Inhibition of DDR1 enhances in vivo chemosensitivity in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma

Platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors is the current standard of care for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, tumor progression evolves in most cases. Therefore, predictive bioma ricers are needed for better patient stratification and for the identification of new therapeutic strategies, including enhancing the efficacy of chemotoxic agents. Here, we hypothesized that discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1) may be both a predictive factor for chemoresistance in patients with LUAD and a potential target positively selected in resistant cells. By using biopsies from patients with LUAD, KRAS-mutant LUAD cell lines, and in vivo genetically engineered KRAS-driven mouse models, we evaluated the role of DDR1 in the context of chemotherapy treatment. We found that DORT is upregulated during chemotherapy both in vitro and in viva. Moreover, analysis of a cohort of patients with LUAD suggested that high DOR1 levels in pretreatment biopsies correlated with poor response to chemotherapy. Additionally, we showed that combining DORI inhibition with chemotherapy prompted a synergistic therapeutic effect and enhanced cell death of KRAS-mutant tumors in vivo. Collectively, this study suggests a potential role for DDR1 as both a predictive and prognostic biomarker, potentially improving the chemotherapy response of patients with LUAD

Generation and Characterization of a New Preclinical Mouse Model of EGFR-Driven Lung Cancer with MET-Induced Osimertinib Resistance

Despite the introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to treat advanced lung cancer harboring EGFR-activating mutations, the prognosis remains unfavorable because of intrinsic and/or acquired resistance. We generated a new state-of-the-art mouse strain harboring the human EGFRT790M/L858R oncogene and MET overexpression (EGFR/MET strain) that mimics the MET amplification occurring in one out of five patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer that relapsed after treatment with osimertinib, a third-generation anti-EGFR TKI. We found that survival was reduced in EGFR/MET mice compared with mice harboring only EGFRT790M/L858R (EGFR strain). Moreover, EGFR/MET-driven lung tumors were resistant to osimertinib, recapitulating the phenotype observed in patients. Conversely, as also observed in patients, the crizotinib (anti-MET TKI) and osimertinib combination improved survival and reduced tumor burden in EGFR/MET mice, further validating the model’s value for preclinical studies. We also found that in EGFR/MET mice, MET overexpression negatively regulated EGFR activity through MIG6 induction, a compensatory mechanism that allows the coexistence of the two onco-genic events. Our data suggest that single EGFR or MET inhibition might not be a good therapeutic option for EGFR-mutated lung cancer with MET amplification, and that inhibition of both pathways should be the best clinical choice in these patients

Therapeutic indications and metabolic effects of metreleptin in patients with lipodystrophy syndromes: Real-life experience from a national reference network

International audienceAim: To describe baseline characteristics and follow-up data in patients with lipodystrophy syndromes treated with metreleptin in a national reference network, in a real-life setting.Patients and methods: Clinical and metabolic data from patients receiving metreleptin in France were retrospectively collected, at baseline, at 1 year and at the latest follow-up during treatment.Results: Forty-seven patients with lipodystrophy including generalized lipodystrophy (GLD; n = 28) and partial lipodystrophy (PLD; n = 19) received metreleptin over the last decade. At baseline, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient age was 29.3 (16.6-47.6) years, body mass index was 23.8 (21.2-25.7) kg/m2 and serum leptin was 3.2 (1.0-4.9) ng/mL, 94% of patients had diabetes (66% insulin-treated), 53% had hypertension and 87% had dyslipidaemia. Metreleptin therapy, administered for a median (IQR) of 31.7 (14.2-76.0) months, was ongoing in 77% of patients at the latest follow-up. In patients with GLD, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting triglyceride levels significantly decreased from baseline to 1 year of metreleptin treatment, from 8.4 (6.5-9.9)% [68 (48-85) mmol/mol] to 6.8 (5.6-7.4)% [51(38-57) mmol/mol], and 3.6 (1.7-8.5) mmol/L to 2.2 (1.1-3.7) mmol/L, respectively (P < 0.001), with sustained efficacy thereafter. In patients with PLD, HbA1c was not significantly modified (7.7 [7.1-9.1]% [61 (54-76) mmol/mol] at baseline vs. 7.7 [7.4-9.5]% [61(57-80) mmol/mol] at 1 year), and the decrease in fasting triglycerides (from 3.3 [1.9-9.9] mmol/L to 2.5 [1.6-5.3] mmol/L; P < 0.01) was not confirmed at the latest assessment (5.2 [2.2-11.3] mmol/L). However, among PLD patients, at 1 year, 61% were responders regarding glucose homeostasis, with lower baseline leptin levels compared to nonresponders, and 61% were responders regarding triglyceridaemia. Liver enzymes significantly decreased only in the GLD group.Conclusions: In this real-life setting study, metabolic outcomes are improved by metreleptin therapy in patients with GLD. The therapeutic indication for metreleptin needs to be clarified in patients with PLD