10 research outputs found

    Epidemiological profile and north-south gradient driving baseline systemic involvement of primary Sjögren's syndrome

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE To characterize the systemic phenotype of primary Sjögren’s syndrome at diagnosis by analysing the EULAR-SS disease activity index (ESSDAI) scores. METHODS The Sjögren Big Data Consortium is an international, multicentre registry based on worldwide data-sharing cooperative merging of pre-existing databases from leading centres in clinical research in Sjögren’s syndrome from the five continents. RESULTS The cohort included 10 007 patients (9352 female, mean 53 years) with recorded ESSDAI scores available. At diagnosis, the mean total ESSDAI score was 6.1; 81.8% of patients had systemic activity (ESSDAI score ≥1). Males had a higher mean ESSDAI (8.1 vs 6.0, P 65 years, P < 0.001). The highest global ESSDAI score was reported in Black/African Americans, followed by White, Asian and Hispanic patients (6.7, 6.5, 5.4 and 4.8, respectively; P < 0.001). The frequency of involvement of each systemic organ also differed between ethnic groups, with Black/African American patients showing the highest frequencies in the lymphadenopathy, articular, peripheral nervous system, CNS and biological domains, White patients in the glandular, cutaneous and muscular domains, Asian patients in the pulmonary, renal and haematological domains and Hispanic patients in the constitutional domain. Systemic activity measured by the ESSDAI, clinical ESSDAI (clinESSDAI) and disease activity states was higher in patients from southern countries (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The systemic phenotype of primary Sjögren’s syndrome is strongly influenced by personal determinants such as age, gender, ethnicity and place of residence, which are key geoepidemiological players in driving the expression of systemic disease at diagnosis

    Authors’ reply

    No full text

    Bilateral deep keratitis caused by systemic lupus erythematosus

    No full text
    We report the optical and ultrasonic biomicroscopy and confocal microscopy findings in bilateral stromal keratitis (keratoendotheliitis), a rare ocular manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Examination revealed deposits with polyrefringent crystals. Topical corticosteroid produced regression of the corneal edema, but there was an increase in corneal opacity. Ultrasound biomicroscopy images confirmed the deep location of the corneal opacities, and confocal microscopy showed a disruption of the corneal stroma and crystal-like bodies.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Reumatol, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Santo Amaro, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Dermatol, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Calif Davis, Dept Ophthalmol, Davis, CA 95616 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Reumatol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Dermatol, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

    Práticas baseadas em evidências publicadas no Brasil: identificação e análise de suas vertentes e abordagens metodológicas

    Get PDF
    Revisão integrativa de estudos brasileiros sobre práticas baseadas em evidências (PBE) em saúde, publicados em periódicos ISI/JCR, nos últimos 10 anos. O objetivo foi identificar as especialidades que mais realizaram estes estudos, seus enfoques e abordagens metodológicas. A partir de critérios de inclusão, foram selecionados 144 trabalhos. Os resultados indicam que a maior quantidade de estudos feitos em PBE foram sobre infância e adolescência, infectologia, psiquiatria/saúde mental e cirurgia. Os enfoques predominantes foram prevenção, tratamento/reabilitação, diagnóstico e avaliação. As metodologias mais empregadas foram revisão sistemática sem ou com metanálise, revisão de protocolos ou síntese de estudos de evidências já disponíveis, e revisão integrativa. Constata-se forte expansão multiprofissional da PBE no Brasil, contribuindo para a busca de práticas mais criteriosas pela reunião, reconhecimento e análise crítica dos conhecimentos produzidos. O estudo contribui também para a própria análise dos modos de fazer pesquisa e novas possibilidades de investigação
    corecore