Implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and risk of myocardial infarction or death at 5 years: stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial

AbstractObjective: To evaluate the impact of implementing a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay on long-term outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromeDesign: Secondary observational analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial.Setting: Ten secondary and tertiary care centresParticipants: Consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=48,282; 47% women) were included in this trial. Myocardial injury was defined as any high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentration &gt;99th centile of 16 ng/L in women and 34 ng/L in men.Intervention: Hospital sites were randomly allocated to early (n=5 hospitals) or late (n=5 hospitals) implementation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay with sex-specific diagnostic thresholds.Main Outcome Measures: Subsequent myocardial infarction or death at 5 years.Results: Overall, 10,360 patients had cardiac troponin concentrations greater than the 99th centile of whom 1,771 (17%) were reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay. The 5-year incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction or death before and after implementation of the high-sensitivity assay was 29% (5,588/18,978) versus 26% (7,591/29,304), respectively, in all patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.97 [95% CI 0.93 to 1.01]), and 63% (456/720) versus 54% (567/1,051) in those reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay (aHR 0.82 [0.72-0.94]). Following implementation, a reduction in subsequent myocardial infarction or death was observed in patients with non-ischemic myocardial injury (aHR 0·83 [0·75-0·91]), but not in those with type 1 or type 2 myocardial infarction (aHR 0·92 [0·83-1·01] and 0·98 [0·84-1·14]).Conclusions: In patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, implementation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay reduced the risk of subsequent myocardial infarction or death at 5 years in those reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay. Improvements in outcome were greatest in patients with non-ischemic myocardial injury suggesting a broader benefit beyond the identification of myocardial infarction.<br/

Prevalence of MRI lesions in men responding to a GP-led invitation for a prostate health check: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: In men with a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA), MRI increases the detection of clinically significant cancer and reduces overdiagnosis, with fewer biopsies. MRI as a screening tool has not been assessed independently of PSA in a formal screening study. We report a systematic community-based assessment of the prevalence of prostate MRI lesions in an age-selected population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Men aged 50–75 were identified from participating general practice (GP) practices and randomly selected for invitation to a screening MRI and PSA. Men with a positive MRI or a raised PSA density (≥0.12 ng/mL2) were recommended for standard National Health Service (NHS) prostate cancer assessment. RESULTS: Eight GP practices sent invitations to 2096 men. 457 men (22%) responded and 303 completed both screening tests. Older white men were most likely to respond to the invitation, with black men having 20% of the acceptance rate of white men. One in six men (48/303 men, 16%) had a positive screening MRI, and an additional 1 in 20 men (16/303, 5%) had a raised PSA density alone. After NHS assessment, 29 men (9.6%) were diagnosed with clinically significant cancer and 3 men (1%) with clinically insignificant cancer. Two in three men with a positive MRI, and more than half of men with clinically significant disease had a PSA <3 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate MRI may have value in screening independently of PSA. These data will allow modelling of the use of MRI as a primary screening tool to inform larger prostate cancer screening studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04063566

Implementation of a high sensitivity cardiac troponin i assay and risk of myocardial infarction or death at five years:Observational analysis of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the impact of implementing a high sensitivity assay for cardiac troponin I on long term outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Design: Secondary observational analysis of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: 10 secondary and tertiary care centres in Scotland, UK. Participants: 48 282 consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Myocardial injury was defined as any high sensitivity assay result for cardiac troponin I &gt;99th centile of 16 ng/L in women and 34 ng/L in men. Intervention: Hospital sites were randomly allocated to either early (n=5 hospitals) or late (n=5 hospitals) implementation of a high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay with sex specific diagnostic thresholds. Main outcome measure: The main outcome was myocardial infarction or death at five years. Results: 10 360 patients had cardiac troponin concentrations greater than the 99th centile, of whom 1771 (17.1%) were reclassified by the high sensitivity assay. The five year incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction or death before and after implementation of the high sensitivity assay was 29.4% (5588/18 978) v 25.9% (7591/29 304), respectively, in all patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.01), and 63.0% (456/720) v 53.9% (567/1051), respectively, in those reclassified by the high sensitivity assay (0.82, 0.72 to 0.94). After implementation of the high sensitivity assay, a reduction in subsequent myocardial infarction or death was observed in patients with non-ischaemic myocardial injury (0.83, 0.75 to 0.91) but not in those with type 1 or type 2 myocardial infarction (0.92, 0.83 to 1.01 and 0.98, 0.84 to 1.14). Conclusions: Implementation of a high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay in the assessment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent myocardial infarction or death at five years in those reclassified by the high sensitivity assay. Improvements in outcome were greatest in patients with non-ischaemic myocardial injury, suggesting a broader benefit beyond the identification of myocardial infarction. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01852123.</p

Understanding and managing patchy data in the UK museum sector

It is well accepted that the museum sector has a longstanding problem with data collection and management. This article begins by exploring problems with gaining access to data, poor archiving and coverage, and the absence of data. We then explain how the Mapping Museums research team set out to remedy the lack of longitudinal data on the UK museum sector in the period between 1960 and 2020. Initially we collated and supplemented existing information on UK museums but it was impossible to fill some gaps or resolve some inconsistencies in the data. Here we discuss how we designed a database that was sensitive to the patchiness of the material, and that could model uncertain and absent data in computational terms. To close, we briefly comment on how our data enables research on museum history and on how the problems with data collection in the sector might be remedied in the longer term

High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays permit use of lower thresholds for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, but whether this improves clinical outcomes is unknown. We aimed to determine whether the introduction of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with a sex-specific 99th centile diagnostic threshold would reduce subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: In this stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial across ten secondary or tertiary care hospitals in Scotland, we evaluated the implementation of an hs-cTnI assay in consecutive patients who had been admitted to the hospitals' emergency departments with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they presented with suspected acute coronary syndrome and had paired cardiac troponin measurements from the standard care and trial assays. During a validation phase of 6-12 months, results from the hs-cTnI assay were concealed from the attending clinician, and a contemporary cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay was used to guide care. Hospitals were randomly allocated to early (n=5 hospitals) or late (n=5 hospitals) implementation, in which the high-sensitivity assay and sex-specific 99th centile diagnostic threshold was introduced immediately after the 6-month validation phase or was deferred for a further 6 months. Patients reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay were defined as those with an increased hs-cTnI concentration in whom cTnI concentrations were below the diagnostic threshold on the contemporary assay. The primary outcome was subsequent myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular causes at 1 year after initial presentation. Outcomes were compared in patients reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay before and after its implementation by use of an adjusted generalised linear mixed model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01852123. FINDINGS: Between June 10, 2013, and March 3, 2016, we enrolled 48 282 consecutive patients (61 [SD 17] years, 47% women) of whom 10 360 (21%) patients had cTnI concentrations greater than those of the 99th centile of the normal range of values, who were identified by the contemporary assay or the high-sensitivity assay. The high-sensitivity assay reclassified 1771 (17%) of 10 360 patients with myocardial injury or infarction who were not identified by the contemporary assay. In those reclassified, subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death within 1 year occurred in 105 (15%) of 720 patients in the validation phase and 131 (12%) of 1051 patients in the implementation phase (adjusted odds ratio for implementation vs validation phase 1·10, 95% CI 0·75 to 1·61; p=0·620). INTERPRETATION: Use of a high-sensitivity assay prompted reclassification of 1771 (17%) of 10 360 patients with myocardial injury or infarction, but was not associated with a lower subsequent incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death at 1 year. Our findings question whether the diagnostic threshold for myocardial infarction should be based on the 99th centile derived from a normal reference population. FUNDING: The British Heart Foundation

Rheumatoid arthritis - clinical aspects: 134. Predictors of Joint Damage in South Africans with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes progressive joint damage and functional disability. Studies on factors affecting joint damage as clinical outcome are lacking in Africa. The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of joint damage in adult South Africans with established RA. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 100 black patients with RA of >5 years were assessed for joint damage using a validated clinical method, the RA articular damage (RAAD) score. Potential predictors of joint damage that were documented included socio-demographics, smoking, body mass index (BMI), disease duration, delay in disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) initiation, global disease activity as measured by the disease activity score (DAS28), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), and autoantibody status. The predictive value of variables was assessed by univariate and stepwise multivariate regression analyses. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean (SD) age was 56 (9.8) years, disease duration 17.5 (8.5) years, educational level 7.5 (3.5) years and DMARD lag was 9 (8.8) years. Female to male ratio was 10:1. The mean (SD) DAS28 was 4.9 (1.5) and total RAAD score was 28.3 (12.8). The mean (SD) BMI was 27.2 kg/m2 (6.2) and 93% of patients were rheumatoid factor (RF) positive. More than 90% of patients received between 2 to 3 DMARDs. Significant univariate predictors of a poor RAAD score were increasing age (p = 0.001), lower education level (p = 0.019), longer disease duration (p < 0.001), longer DMARD lag (p = 0.014), lower BMI (p = 0.025), high RF titre (p < 0.001) and high ESR (p = 0.008). The multivariate regression analysis showed that the only independent significant predictors of a higher mean RAAD score were older age at disease onset (p = 0.04), disease duration (p < 0.001) and RF titre (p < 0.001). There was also a negative association between BMI and the mean total RAAD score (p = 0.049). Conclusions: Patients with longstanding established RA have more severe irreversible joint damage as measured by the clinical RAAD score, contrary to other studies in Africa. This is largely reflected by a delay in the initiation of early effective treatment. Independent of disease duration, older age at disease onset and a higher RF titre are strongly associated with more joint damage. The inverse association between BMI and articular damage in RA has been observed in several studies using radiographic damage scores. The mechanisms underlying this paradoxical association are still widely unknown but adipokines have recently been suggested to play a role. Disclosure statement: C.I. has received a research grant from the Connective Tissue Diseases Research Fund, University of the Witwatersrand. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interes

Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of INEBRIA

CITATION: Watson, R., et al. 2016. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of INEBRIA. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 11:13, doi:10.1186/s13722-016-0062-9.The original publication is available at https://ascpjournal.biomedcentral.comENGLISH SUMMARY : Meeting abstracts.https://ascpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13722-016-0062-9Publisher's versio

The struggle is real: dealing with real world data in clinical trials

Background The recently published High-STEACS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01852123) was a randomised controlled trial, enrolling 48,282 patients between June 2013 and June 2016. The trial’s objective was to determine if implementation of a new high-sensitivity troponin assay would improve outcomes in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome to hospital emergency departments across Scotland. The trial was unusual in that it made use of routine electronic health care data in unconsented patients. This presented a number of data management and governance challenges in the reporting of the trial. Methods The High-STEACS trial accessed routine electronic health care data sources from ten hospitals in two NHS health boards and national datasets in Scotland. Participant data were linked across twelve distinct data sources using the participant CHI (Community Health Index) number as a unique identifier. The study had ethical and local management approval in addition to approval from the Patient Benefit and Privacy Panel approval for record linkage. Data extraction was supported by the NHS Safe Haven of each health board and all eligible patients were assigned a unique study ID prior to the removal of identifiable participant data. De-identified data from each health board were transferred to the NHS Lothian Safe Haven’s secure analysis platform, hosted by the Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research. Data were combined into a single database for statistical analyses. The combined, linked study dataset was accessible only to approved individuals. Results The reporting of the High-STEACS trial presented a number of challenges not encountered in the reporting of a conventional randomised controlled trial. The use of data from electronic health records without individual patient consent allows the research question to be addressed in the whole patient population but requires rigorous data governance processes. The data linkage process was complex – collection of the correct data during the correct timeframe from multiple data sources within a single health board was challenging. This was compounded by then needing the variables in both health boards to map directly to the final combined dataset. As well as the challenges of mapping variables across health boards, a process had to be set up to ensure that patients who may have been seen at different times in both health boards were not included in the combined dataset twice. Conclusions The High-STEACS trial is one of the first of its kind to include this number of patients via routinely collected healthcare data. The strength of this approach was the ability to identify all patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, rather than limiting findings to a selected, possibly unrepresentative, group as would be the case for a conventional randomised controlled trial. Access to routine healthcare data enabled the creation of a ‘meta database’ by drawing on a number of raw NHS data sources and linking them in a secure manner. It is important to recognise the challenges in processing and ensuring accuracy of these large datasets while meeting governance and privacy standards required for unconsented data