27 research outputs found

    Designing Public Transport To Foster Patronage And Social Inclusion

    Get PDF
    Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies. Faculty of Economics and Business. The University of Sydne

    Does Fluoride in Compomers Prevent Future Caries in Children?

    No full text
    Compomer restorations release fluoride to help prevent future caries. We tested the hypothesis that compomer is associated with fewer future caries compared with amalgam. The five-year New England Children’s Amalgam Trial recruited 534 children aged 6-10 yrs with ≥ 2 carious posterior teeth. Children were randomized to receive compomer or amalgam restorations in primary posterior teeth, placed with a fluoride-releasing bonding agent. The association between restorative material and future caries was assessed by survival analysis. Average follow-up of restorations (N = 1085 compomer, 954 amalgams) was 2.8 ± 1.4 yrs in 441 children. No significant difference between materials was found in the rate of new caries on different surfaces of the same tooth. Incident caries on other teeth appeared slightly more quickly after placement of compomer restorations (p = 0.007), but the difference was negligible after 5 yrs. Under the conditions of this trial, we found no preventive benefit to fluoride-releasing compomer compared with amalgam

    Technical Report: Correlation Between the Repair of Cartilage and Subchondral Bone in an Osteochondral Defect Using Bilayered, Biodegradable Hydrogel Composites

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 152781.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)The present work investigated correlations between cartilage and subchondral bone repair, facilitated by a growth factor-delivering scaffold, in a rabbit osteochondral defect model. Histological scoring indices and microcomputed tomography morphological parameters were used to evaluate cartilage and bone repair, respectively, at 6 and 12 weeks. Correlation analysis revealed significant associations between specific cartilage indices and subchondral bone parameters that varied with location in the defect (cortical vs. trabecular region), time point (6 vs. 12 weeks), and experimental group (insulin-like growth factor-1 only, bone morphogenetic protein-2 only, or both growth factors). In particular, significant correlations consistently existed between cartilage surface regularity and bone quantity parameters. Overall, correlation analysis between cartilage and bone repair provided a fuller understanding of osteochondral repair and can help drive informed studies for future osteochondral regeneration strategies

    Osteochondral defect repair using bilayered hydrogels encapsulating both chondrogenically and osteogenically pre-differentiated mesenchymal stem cells in a rabbit model

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 136446.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of cell-laden bilayered hydrogels encapsulating chondrogenically and osteogenically (OS) pre-differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to effect osteochondral defect repair in a rabbit model. By varying the period of chondrogenic pre-differentiation from 7 (CG7) to 14 days (CG14), the effect of chondrogenic differentiation stage on osteochondral tissue repair was also investigated. METHODS: Rabbit MSCs were subjected to either chondrogenic or osteogenic pre-differentiation, encapsulated within respective chondral/subchondral layers of a bilayered hydrogel construct, and then implanted into femoral condyle osteochondral defects. Rabbits were randomized into one of four groups (MSC/MSC, MSC/OS, CG7/OS, and CG14/OS; chondral/subchondral) and received two similar constructs bilaterally. Defects were evaluated after 12 weeks. RESULTS: All groups exhibited similar overall neo-tissue filling. The delivery of OS cells when compared to undifferentiated MSCs in the subchondral construct layer resulted in improvements in neo-cartilage thickness and regularity. However, the addition of CG cells in the chondral layer, with OS cells in the subchondral layer, did not augment tissue repair as influenced by the latter when compared to the control. Instead, CG7/OS implants resulted in more irregular neo-tissue surfaces when compared to MSC/OS implants. Notably, the delivery of CG7 cells, when compared to CG14 cells, with OS cells stimulated morphologically superior cartilage repair. However, neither osteogenic nor chondrogenic pre-differentiation affected detectable changes in subchondral tissue repair. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage regeneration in osteochondral defects can be enhanced by MSCs that are chondrogenically and osteogenically pre-differentiated prior to implantation. Longer chondrogenic pre-differentiation periods, however, lead to diminished cartilage repair
    corecore