Building a Learning Collaborative

Background: Development and dissemination of evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines are important first steps, but without active translation efforts, they do little to promote knowledge uptake by direct care providers. In order to close the gap between discovery and use of knowledge, efforts should focus on methods to speed translation of research findings into practice. Aim: To facilitate this process, the National Nursing Practice Network (NNPN) was established to provide participating health care organizations with access to resources, information, opportunities for learning and knowledge transfer, and legitimacy and credibility with internal and external stakeholders. Approach: Designed as a practice collaborative learning network, the NNPN uses an interactive learning approach by valuing and learning from the experiences of members and encouraging active participation through conferences, teleconferencing, and use of an interactive member Web site. Use of a network of acute care sites to increase the uptake of EBP is based on social network theory; the NNPN is a network of acute care hospitals through which data, information, knowledge, practices, and behaviors flow. Discussion and Conclusion: The use of a collaborative nursing network provides an innovative way to address the difficulty of implementing and sustaining EBP in organizations and also for maximizing resources and knowledge. Early evaluation data are promising. This approach is offered as one possible method of moving use of EBP in nursing forward.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78682/1/j.1741-6787.2009.00170.x.pd

Emerging Areas of Nursing Science and PhD Education for The 21\u3csup\u3est\u3c/sup\u3e Century: Response to Commentaries

We respond to commentaries from the American Academy of Nursing, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, and the National Institute of Nursing Research on our thoughts about integrating emerging areas of science into nursing PhD programs. We identify areas of agreement and focus our response on cross-cutting issues arising from cautions about the unique focus of nursing science and how best to proceed with incorporation of emerging areas of science into nursing PhD programs

Design and Rationale of the Cognitive Intervention to Improve Memory in Heart Failure Patients Study

BACKGROUND: Memory loss is an independent predictor of mortality among heart failure patients. Twenty-three percent to 50% of heart failure patients have comorbid memory loss, but few interventions are available to treat the memory loss. The aims of this 3-arm randomized controlled trial were to (1) evaluate efficacy of computerized cognitive training intervention using BrainHQ to improve primary outcomes of memory and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and secondary outcomes of working memory, instrumental activities of daily living, and health-related quality of life among heart failure patients; (2) evaluate incremental cost-effectiveness of BrainHQ; and (3) examine depressive symptoms and genomic moderators of BrainHQ effect. METHODS: A sample of 264 heart failure patients within 4 equal-sized blocks (normal/low baseline cognitive function and gender) will be randomly assigned to (1) BrainHQ, (2) active control computer-based crossword puzzles, and (3) usual care control groups. BrainHQ is an 8-week, 40-hour program individualized to each patient's performance. Data collection will be completed at baseline and at 10 weeks and 4 and 8 months. Descriptive statistics, mixed model analyses, and cost-utility analysis using intent-to-treat approach will be computed. CONCLUSIONS: This research will provide new knowledge about the efficacy of BrainHQ to improve memory and increase serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in heart failure. If efficacious, the intervention will provide a new therapeutic approach that is easy to disseminate to treat a serious comorbid condition of heart failure

A call to action for evidence‐based safer conception interventions for HIV‐affected couples desiring children in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135487/1/ijgo73.pd

Parents nurturing literacy through literature experiences

Parents as their children\u27s first teachers play a significant role in nurturing their literacy. Children who come from home environments in which they have frequent and varied experiences with print material and observe adults interacting with print material for their own purpose usually achieve literacy with ease. Parents who present literature experiences through read aloud sessions to their young children not only extend their conceptual development, sense of story, and knowledge of print, but model an appreciation of language. Picture books, specifically nursery rhymes, alphabet books, predictable texts, books with little or no text, and concept books, can nurture children\u27s emerging literacy. These literature experiences can provide children opportunities to predict the author\u27s message and to share their constructs created through viewing, listening, and reading experiences

Methodology Issues in Implementation Science

Background: Putting evidence into practice at the point of care delivery requires an understanding of implementation strategies that work, in what context and how. Objective: To identify methodological issues in implementation science using 4 studies as cases and make recommendations for further methods development. Research Design: Four cases are presented and methodological issues identified. For each issue raised, evidence on the state of the science is described. Results: Issues in implementation science identified include diverse conceptual frameworks, potential weaknesses in pragmatic study designs, and the paucity of standard concepts and measurement. Conclusions: Recommendations to advance methods in implementation include developing a core set of implementation concepts and metrics, generating standards for implementation methods including pragmatic trials, mixed methods designs, complex interventions and measurement, and endorsing reporting standards for implementation studies

Integrating Emerging Areas of Nursing Science into PhD Programs

The Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science aims to “facilitate and recognize life-long nursing science career development” as an important part of its mission. In light of fast-paced advances in science and technology that are inspiring new questions and methods of investigation in the health sciences, the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science convened the Idea Festival for Nursing Science Education and appointed the Idea Festival Advisory Committee to stimulate dialogue about linking PhD education with a renewed vision for preparation of the next generation of nursing scientists. Building on the 2010 American Association of Colleges of Nursing Position Statement “The Research-Focused Doctoral Program in Nursing: Pathways to Excellence,” Idea Festival Advisory Committee members focused on emerging areas of science and technology that impact the ability of research-focused doctoral programs to prepare graduates for competitive and sustained programs of nursing research using scientific advances in emerging areas of science and technology. The purpose of this article is to describe the educational and scientific contexts for the Idea Festival, which will serve as the foundation for recommendations for incorporating emerging areas of science and technology into research-focused doctoral programs in nursing

Emerging Areas of Science: Recommendations for Nursing Science Education from the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science Idea Festival

The Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science aims to “facilitate and recognize life-long nursing science career development” as an important part of its mission. In light of fast-paced advances in science and technology that are inspiring new questions and methods of investigation in the health sciences, the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science convened the Idea Festival for Nursing Science Education and appointed the Idea Festival Advisory Committee (IFAC) to stimulate dialogue about linking PhD education with a renewed vision for preparation of the next generation of nursing scientists. Building on the 2005 National Research Council report Advancing The Nation\u27s Health Needs and the 2010 American Association of Colleges of Nursing Position Statement on the Research-Focused Doctorate Pathways to Excellence, the IFAC specifically addressed the capacity of PhD programs to prepare nursing scientists to conduct cutting-edge research in the following key emerging and priority areas of health sciences research: omics and the microbiome; health behavior, behavior change, and biobehavioral science; patient-reported outcomes; big data, e-science, and informatics; quantitative sciences; translation science; and health economics. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe IFAC activities, (b) summarize 2014 discussions hosted as part of the Idea Festival, and (c) present IFAC recommendations for incorporating these emerging areas of science and technology into research-focused doctoral programs committed to preparing graduates for lifelong, competitive careers in nursing science. The recommendations address clearer articulation of program focus areas; inclusion of foundational knowledge in emerging areas of science in core courses on nursing science and research methods; faculty composition; prerequisite student knowledge and skills; and in-depth, interdisciplinary training in supporting area of science content and methods

The Effect of a Translating Research into Practice (TRIP)‐Cancer Intervention on Cancer Pain Management in Older Adults in Hospice

Background.  Pain is a major concern for individuals with cancer, particularly older adults who make up the largest segment of individuals with cancer and who have some of the most unique pain challenges. One of the priorities of hospice is to provide a pain‐free death, and while outcomes are better in hospice, patients still die with poorly controlled pain. Objective.  This article reports on the results of a Translating Research into Practice intervention designed to promote the adoption of evidence‐based pain practices for older adults with cancer in community‐based hospices. Setting.  This Institutional Human Subjects Review Board‐approved study was a cluster randomized controlled trial implemented in 16 Midwestern hospices. Methods.  Retrospective medical records from newly admitted patients were used to determine the intervention effect. Additionally, survey and focus group data gathered from hospice staff at the completion of the intervention phase were analyzed. Results.  Improvement on the Cancer Pain Practice Index, an overall composite outcome measure of evidence‐based practices for the experimental sites, was not significantly greater than control sites. Decrease in patient pain severity from baseline to post‐intervention in the experimental group was greater; however, the result was not statistically significant ( P  = 0.1032). Conclusions.  Findings indicate a number of factors that may impact implementation of multicomponent interventions, including unique characteristics and culture of the setting, the level of involvement with the change processes, competing priorities and confounding factors, and complexity of the innovation (practice change). Our results suggest that future study is needed on specific factors to target when implementing a community‐based hospice intervention, including determining and measuring intervention fidelity prospectively.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93516/1/j.1526-4637.2012.01405.x.pd

Moving Toward Patient‐Centered Care: Women's Decisions, Perceptions, and Experiences of the Induction of Labor Process

Background Patient preferences and clinician practices are possible causative factors to explain the increase in induction of labor, but scientific studies that demonstrate this link are limited. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence inductions from the perspective of women. Methods A qualitative investigation using grounded theory methodology was conducted. Women were interviewed preinduction and postinduction. Analysis of the interviews was conducted using constant comparison to identify codes, categories, and themes. Through this process the complex intersection between women, their clinician, and the application of evidence‐based care in clinical practice was explored. Results Five major themes from the preinduction interview were identified; safety of baby, women's trust in their clinician, relief of discomfort and/or anxiety, diminish potential or actual risk, and lack of informed decision making. Five major themes were identified from the postinduction interview; lack of informed decision making, induction as part of a checklist, women's trust in their clinician, happy with induction, and opportunities to improve the experience. Conclusions Lack of informed decision making was cited as a barrier to optimal care. This study has important implications for patient‐centered research and clinical care, requiring the inclusion of women and the salient concepts of care that they identify.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107354/1/birt12080.pd