Efficacy of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Lung Sarcomatoid Carcinoma

Background:Sarcomatoid carcinomas (SCs) are rare tumors that may arise in the lung, accounting for 0.4% of non–small-cell lung cancers; the prognosis is poor. Only few retrospective small-size series have studied the efficacy of chemotherapy (CT) for metastatic SC.Methods:Multicenter study of patients with advanced or metastatic SC who received first-line CT. Clinical characteristics at baseline, response to first-line CT (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively collected.Results:Ninety-seven patients were included. Median age was 62 (54–72) years. The majority of patients were men (70%), white (84%), and smokers (84%). Overall, 73% of patients received first-line platinum-based CT. At first tumor evaluation, 69% of patients experienced progression, 31% had disease control, and 16.5% had partial response. Partial response was observed in 20% of patients receiving platinum-based CT, and in none of those receiving non–platinum-based CT (p = 0.018). Median PFS was 2.0 months (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.8–2.3). PFS was not statistically different between patients receiving or not receiving a platinum-based CT. Median OS was 6.3 months (CI 95%: 4.7–7.8). There was a trend toward better OS for patients treated with platinum-based CT (7.0 months [CI 95%: 4.9–9.0] versus 5.3 months [CI 95%: 2.8–7.6]; p = 0.096). In multivariate analysis, disease control at first evaluation (hazard ratio = 0.38 [CI 95%: 0.21–0.59]) and at platinum-based CT (hazard ratio = 0.92 [CI 95%: 0.85–0.99]) was associated with better OS.Conclusion:SC is associated with poor prognosis and high rate of resistance to conventional first-line CT. New therapeutic strategies are needed, based on better knowledge of the carcinogenesis of SC

Industries shaken - not stirred : optimising disruptive technologies

History has repeatedly shown that DTs offer incumbent enterprises opportunities to strengthen and penetrate their market position whilst providing new product/market combinations to emerging enterprises. As business models based on sustaining innovations do not tend to create new growth platforms, a firm wishing to make the strategic choice to shape an innovation into a disruptive growth business should enter new markets with a strategy based around disruption, commercialising products with lower performance, less functionality, and lower prices. This paper identifies more constructive ways of utilising DTs, both in large and medium-sized organisations, and attempts to show how DT can become, if properly managed, a capability-enhancing strategic asset with a potential to create an improved business model.3 page(s

Optimising Disruptive Technologies: Applications to Transportation

9 page(s

Are there different paths for disruptive technologies? Alternative trajectiories to optimisation of DT

In this study, we challenge established recommendations for best practice strategies to technology management, particularly disruptive technologies (DT). We identify more constructive ways of utilising DTs, both in large and medium-sized organisations, and how DTs can become, if managed in a more nurturing context, a capability-enhancing strategic asset with a potential to create an improved business model.15 page(s

Management and outcome of male metastatic breast cancer in the national multicenter observational research program Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME)

International audienceBackground and Aims: Because of its low prevalence, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in males is managed based on clinical experience with women. Using a real-life database, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of male MBC characteristics, management and outcome. Methods: The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics Data Platform collected data for all men and women ⩾18 years with MBC in 18 participating French Comprehensive Cancer Centers from January 2008 to November 2016. Demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics were retrieved, as was treatment modality. Men were matched 1:1 to women with similar characteristics. Results: Of 16,701 evaluable patients, 149 (0.89%) men were identified. These men were older (median age 69 years) and predominantly had hormone receptor HR+/HER2– disease (78.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was 41.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI: 26.9–49.7)] and similar to women. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy was 9.3 months [95% CI (7.4–11.5)]. In the HR+/HER2– subpopulation, endocrine therapy (ET) alone was the frontline treatment for 43% of patients, including antiestrogens ( n = 19), aromatase inhibitors ( n = 15) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs ( n = 3), and various sequential treatments. Median PFS achieved by frontline ET alone was similar in men [9.8 months, 95% CI (6.9–17.4)] and in women [13 months, 95% CI (8.4–30.9)] ( p = 0.80). PFS was similar for HR+/HER2– men receiving upfront ET or chemotherapy: 9.8 months [95% CI (6.9–17.4)] versus 9.5 months [95% CI (7.4–11.7)] ( p = 0.22), respectively. Conclusion: MBC management in men and women leads to similar outcomes, especially in HR+/HER2– patients for whom ET should also be a cornerstone. Unsolved questions remain and successfully recruiting trials for men are still lacking

Real-World Impact of Adjuvant Anti-HER2 Treatment on Characteristics and Outcomes of Women With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in the ESME Program

Abstract Background Although adjuvant cancer treatments increase cure rates, they may induce clonal selection and tumor resistance. Information still lacks as whether (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 treatments impact the patterns of recurrence and outcomes of HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We aimed to assess this in the large multicenter ESME real-world database. Patients and Methods We examined the characteristics and outcomes (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival under first-line treatment (PFS1)) of HER2+ patients with MBC from the French ESME program with recurrent disease, as a function of the previous receipt of adjuvant trastuzumab. Multivariable analyses used Cox models adjusted for baseline demographic, prognostic factors, adjuvant treatment received, and disease-free interval. Results Two thousand one hundred and forty-three patients who entered the ESME cohort between 2008 and 2017 had a recurrent HER2+ MBC. Among them, 56% had received (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab and 2.5% another anti-HER2 in this setting. Patients pre-exposed to trastuzumab were younger, had a lower disease-free interval, more HR-negative disease and more metastatic sites. While the crude median OS appeared inferior in patients exposed to adjuvant trastuzumab, as compared to those who did not (37.2 (95%CI 34.4-40.3) versus 53.5 months (95% CI: 47.6-60.1)), this difference disappeared in the multivariable model (HR = 1.05, 95%CI 0.91-1.22). The same figures were observed for PFS1. Conclusions Among patients with relapsed HER2+ MBC, the receipt of adjuvant trastuzumab did not independently predict for worse outcomes when adjusted to other prognostic factors

Long-Term Results with Everolimus in Advanced Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer in a Multicenter National Real-World Observational Study

Everolimus is the first oral targeted therapy widely used in advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We sought to evaluate the impact of everolimus-based therapy on overall survival in the ESME-MBC database, a national metastatic breast cancer cohort that collects retrospective data using clinical trial-like methodology including quality assessments. We compared 1693 patients having received everolimus to 5928 patients not exposed to everolimus in the same period. Overall survival was evaluated according to treatment line, and a propensity score with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method was built to adjust for differences between groups. Crude and landmark overall survival analyses were all compatible with a benefit from everolimus-based therapy. Adjusted hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16–0.72, p = 0.0054), 0.34 (95% CI: 0.22–0.52, p < 0.0001), and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.14–0.36, p < 0.0001) for patients treated with everolimus in line 1, 2, and 3 and beyond, respectively. No clinically relevant benefit on progression-free survival was observed. Causes for everolimus discontinuation were progressive disease (56.2%), adverse events (27.7%), and other miscellaneous reasons. Despite the limitations inherent to such retrospective studies, these results suggest that adding everolimus-based therapy to the therapeutic sequences in patients with advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer may favorably affect overall survival

Treatment and outcomes of older versus younger women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the real-world national ESME database

International audienceBACKGROUND: Treatment and outcomes of patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have dramatically improved over the past 20 years. This work evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes according to age. METHODS: Women who initiated a treatment for HER2+ MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French comprehensive centers part of the ESME program were included. Objectives were the description of first-line treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), first-line progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors among patients aged 70 years or more (70+), or less than 70 (<70). RESULTS: Of 4045 women diagnosed with an HER2+ MBC, 814 (20%) were 70+. Standard first-line treatment (chemotherapy combined with an anti-HER2 therapy) was prescribed in 65% of 70+ versus 89% of <70 patients (p < 0.01). Median OS was 49.2 (95% CI, 47.1-52.4), 35.3 (95% CI, 31.5-37.0) and 54.2 months (95% CI, 50.8-55.7) in the whole population, in patients 70+ and <70, respectively. Corresponding median PFS1 were 12.8 (95% CI, 12.3-13.3), 11.1 (95% CI, 10.0-12.3) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 12.7-13.9), respectively. In 70+ women, initiation of non-standard first-line treatment had an independent detrimental time-varying effect on both OS and PFS (HR on OS at 1 year: chemotherapy without anti-HER2 2.79 [95% CI: 2.05-3.79]; endocrine therapy and/or anti-HER2 1.96 [95% CI: 1.43-2.69]). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective real-life database, older women with HER2+ MBC received standard first-line treatment less frequently than younger ones. This was independently associated with a worse outcome, but confounding factors and usual selection biases cannot be ruled out