subsequent trajectories of the interaction. We consider cases of negociations of the offer, and then recurrent cases in which the activity is locally suspended. This leads to discuss whether the moments of suspension should be considered as stopping the activity or as being a part of it. On the basis of a multidimensional approach, and specifically with a focus on gestural cues, we argue for the existence of a "meso-interactional whole" (cf. Psathas 1991) to which participants keep oriented

« Et c’est qui le chef ? »

Dans cette contribution, nous nous intéressons à l’émergence et au traitement de désaccords pendant une activité pratique collective : faire la cuisine. Nous avons pu identifier deux configurations pour l’émergence d’un désaccord au cours de la préparation d’un repas, et différentes formes pour le déroulement des séquences de négociation :(1) un participant utilise un format syntaxique spécifique pour introduire une alternative par rapport à une étape de la recette, qui est en cours de réalisation ;(2) deux participants initient des longues séquences d’opposition qui portent sur la recette que l’un des deux a proposée, avant sa réalisation.Nous envisageons plusieurs dimensions analytiques. À partir de l’étude des productions verbales (notamment les marques de négation et les constructions syntaxiques) et des ressources multimodales mobilisées par les participants (gestes, regards, postures, manipulations d’objets), nous analysons la construction argumentative et séquentielle du désaccord émergeant, ainsi que les positionnements des participants, en termes épistémiques, par rapport à leur compétence dans le domaine culinaire.Ce travail s’inscrit dans la tradition de l’analyse conversationnelle et dans les travaux en linguistique interactionnelle plus récents. Il propose des analyses séquentielles et multimodales d’enregistrements audiovisuels d’interactions naturelles.This article focuses on the emergence and the sequential development of disagreements during a collective activity : cooking together. We have identified two configurations for the emergence of disagreement, as well as specific resources for expressing opposition in sequential environments :(1) a participant mobilizes a syntactic construction in order to proposea variation of the recipe during its preparation ; (2) two participants initiate long sequences of negotiation regarding the dish recipe they are about to prepare.This paper explores several dimensions. We take into account verbal productions - namely negative forms and syntactic constructions - as well as multimodal resources that are mobilized by participants (gestures, gazes, body postures, object manipulations). In so doing, we aim to analyze theargumentative and sequential construction of disagreements. We are also interested in studying the participants’ epistemic positioning in relation to their cooking abilities.Our study is based on the sequential and multimodal analysis of video-recorded naturally occurring interactions. It is grounded in conversation analysis and relies on recent contributionsin interactional linguistics

Candidate answers and rejections: managing referents as discourse objects in garden visits

International audienc

Le contact linguistique dans le passé. Ascoli et la notion de substrat en linguistique historique: À propos de "Due recenti Lettere glottologiche e una Poscritta nuova" (Isaia Graziadio ASCOLI, 1886)

National audienc

L'analisi multimodale di turni sintatticamente incompiuti: una prospettiva interazionale

In Biagio Ursi & Vanessa Piccoli (Eds)International audienceUnfinished turns can be considered problematic instances according to traditional syntactic frameworks. The multimodal interactional approach makes it possible to study these realizations and, in particular, their "non-canonical" completions, i.e. when they are accomplished in an embodied way by the same speaker. In this paper, relying on the video analysis of naturally occurring interactions, I propose a sequential and syntactic account of three main configurations of multimodal completions in Italian. The analysis of three types of syntactically unfinished turns and the embodied resources that complete these realizations lead me to discuss the multimodal organization of talk-in-interaction, namely the sequential status of iconic and pointing gestures integrating syntactic structures, as a primordial feature for the definition of interactional units across situational specificities. Extracts are issued from an eight-hours corpus documenting different settings, such as interactions in fair trades, ordinary interactions, and guided visits with native Italian speakers

Hands on Painting. A multimodal study of tactile visits in a contemporary art museum

Online conferenceInternational audienc

À la recherche du refus : les indices linguistiques et multimodaux de la négation dans l’interaction

Cycle d'ateliers/data sessions animés par Chloé Mondémé, Anna Claudia Ticca et Biagio UrsiIntervention dans le cadre des ateliers "DocINT – Doctorants et chercheurs interactionnistes" au laboratoire ICA

"Et c’est qui le chef ?" : négociations et manifestations du désaccord pendant la préparation de repas

National audienceThis article focuses on the emergence and the sequential development of disagreements during a collective activity : cooking together. We have identified two configurations for the emergence of disagreement, as well as specific resources for expressing opposition in sequential environments :(1) a participant mobilizes a syntactic construction in order to proposea variation of the recipe during its preparation ; (2) two participants initiate long sequences of negotiation regarding the dish recipe they are about to prepare.This paper explores several dimensions. We take into account verbal productions - namely negative forms and syntactic constructions - as well as multimodal resources that are mobilized by participants (gestures, gazes, body postures, object manipulations). In so doing, we aim to analyze theargumentative and sequential construction of disagreements. We are also interested in studying the participants’ epistemic positioning in relation to their cooking abilities.Our study is based on the sequential and multimodal analysis of video-recorded naturally occurring interactions. It is grounded in conversation analysis and relies on recent contributionsin interactional linguistics.Dans cette contribution, nous nous intéressons à l’émergence et au traitement de désaccords pendant une activité pratique collective : faire la cuisine. Nous avons pu identifier deux configurations pour l’émergence d’un désaccord au cours de la préparation d’un repas, et différentes formes pour le déroulement des séquences de négociation :(1) un participant utilise un format syntaxique spécifique pour introduire une alternative par rapport à une étape de la recette, qui est en cours de réalisation ;(2) deux participants initient des longues séquences d’opposition qui portent sur la recette que l’un des deux a proposée, avant sa réalisation.Nous envisageons plusieurs dimensions analytiques. À partir de l’étude des productions verbales (notamment les marques de négation et les constructions syntaxiques) et des ressources multimodales mobilisées par les participants (gestes, regards, postures, manipulations d’objets), nous analysons la construction argumentative et séquentielle du désaccord émergeant, ainsi que les positionnements des participants, en termes épistémiques, par rapport à leur compétence dans le domaine culinaire.Ce travail s’inscrit dans la tradition de l’analyse conversationnelle et dans les travaux en linguistique interactionnelle plus récents. Il propose des analyses séquentielles et multimodales d’enregistrements audiovisuels d’interactions naturelles

Painting Hands: recycled visitors’ gestures in a museum guided tour

Paper delivered at the panel "Recycling and reshaping previous turns in multimodal interactions" (chaired by Vanessa Piccoli and Biagio Ursi)International audienc

Please do touch. An exploration of tactile practices at museums through the lens of multimodality and multisensoriality

International audienceVisually impaired people have for a long time been excluded from museum visits. The mediation of an expert during exploration sequences of an artwork is a useful guidance and has been studied through the lens of the multimodal interaction analysis (Kreplak & Mondémé 2016). In this paper, I present two researches on multimodal practices in tactile exploration at museums. Two settings are analysed: (a) a multisensorial visit in a French museum garden with visually impaired children, accompanied by two teachers, and (b) a tactile exploration of the reproduction of artworks in an Italian contemporary art museum. In the first situation, the guide is not trained and this is visible through the accomplishments of repairing “right” gestures by the teachers, while they lead the activity of reading a Braille sign by specific haptic configurations on the pupils’ hands (Ticca & Ursi 2019). The second setting is a tactile visit involving several visitors, with and without visual impairments. A guide facilitates the exploration of a tactile picture through her hands and her words, with a special focus on the translation of certain details from the original painting.The fine-grained multimodal analysis of verbal resources, touching gestures and tactile practices shed light on the collaborative activity of artwork discovery through multisensoriality (Mondada 2019). The experiences analysed here are precious initiatives in favour of social inclusion (vom Lehn 2010) and awareness rising towards alternative routes in museum visits, also for sighted and non-disabled people.------------------------------------------------------------------------RÉFÉRENCES------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------KREPLAK, Y. & MONDÉMÉ, C. (2014). Artworks as touchable objects. Guiding perception in a museum tour for blind people. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with Objects. Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 295-317.MONDADA, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 145, 47-62.TICCA, A. C. & URSI, B. (2019). Le toucher dans une visite guidée avec des enfants malvoyants : orientation, transition, expérience. In A. Mazur-Palandre & I. Colón de Carvajal (Eds.), Multimodalité du langage dans les interactions et l’acquisition. Grenoble: UGA Éditions, 253-280.VOM LEHN, D. (2010). Discovering ‘Experience-ables’: Socially including visually impaired people in art museums. Journal of Marketing Management 26 (7/8), 749-769