Rapid titration of VNS therapy reduces time-to-response in epilepsy.

Common titration strategies for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) prioritize monitoring of tolerability during small increases in stimulation intensity over several months. Prioritization of tolerability is partially based on how quickly side effects can be perceived and reported by patients, and the delayed onset of clinical benefits from VNS. However, many practices assess the clinical benefit of VNS at one year after implantation, and excessive caution during the titration phase can significantly delay target dosing or prevent a patient from reaching a therapeutic dose entirely. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between titration speed and the onset of clinical response to VNS. To assess differences between more aggressive titration strategies and more conservative ones, we analyzed the relationship between time-to-dose and time-to-response using a weighted Cox regression. The target dose was empirically defined as 1.625 mA output current delivered at 250 microsecond pulse widths at 20 Hz. Patient-level outcomes and dosing data were segregated into fast (6 months) cohorts based on their titration speed. The statistical model revealed a significant relationship between titration speed and onset of clinical response, defined as a 50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency. Frequency of adverse events reported between each cohort trended toward higher rates of adverse events in adults who were titrated quickly; however, the pediatric population appeared to be more tolerant of titration at any speed. This analysis indicates that faster titration yields faster onset of clinical benefit and is especially practical in the pediatric population, though attempts to accelerate adult titration may still be warranted

Rapid titration of VNS therapy reduces time-to-response in epilepsy

Common titration strategies for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) prioritize monitoring of tolerability during small increases in stimulation intensity over several months. Prioritization of tolerability is partially based on how quickly side effects can be perceived and reported by patients, and the delayed onset of clinical benefits from VNS. However, many practices assess the clinical benefit of VNS at one year after implantation, and excessive caution during the titration phase can significantly delay target dosing or prevent a patient from reaching a therapeutic dose entirely. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between titration speed and the onset of clinical response to VNS. To assess differences between more aggressive titration strategies and more conservative ones, we analyzed the relationship between time-to-dose and time-to-response using a weighted Cox regression. The target dose was empirically defined as 1.625 mA output current delivered at 250 microsecond pulse widths at 20 Hz. Patient-level outcomes and dosing data were segregated into fast (6 months) cohorts based on their titration speed. The statistical model revealed a significant relationship between titration speed and onset of clinical response, defined as a 50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency. Frequency of adverse events reported between each cohort trended toward higher rates of adverse events in adults who were titrated quickly; however, the pediatric population appeared to be more tolerant of titration at any speed. This analysis indicates that faster titration yields faster onset of clinical benefit and is especially practical in the pediatric population, though attempts to accelerate adult titration may still be warranted

VNS parameters for clinical response in Epilepsy

While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been in use for over two decades, little professional guidance exists to describe dosing and titration of therapy which is the consequence of a limited amount of evidence developed during the pre-market phase of therapy development. Post-market surveillance of dosing practice has revealed significant deviations from dosing and titration guidance offered by professional societies as well as the manufacturer

PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE RAPID TITRATION OF VNS

Objective For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for epilepsy surgery, Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is the most widely available neuromodulation option and has been available in some countries for over 25 years. Given its broad availability and extended history on the market, many healthcare providers (HCPs) have developed individualized practice habits regarding the titration and dosing of VNS. This work describes the extent to which VNS management differs between providers and discusses how such idiosyncrasies may impact patient outcomes. Methods In this work, the evolution of practice habits regarding the titration and dosing of VNS was explored through a survey of HCPs as well as an examination of programming history data collected as part of routine product surveillance by the manufacturer. Results Programming history data revealed a decades long trend toward lower VNS doses from the late 1990s until the late 2010s that recently started to reverse (since 2017). Examination of programming history data from the past 5 years suggests that this increase in VNS dose post 2017 may be associated with the use of the automated titration using “Scheduled Programming” available on the newest VNS models. The global survey revealed significant idiosyncrasy in dosing and titration habits. Providers reported a wide range of initial/maximum target doses and time-to-dose, even if the population averages approximated guidance from professional societies and the manufacturer’s labeling. Idiosyncratic dosing and titration was reflected in varied perception of how long it takes to realize the clinical benefits of VNS. Conclusions Our results suggest VNS providers would benefit from continued training on the use of VNS and the use of the scheduled programming feature in order to enhance consistency of VNS management between providers

In vivo, in vitro and in silico correlations of four de novo SCN1A missense mutations.

Mutations in the SCN1A gene, which encodes for the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.1, cause Dravet syndrome, a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Genetic testing of this gene is recommended early in life. However, predicting the outcome of de novo missense SCN1A mutations is difficult, since milder epileptic syndromes may also be associated. In this study, we correlated clinical severity with functional in vitro electrophysiological testing of channel activity and bioinformatics prediction of damaging mutational effects. Three patients, bearing the mutations p.Gly177Ala, p.Ser259Arg and p.Glu1923Arg, showed frequent intractable seizures that had started early in life, with cognitive and behavioral deterioration, consistent with classical Dravet phenotypes. These mutations failed to produce measurable sodium currents in a mammalian expression system, indicating complete loss of channel function. A fourth patient, who harbored the mutation p.Met1267Ile, though presenting with seizures early in life, showed lower seizure burden and higher cognitive function, matching borderland Dravet phenotypes. In correlation with this, functional analysis demonstrated the presence of sodium currents, but with partial loss of function. In contrast, six bioinformatics tools for predicting mutational pathogenicity suggested similar impact for all mutations. Likewise, homology modeling of the secondary and tertiary structures failed to reveal misfolding. In conclusion, functional studies using patch clamp are suggested as a prognostic tool, whereby detectable currents imply milder phenotypes and absence of currents indicate an unfavorable prognosis. Future development of automated patch clamp systems will facilitate the inclusion of such functional testing as part of personalized patient diagnostic schemes

Management of epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex: Updated clinical recommendations

Patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) are at very high risk for developing epilepsy, and the majority experience seizure onset during the first year of life. Early targeted interventions increase the probability of seizure-freedom and may protect neurodevelopment. In 2012, clinical recommendations for the management of epilepsy in patients with TSC were published by a panel of European experts. Since that time novel studies, reports, and expert opinions in preclinical and clinical TSC-related sciences prompted the need for updated recommendations, including epileptogenesis in TSC, the potential role of predictive biomarkers, the possible benefits of presymptomatic diagnosis and preventive treatment, and new treatment options including mTOR inhibitors. A reconvened panel reviewed the current literature to answer specific questions and five panelists discussed the findings, followed by a general discussion during which all issues were debated to achieve consensus regarding recommendations. A draft manuscript based on these discussions and recommendations was then circulated several times among the panelists, who added their own comments. All the panelists/authors agreed with the final manuscript, which was then submitted for publication. The panel concluded that the need for early diagnosis of TSC-associated seizures is now established, electroencephalographic monitoring has good predictive value for epilepsy before seizure onset in TSC, and, until conclusive data from the EPISTOP trial are available, administration of vigabatrin may be considered in children with subclinical epileptiform EEG discharges. The panel also supported the role of adjunctive everolimus for TSC-associated drug-refractory seizures and emphasized the necessity of early surgical evaluation.status: publishe

A randomized, double-blind trial of triheptanoin for drug-resistant epilepsy in glucose transporter 1 deficiency syndrome.

Funder: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013220OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate efficacy and long-term safety of triheptanoin in patients >1 year old, not on a ketogenic diet, with drug-resistant seizures associated with glucose transporter 1 deficiency syndrome (Glut1DS). METHODS: UX007G-CL201 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Following a 6-week baseline period, eligible patients were randomized 3:1 to triheptanoin or placebo. Dosing was titrated to 35% of total daily calories over 2 weeks. After an 8-week placebo-controlled period, all patients received open-label triheptanoin through Week 52. RESULTS: The study included 36 patients (15 children, 13 adolescents, eight adults). A median 12.6% reduction in overall seizure frequency was observed in the triheptanoin arm relative to baseline, and a 13.5% difference was observed relative to placebo (p = .58). In patients with absence seizures only (n = 9), a median 62.2% reduction in seizure frequency was observed in the triheptanoin arm relative to baseline. Only one patient with absence seizures only was present in the control group, preventing comparison. No statistically significant differences in seizure frequency were observed. Common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and nausea, mostly mild or moderate in severity. No serious adverse events were considered to be treatment related. One patient discontinued due to status epilepticus. SIGNIFICANCE: Triheptanoin did not significantly reduce seizure frequency in patients with Glut1DS not on the ketogenic diet. Treatment was associated with mild to moderate gastrointestinal treatment-related events; most resolved following dose reduction or interruption and/or medication for treatment. Triheptanoin was not associated with any long-term safety concerns when administered at dose levels up to 35% of total daily caloric intake for up to 1 year