Telemonitoring for Patients With COVID-19:Recommendations for Design and Implementation

Despite significant efforts, the COVID-19 pandemic has put enormous pressure on health care systems around the world, threatening the quality of patient care. Telemonitoring offers the opportunity to carefully monitor patients with a confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19 from home and allows for the timely identification of worsening symptoms. Additionally, it may decrease the number of hospital visits and admissions, thereby reducing the use of scarce resources, optimizing health care capacity, and minimizing the risk of viral transmission. In this paper, we present a COVID-19 telemonitoring care pathway developed at a tertiary care hospital in the Netherlands, which combined the monitoring of vital parameters with video consultations for adequate clinical assessment. Additionally, we report a series of medical, scientific, organizational, and ethical recommendations that may be used as a guide for the design and implementation of telemonitoring pathways for COVID-19 and other diseases worldwide

ESC Working Group on e-Cardiology Position Paper: Use of Commercially Available Wearable Technology for Heart Rate and Activity Tracking in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

Commercially available health technologies such as smartphones and smartwatches, activity trackers and eHealth applications, commonly referred to as wearables, are increasingly available and used both in the leisure and healthcare sector for pulse and fitness/ activity tracking. The aim of the Position Paper is to identify specific barriers and knowledge gaps for the use of wearables, in particular for heart rate and activity tracking, in clinical cardiovascular healthcare to support their implementation into clinical care. The widespread use of heart rate and fitness tracking technologies provides unparalleled opportunities for capturing physiological information from large populations in the community, which has previously only been available in patient populations in the setting of healthcare provision. The availability of low-cost and high-volume physiological data from the community also provides unique challenges. While the number of patients meeting healthcare providers with data from wearables is rapidly growing, there are at present no clinical guidelines on how and when to use data from wearables in primary and secondary prevention. Technical aspects of heart rate tracking especially during activity need to be further validated. How to analyze, translate, and interpret large datasets of information into clinically applicable recommendations needs further consideration. While the current users of wearable technologies tend to be young, healthy and in the higher sociodemographic strata, wearables could potentially have a greater utility in the elderly and higher risk population. Wearables may also provide a benefit through increased health awareness, democratization of health data and patient engagement. Use of continuous monitoring may provide opportunities for detection of risk factors and disease development earlier in the causal pathway, which may provide novel applications in both prevention and clinical research. However, wearables may also have potential adverse consequences due to unintended modification of behaviour, uncertain use and interpretation of large physiological data, a possible increase in social inequality due to differential access and technological literacy, challenges with regulatory bodies and privacy issues. In the present position paper, current applications as well as specific barriers and gaps in knowledge are identified and discussed in order to support the implementation of wearable technologies from gadget-ology into clinical cardiology

Evidence of a Polygenic Origin of Extreme High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels-Brief Report

<p>Objective-There are several known monogenic causes of high and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, but traditional sequencing studies have had limited success in identifying mutations in the majority of individuals with extreme HDL-C levels. The aim of this study was to assess the power of a targeted high-throughput sequencing strategy to elucidate the genetic basis of extreme HDL-C phenotypes.</p><p>Approach and Results-We sequenced 195 genes with either established or implicated roles in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism plus 78 lipid-unrelated genes in patients with HDL-C 99th (n=40) percentile values, and the results were compared with those of 498 individuals representative of the Dutch general population and 95 subjects with normal HDL-C (between 40th and 60th percentile values). The extreme HDL cohort carried more rare nonsynonymous variants in the lipid geneset than both the general population (odds ratio, 1.39; P=0.019) and normal HDL-C (odds ratio, 1.43; P=0.040) cohorts. The prevalence of such variants in the lipid-related and lipid-unrelated genesets was similar in the control groups, indicative of equal mutation rates. In the extreme HDL cohort, however, there was enrichment of rare nonsynonymous variants in the lipid versus the control geneset (odds ratio, 2.23; P= 2 and >= 5 rare variants.</p><p>Conclusions-This study suggests that most extreme HDL-C phenotypes have a polygenic origin.</p>

Hyperlactataemia in HIV-infected patients: the role of NRTI-treatment

BACKGROUND: Long-term treatment with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) can induce mitochondrial dysfunction, most severely represented by lactic acidosis. Diagnostic tests for mitochondrial dysfunction are lacking, although persistently elevated serum lactate might be a surrogate marker. OBJECTIVES: To determine the occurrence of hyperlactataemia in HIV-infected patients on NRTI-treatment and to evaluate the possible risk factors. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of lactic-acid levels in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients. Hyperlactactaemia was considered mild if between 2.0-5 mmol/l, serious if >5 mmol/l and lactic acidosis was defined as lactic acid levels >5 mmol/l with bicarbonate <20 mmol/l. Possible risk factors, such as current and preceding NRTI-treatment as well as treatment with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors and concurrent liver disease, were analysed. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty three asymptomatic HIV-infected patients were studied, including 174 patients (78%) on NRTI treatment, 12 patients (5%) treated without NRTIs and 37 patients (17%) not treated. Mild hyperlactataemia was found in 42 patients (19%), from whom 38/42 (90%) were NRTI-treated and the remaining patients (4/42, 10%) received no treatment (chi2, P <0.05). The significant risk factors for hyperlactataemia in the univariate analysis were NRTI-treatment as a group (P=0.03) and elevated ALT (P=0.008). In multivariate analysis NRTI use (P=0.05) and ALT level (P=0.03) remained a significant determinant of hyperlactataemia. Among the different individual NRTIs, a stavudine-containing (P=0.004) and a zalcitabine-containing (P=0.07) regimen were most notably associated with the development of hyperlactataemia, whereas for the combinations of NRTIs, such association was only found for stavudine/lamivudine (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A correlation between hyperlactataemia and NRTI treatment was found, but the value of routine lactate measurement for individual treatment monitoring remains uncertai

ESC working group on e-cardiology position paper: use of commercially available wearable technology for heart rate and activity tracking in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention-in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals, Patient Forum, and the Digital Health Committee.

Commercially available health technologies such as smartphones and smartwatches, activity trackers and eHealth applications, commonly referred to as wearables, are increasingly available and used both in the leisure and healthcare sector for pulse and fitness/activity tracking. The aim of the Position Paper is to identify specific barriers and knowledge gaps for the use of wearables, in particular for heart rate (HR) and activity tracking, in clinical cardiovascular healthcare to support their implementation into clinical care. The widespread use of HR and fitness tracking technologies provides unparalleled opportunities for capturing physiological information from large populations in the community, which has previously only been available in patient populations in the setting of healthcare provision. The availability of low-cost and high-volume physiological data from the community also provides unique challenges. While the number of patients meeting healthcare providers with data from wearables is rapidly growing, there are at present no clinical guidelines on how and when to use data from wearables in primary and secondary prevention. Technical aspects of HR tracking especially during activity need to be further validated. How to analyse, translate, and interpret large datasets of information into clinically applicable recommendations needs further consideration. While the current users of wearable technologies tend to be young, healthy and in the higher sociodemographic strata, wearables could potentially have a greater utility in the elderly and higher-risk population. Wearables may also provide a benefit through increased health awareness, democratization of health data and patient engagement. Use of continuous monitoring may provide opportunities for detection of risk factors and disease development earlier in the causal pathway, which may provide novel applications in both prevention and clinical research. However, wearables may also have potential adverse consequences due to unintended modification of behaviour, uncertain use and interpretation of large physiological data, a possible increase in social inequality due to differential access and technological literacy, challenges with regulatory bodies and privacy issues. In the present position paper, current applications as well as specific barriers and gaps in knowledge are identified and discussed in order to support the implementation of wearable technologies from gadget-ology into clinical cardiology.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

WR-2721 (Amifostine) Ameliorates Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss But Causes Neurotoxicity In Hamsters: Dose-Dependent Effects

Chemoprotective agents reduce the toxic side effects of chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin. The conventional belief is that the chemoprotective agent WR-2721 (Amifostine), while protecting against most cisplatin-induced side effects, does not protect against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity (i.e., hearing loss). There is no knowledge, however, about the efficacy of high doses of WR-2721 (WR) in possibly protecting against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Thus, the dose-dependent effects of WR in possibly ameliorating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were investigated. Hamsters were given a series of 5 cisplatin injections (3 mg/kg/injection once every other day, i.p.) either alone or in combination with 18, 40, 80, or 400 mg/kg/injection of the rescue agent WR (n = 5 or 10/group). Other groups received either 80 mg/kg/injection WR alone (n = 5) or were untreated (n = 14). Ototoxicity was assessed by auditory brain stem responses (ABR). WR provided dose-dependent rescue from cisplatin’s ototoxicity with no protection at the low dose of 18 mg/kg, moderate protection at 40 mg/kg, and nearly complete protection at 80 and 400 mg/kg. However, WR doses of 40 mg/kg or higher caused neurotoxicity as evidenced by prolongations in the ABR’s interpeak latencies. Thus, high doses of WR provided the beneficial effect of protecting against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, but had the harmful side effect of neurotoxicity. Previous failures to find chemoprotection from cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were likely due to the use of WR doses that were too small. The clinical implications of the beneficial and harmful effects of high doses of WR are discussed