Devices for Prevention of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice and, although its importance has been underestimated even in recent years, we are now becoming aware of its clinical transcendence1,2,3. The classical treatment is pharmacological, but its efficacy is limited and it does have side effects4,5. Therefore, in recent years, there has been an increasing interest in other types of non-pharmacological treatments6,7. Physiologic cardiac pacing has proven to be more effective than VVI mode pacing to prevent the occurrence of AF during the follow-up of patients who have had a permanent pacemaker implanted 8,9,10. There are currently different lines of research that use different atrial pacing techniques to prevent and treat episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation11,12. Techniques of multi-site pacing in the right atrium or both atria, new atrial pacing sites, prevention algorithms for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes, and even high-frequency atrial tachyarrhythmia termination algorithms have all been proposed. In this article, we will try to synthesize the grounds for and findings of the different lines of research currently being developed

Cryoballoon Ablation for Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Procedural Differences and Results from the Spanish Registry (RECABA)

Introduction: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has become a standard treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PaAF) but limited data is available for outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Methods: We analyzed the first 944 patients included in the Spanish Prospective Multi-center Observation Post-market Registry to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing CBA for PeAF versus PaAF. Results: A total of 944 patients (57.8 ± 10.4 years; 70.1% male) with AF (27.9% persistent) were prospectively included from 25 centers. PeAF patients were more likely to have structural heart disease (67.7 vs. 11.4%; p < 0.001) and left atrium dilation (72.6 vs. 43.3%; p < 0.001). CBA of PeAF was less likely to be performed under general anesthesia (10.7 vs. 22.2%; p < 0.001), with an arterial line (32.2 vs. 44.6%; p < 0.001) and assisted transeptal puncture (11.9 vs. 17.9%; p = 0.025). During an application, PeAF patients had a longer time to −30 ◦C (35.91 ± 14.20 vs. 34.93 ± 12.87 s; p = 0.021) and a colder balloon nadir temperature during vein isolation (−35.04 ± 9.58 vs. −33.61 ± 10.32 ◦C; p = 0.004), but received fewer bonus freeze applications (30.7 vs. 41.1%; p < 0.001). There were no differences in acute pulmonary vein isolation and procedure-related complications. Overall, 76.7% of patients were free from AF recurrences at 15-month follow-up (78.9% in PaAF vs. 70.9% in PeAF; p = 0.09). Conclusions: Patients with PeAF have a more diseased substrate, and CBA procedures performed in such patients were more simplified, although longer/colder freeze applications were often applied. The acute efficacy/safety profile of CBA was similar between PaAF and PeAF patients, but long-term results were better in PaAF patients

Evaluación clínica e histológica de imiquimod a 5% en crema vs 5-fluorouracilo a 5% en ungüento en pacientes con queratosis actínicas en la cara

Antecedentes: existen diferentes modalidades terapéuticas contra las queratosis actínicas, como criocirugía, curetaje, 5-fluorouracilo, imiquimod, dermoabrasión, quimioexfoliación, láser, ácido retinoico, alfa hidroxiácidos y terapia fotodinámica. Actualmente no existe un algoritmo de tratamiento debido a la falta de suficientes estudios comparativos. Objetivo: comparar la respuesta clínica e histológica y la satisfacción cosmética con imiquimod a 5% en crema vs 5-fluorouracilo (5-FU) a 5% en ungüento en pacientes tratados por queratosis actínicas en la cara. Pacientes y método: 30 pacientes se distribuyeron al azar para recibir 5-FU a 5% en ungüento (n = 15) o imiquimod a 5% en crema (n = 15), aplicados -respectivamente- dos veces al día durante tres semanas y tres veces por semana durante cuatro semanas; después de un periodo de descanso de cuatro semanas repetir, en caso necesario, un segundo ciclo. La evaluación clínica se hizo comparando fotografías tomadas al inicio y al término del tratamiento, con ayuda de tres evaluadores cegados al estudio. Las variables evaluadas fueron: eritema, costra, escama, erosión, edema, exudado, vesículas. Se realizó conteo manual de las lesiones y análisis histológico antes y después del tratamiento y se aplicó una encuesta de satisfacción cosmética al término del tratamiento. Resultados: antes, durante y al término del tratamiento no hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa en el número de queratosis actínicas entre ambos grupos (p › 0.05). Ambos grupos quedaron satisfechos con el tratamiento asignado. El eritema predominó en el grupo de pacientes tratados con 5-FU, mientras que el edema predominó en los pacientes tratados con imiquimod. Desde el punto de vista histológico, no hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa. Conclusión: en ambos grupos la respuesta clínica e histológica y la satisfacción cosmética fueron similares (p › 0.05)

Genome-wide linkage analysis of congenital heart defects using MOD score analysis identifies two novel loci

Background: Congenital heart defects (CHD) is the most common cause of death from a congenital structure abnormality in newborns and is often associated with fetal loss. There are many types of CHD. Human genetic studies have identified genes that are responsible for the inheritance of a particular type of CHD and for some types of CHD previously thought to be sporadic. However, occasionally different members of the same family might have anatomically distinct defects — for instance, one member with atrial septal defect, one with tetralogy of Fallot, and one with ventricular septal defect. Our objective is to identify susceptibility loci for CHD in families affected by distinct defects. The occurrence of these apparently discordant clinical phenotypes within one family might hint at a genetic framework common to most types of CHD. Results: We performed a genome-wide linkage analysis using MOD score analysis in families with diverse CHD. Significant linkage was obtained in two regions, at chromosome 15 (15q26.3, Pempirical = 0.0004) and at chromosome 18 (18q21.2, Pempirical = 0.0005). Conclusions: In these two novel regions four candidate genes are located: SELS, SNRPA1, and PCSK6 on 15q26.3, and TCF4 on 18q21.2. The new loci reported here have not previously been described in connection with CHD. Although further studies in other cohorts are needed to confirm these findings, the results presented here together with recent insight into how the heart normally develops will improve the understanding of CHDThis study was supported by the grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (08–1363 and 11–0699) of the Spanish Ministry of Health and by grant Str643/4-1 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)

Time to –30°C as a predictor of acute success during cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background: Freezing rate of second-generation cryoballoon (CB) is a biophysical parameter that could assist pulmonary vein isolation. The aim of this study is to assess freezing rate (time to reach –30°C ([TT-30C]) as an early predictor of acute pulmonary vein isolation using the CB. Methods: Biophysical data from CB freeze applications within a multicenter, nation-wide CB ablation registry were gathered. Successful application (SA), was defined as achieving durable intraprocedural vein isolation with time to isolation in under 60 s (SA-TTI&lt;60) as achieving durable vein isolation in under 60 s. Logistic regressions were performed and predictive models were built for the data set. Results: 12,488 CB applications from 1,733 atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures were included within 27 centers from a Spanish CB AF ablation registry. SA was achieved in 6,349 of 9,178 (69.2%) total freeze applications, and SA-TTI&lt;60 was obtained in 2,673 of 4,784 (55.9%) freezes and electrogram monitoring was present. TT-30C was shorter in the SA group (33.4 ± 9.2 vs 39.3 ± 12.1 s; p &lt; 0.001) and SA-TTI&lt;60 group (31.8 ± 7.6 vs. 38.5 ± 11.5 s; p &lt; 0.001). Also, a 10 s increase in TT-30C was associated with a 41% reduction in the odds for an SA (odds ratio [OR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–0.63) and a 57% reduction in the odds for achieving SA-TTI&lt;60 (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.39–0.49), when corrected for electrogram visualization, vein position, and application order. Conclusions: Time to reach –30°C is an early predictor of the quality of a CB application and can be used to guide the ablation procedure even in the absence of electrogram monitoring.

Repeat cryoablation as a redo procedure for atrial fibrillation ablation: Is it a good choice?

Background: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), both cryoablation ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), have demonstrated to be safe and effective. About 1 in 3 patients may face a redo due to recurrence and the best technique is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of CBA as a repeat procedure in patients with prior CBA or RFCA. Methods: A nation-wide CBA registry (RECABA) was analyzed and patients were compared who had previously undergone CBA (Prior-CB) or RFCA (Prior-RF). The primary endpoint was AF recurrence at 12 months after a 3-month blanking period. A survival analysis was performed, univariate and multivariate Cox models were also built. Results: Seventy-four patients were included. Thirty-three (44.6%) were in the Prior-CB group and 41 (55.4%) in the Prior-RF. There were more reconnected pulmonary veins in the Prior-RF than in Prior-CB group (40.4% vs.16.5%, p = 0.0001). The 12-month Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from AF recurrence after the blanking period was 61.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.4–75.8%) in the Prior-CB, and 89.2% (95% CI 73.6–95.9%) in the Prior-RF group (p = 0.002).  Multivariate Cox regression pointed Prior-CB as the sole independent predictor of AF recurrence, with an adjusted HR of 2.67 (95% CI 1.05–6.79). Conclusions: Repeat CBA shows higher rates of AF recurrences compared to CBA after a previous RFCA despite presenting less reconnected veins at the procedure. These data suggest that patients with AF recurrence after CBA may benefit from other ablation techniques after a recurrence. RECABA is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the Unique Identifier NCT02785991

Variaciones de longitud de ciclo y estabilidad de la fibrilación ventricular bajo diversas condiciones clínico-farmacológicas detectadas a través de un desfibrilador automático implantable

Tesis doctoral inédita leída en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina. Fecha de lectura: 9 de Julio de 200