20 research outputs found

    Cross-sectional associations of depressive symptom severity and functioning with health service use by older people in low-and-middle income countries

    No full text
    Background: Comprehensive understanding of the determinants of health service use (HSU) by older people with depression is essential for health service planning for an ageing global population. This study aimed to determine the extent to which depressive symptom severity and functioning are associated with HSU by older people with depression in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based surveys dataset. Participants (n = 4590) were those aged 65 or older, in the clinical range for depressive symptoms (defined as scoring four or more on the EURO-D), living in 13 urban and/or rural catchment areas in nine LMICs. Associations were calculated using Poisson regression and random-effects meta-analysis. Results: After adjustment for confounding variables, (EURO-D) depressive symptom severity was significantly associated with “any community HSU” (Pooled Prevalence Ratios = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01–1.03) but not hospital admission. Conversely, after adjustment, (WHODAS-II) functioning was significantly associated with hospital admission (Pooled PR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.02–1.26) but not “any community HSU”. Conclusions: Depressive symptom severity does not explain a large proportion of the variance in HSU by older people with depression in LMICs. The association of functioning with this HSU is worthy of further investigation. In LMICs, variables related to accessibility may be more important correlates of HSU than variables directly related to health problems

    Cross-sectional associations of depressive symptom severity and functioning with health service use by older people in low-and-middle income countries

    Get PDF
    Background: Comprehensive understanding of the determinants of health service use (HSU) by older people with depression is essential for health service planning for an ageing global population. This study aimed to determine the extent to which depressive symptom severity and functioning are associated with HSU by older people with depression in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based surveys dataset. Participants (n = 4590) were those aged 65 or older, in the clinical range for depressive symptoms (defined as scoring four or more on the EURO-D), living in 13 urban and/or rural catchment areas in nine LMICs. Associations were calculated using Poisson regression and random-effects meta-analysis. Results: After adjustment for confounding variables, (EURO-D) depressive symptom severity was significantly associated with “any community HSU” (Pooled Prevalence Ratios = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01–1.03) but not hospital admission. Conversely, after adjustment, (WHODAS-II) functioning was significantly associated with hospital admission (Pooled PR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.02–1.26) but not “any community HSU”. Conclusions: Depressive symptom severity does not explain a large proportion of the variance in HSU by older people with depression in LMICs. The association of functioning with this HSU is worthy of further investigation. In LMICs, variables related to accessibility may be more important correlates of HSU than variables directly related to health problems

    Utility of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) in Predicting Mental Health Service Costs for Patients with Common Mental Health Problems : Historical Cohort Study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Few countries have made much progress in implementing transparent and efficient systems for the allocation of mental health care resources. In England there are ongoing efforts by the National Health Service (NHS) to develop mental health 'payment by results' (PbR). The system depends on the ability of patient 'clusters' derived from the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) to predict costs. We therefore investigated the associations of individual HoNOS items and the Total HoNOS score at baseline with mental health service costs at one year follow-up.METHODS: An historical cohort study using secondary care patient records from the UK financial year 2012-2013. Included were 1,343 patients with 'common mental health problems', represented by ICD-10 disorders between F32-48. Costs were based on patient contacts with community-based and hospital-based mental health services. The costs outcome was transformed into 'high costs' vs 'regular costs' in main analyses.RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, 11 HoNOS items were not associated with costs. The exception was 'self-injury' with an odds ratio of 1.41 (95% CI 1.10-2.99). Population attributable fractions (PAFs) for the contribution of HoNOS items to high costs ranged from 0.6% (physical illness) to 22.4% (self-injury). After adjustment, the Total HoNOS score was not associated with costs (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.07). However, the PAF (33.3%) demonstrated that it might account for a modest proportion of the incidence of high costs.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide limited support for the utility of the self-injury item and Total HoNOS score in predicting costs. However, the absence of associations for the remaining HoNOS items indicates that current PbR clusters have minimal ability to predict costs, so potentially contributing to a misallocation of NHS resources across England. The findings may inform the development of mental health payment systems internationally, especially since the vast majority of countries have not progressed past the early stages of this development. Discrepancies between our findings with those from Australia and New Zealand point to the need for further international investigations

    The utility of functioning in predicting health service use by people with common mental disorders

    No full text
    BackgroundMental health services are under-resourced in countries around the world. It is essential therefore that the scarce resources are allocated fairly and efficiently. To facilitate this process, extensive knowledge of the variables associated with health service use (HSU) by people with mental disorders is required. As diagnoses and symptoms may not explain a large proportion of the variance in this HSU, there is a need to investigate the relevant associations of other variables. The term ‘functioning’ relates to physical and mental functions and the ability to undertake activities and participate in all of life. The studies described within this thesis were to determine the utility of functioning in predicting HSU by people with common mental disorders. It was hypothesised that functioning would have good utility in this prediction.MethodsA systematic review was initially undertaken, followed by three empirical studies: one set in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and two within the English National Health Service (NHS).Results(1) Systematic Review: There is a lack of existing research into the association of functioning with HSU. The available evidence was mixed: three functioning variables (i.e. cognitive deficits, social withdrawal and activities of daily living) were significantly associated with HSU, but only in 55% of the assessments conducted on them.(2) Cross-sectional study: For older people with depression living in LMICs (n=4,590), functioning was significantly associated with one HSU outcome (i.e. hospital admission) but not another (i.e. “any community HSU”).(3) Historical cohort study: the seven functioning items from the HoNOS instrument were not associated with mental health service costs for patients with common mental disorders, over one year (n=1,343).(4) Prospective cohort study: functioning predicted total NHS costs for patients with mood and anxiety disorders over a six month period (n=102).DiscussionThe mixed findings provide partial support for the hypothesised predictive ability of functioning. Narrow operationalisations of functioning evidently have limited utility in predicting HSU. However, the positive findings of the final study support the predictive ability of ‘multi-domain’ functioning. Multi-domain functioning information could therefore be useful for the formation of patient clusters within mental health payment systems

    Effectiveness of a tailored, integrative Internet intervention (deprexis) for depression: Updated meta-analysis.

    No full text
    Digitally delivered interventions for depression vary in many aspects, including their therapeutic orientation, depth of content, interactivity, individual tailoring, inclusion of multimedia, cost, and effectiveness. However, their effectiveness is rarely examined in intervention-specific meta-analyses. An earlier meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials (RCT) demonstrated the effectiveness of a tailored, integrative digital intervention (deprexis), which is delivered via the Internet. This updated meta-analysis of twelve deprexis-specific RCT with a total of N = 2901 participants confirmed the effectiveness of deprexis for depression reduction at post-intervention (g = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.40-0.62, I2 = 26%). Results were analogous when study quality, screening and randomization procedure were taken into account. Clinician guidance, developer-involvement, setting (community vs. clinical), and initial symptom severity did not have statistically significant effects on the effect size, and there was no evidence of publication bias. Thus, these findings demonstrate that deprexis can facilitate clinically relevant reduction of depressive symptoms over 8-12 weeks across a broad range of initial symptom severity, and that the intervention can be combined with other forms of depression treatment. There is now a need to study the intervention's implementation in routine care settings as well as its long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in diverse cultural and linguistic settings
    corecore