Localization and detection of visual stimuli in monkeys with pulvinar lesions

Since the pulvinar receives a major ascending projection of the superior colliculus, pulvinar lesions might produce behavioral impairments resembling those that follow colliculus lesions. To test this possibility, we examined the effect of pulvinar lesions in monkeys on the localization and detection of brief light flashes, a task in which monkeys with colliculus lesions are severely impaired. Some of the pulvinar-lesioned monkeys showed localization impairments similar to those in monkeys with colliculus lesions. However, histological analyses of the lesions suggested that these deficits were related not to the pulvinar damage per se, but rather to interruption of corticotectal fibers that pass through the pulvinar. We conclude that the pulvinar is not critical for the ability to locate and detect brief visual stimuli.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46551/1/221_2004_Article_BF00238622.pd

Does Presentation Format Influence Visual Size Discrimination in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus spp.)?

Most experimental paradigms to study visual cognition in humans and non-human species are based on discrimination tasks involving the choice between two or more visual stimuli. To this end, different types of stimuli and procedures for stimuli presentation are used, which highlights the necessity to compare data obtained with different methods. The present study assessed whether, and to what extent, capuchin monkeys\u27 ability to solve a size discrimination problem is influenced by the type of procedure used to present the problem. Capuchins\u27 ability to generalise knowledge across different tasks was also evaluated. We trained eight adult tufted capuchin monkeys to select the larger of two stimuli of the same shape and different sizes by using pairs of food items (Experiment 1), computer images (Experiment 1) and objects (Experiment 2). Our results indicated that monkeys achieved the learning criterion faster with food stimuli compared to both images and objects. They also required consistently fewer trials with objects than with images. Moreover, female capuchins had higher levels of acquisition accuracy with food stimuli than with images. Finally, capuchins did not immediately transfer the solution of the problem acquired in one task condition to the other conditions. Overall, these findings suggest that - even in relatively simple visual discrimination problems where a single perceptual dimension (i.e., size) has to be judged - learning speed strongly depends on the mode of presentation