12 research outputs found

    Neuronal and non-neuronal cells of the avian dorsal root ganglia express mAChRs

    No full text
    The distribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors was investigated by immuno-light and electron microscopy in the chick dorsal root ganglion during embryonic development (E12 and E18) and after hatching. The monoclonal antibody we used recognizes the acetylcholine binding site shared by all five muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. At E12, light microscopy reveals several immunopositive neurons with variable degrees of immunolabeling, heterogeneously distributed throughout the ganglion. Later in development and after hatching, the intensity of immunolabeling seems to decrease and the immunopositive neurons, of the small-medium-sized type, are located mostly in the medio-dorsal region of the ganglion. Under the electron microscope, the immunoreaction is associated with the Nissl bodies, budding Golgi cisterns and, especially at E12, with discrete loci along the neuronal plasma membrane. Unmyelinated nerve fibers, in both central and peripheral branches, are also immunopositive, suggesting that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are transported towards the spinal cord and the periphery, respectively. A large number of perineuronal satellite cells and both myelinating and unmyelinating Schwann cells are intensely labeled. These observations, combined with previous data on the pharmacological and functional characterization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the avian dorsal root ganglion, suggest that both sensory neurons and non-neuronal cells are able to respond to acetylcholine stimuli. Since muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-immunoreactivity is restricted to the small-medium-sized neurons and their unmyelinated fibers, of the nociceptive type, we suggest that these receptors are involved in modulating the transduction of noxious stimuli from the periphery

    Poor reliability of heart rate monitoring to assess oxygen uptake during field training

    Get PDF
    Reactive Rotational Moulding (RRM) is the best process for producing large hollow plastic parts without weld lines. Constant quality in technical parts requires the process to be mastered by controlling on-line the main physical phenomena. However, the main drawback of RRM is poor control of the process due to the high number of influent parameters. In these conditions, the optimization of the process is quite complex. The aim of this work is to simulate the reactive fluid flow during RRM with Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) solver in two dimensions (2D) and three dimensions (3D) taking into account surface tension force. To implement this force, the interface is tracked explicitly using algorithm developed by Barecasco et al. (2013) and Terissa et al. (2013) and the reconstruction of curve or surface boundary by different interpolation or surface construction technique with Lagrangian interpolation and fitting circle methods in 2D and spherical regression in 3D, respectively

    Multicentre Italian study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents, preliminary data as at 10 April 2020

    No full text
    Data on features of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in children and adolescents are scarce. We report preliminary results of an Italian multicentre study comprising 168 laboratory-confirmed paediatric cases (median: 2.3 years, range: 1 day-17.7 years, 55.9% males), of which 67.9% were hospitalised and 19.6% had comorbidities. Fever was the most common symptom, gastrointestinal manifestations were frequent; two children required intensive care, five had seizures, 49 received experimental treatments and all recovered

    Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability

    No full text
    Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p lt .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3–9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276–3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (Δr =.002 or.014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r =.05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r =.04) and the original RP:P replications (r =.11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r =.37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r =.07, range =.00–.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r =.37, range =.19–.50)

    The Double-Edged Flower: Roles of Complement Protein C1q in Neurodegenerative Diseases

    No full text

    Aspects of Nanomaterials in Wound Healing

    No full text

    Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the therapy of renal diseases

    No full text
    corecore