97 research outputs found

    Racial differences in symptom management approaches among persons with radiographic knee osteoarthritis

    Get PDF
    Background The extent to which racial differences exist in use of treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) is debatable. The purpose of this study was to describe the differences between African Americans (AA) and Caucasian Americans (CA) in using treatment approaches to manage symptoms among individuals with radiographic-confirmed knee OA. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted. Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, we identified 508 AA and 2,075 CA with radiographic tibiofemoral OA in at least one knee. Trained interviewers asked questions relating to current OA treatments including seven CAM therapy categories—alternative medical systems, mind-body interventions, manipulation and body-based methods, energy therapies, and three types of biologically based therapies, as well as conventional medications. We categorized participants as: conventional medication only users, CAM only users, users of both and users of neither. Multinomial logistic regression models adjusting for sociodemographics and clinical/functional factors provided estimates of the association between race and treatment use. Results Overall, 16.5% of AA and 24.2% of CA exclusively used CAM to treat OA, 25.0% of AA and 23.8% of CA used CAM in conjunction with conventional medications, and 24.8% of AA and 14.6% of CA exclusively used conventional medications. After control for sociodemographic and clinical factors, AA were less likely than CA to use CAM therapies alone (adjusted odds ratio (OR) of using CAM alone relative to no CAM or conventional treatments: 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.96) or with conventional medications (adjusted OR relative to no CAM or conventional treatments: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.42–0.83). However, no differences in use of conventional medications alone were observed after adjustment of covariates. Conclusion CAM use is common among people with knee OA, but is less likely to be used by AA relative to CA. For effective CAM therapies, targeted outreach to underserved populations including education about benefits of various CAM treatments and providing accessible care may attenuate observed disparities in effective CAM use by race

    CAM use among overweight and obese persons with radiographic knee osteoarthritis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with knee pain and is an independent predictor of incident knee osteoarthritis (OA); increased pain with movement often leads patients to adopt sedentary lifestyles to avoid pain. Detailed descriptions of pain management strategies by body mass index (BMI) level among OA patients are lacking. The objectives were to describe complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and conventional medication use by BMI level and identify correlates of CAM use by BMI level. METHODS: Using Osteoarthritis Initiative baseline data, 2,675 patients with radiographic tibiofemoral OA in at least one knee were identified. Use of CAM therapies and conventional medications was determined by interviewers. Potential correlates included SF-12, CES-D, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score quality of life. Multinomial logistic regression models adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors provided estimates of the association between BMI levels and treatment use; binary logistic regression identified correlates of CAM use. RESULTS: BMI was inversely associated with CAM use (45% users had BMI \u3e/=35 kg/m(2); 54% had BMI /m(2)), but positively associated with conventional medication use (54% users had BMI \u3e/=35 kg/m(2); 35.1% had BMI /m(2)). Those with BMI \u3e/=30 kg/m(2) were less likely to use CAM alone or in combination with conventional medications when compared to patients with BMI /m(2). CONCLUSIONS: CAM use is common among people with knee OA but is inversely associated with BMI. Understanding ways to further symptom management in OA among overweight and obese patients is warranted

    Correlates of hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid injections among patients with radiographically confirmed osteoarthritis

    Get PDF
    Objective: Despite the rapid proliferation of hyaluronate (HA) and corticosteroid (CO) injections and clinical guidelines regarding their use in osteoarthritis (OA), information on the characteristics of people receiving them is scarce. We described use of injections among adults with radiographically confirmed knee OA and identified correlates of injection use. Methods: We used publicly available data from Osteoarthritis Initiative and included participants with ≥ one radiographically confirmed knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade (K-L) \u3e 2) at baseline. We matched 415 participants reporting HA and/or CO during the 6 month before one of the first 7 annual follow-up assessments to 1,841 non-injection users by randomly selecting a study visit to match the distribution observed in the injection users. Multinomial logistic regression models identified correlates of injection use including sociodemographics and clinical/functional factors. Results: Injections were common (16.9% -year 1, 13.7% -year 2, 16.6 % -year 3, 13.5% - year 4, 15.9% -year 5, 13.5 % -year 6 and 9.9% -year 7) with corticosteroid injections most common (68.4%). HA and CO were more commonly reported by those with higher income (e.g. adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) HA \u3e 50kversus3˘c50k versus \u3c 25k: 3.63; (95% CI: 1.20-10.99)) and less common among blacks (aOR HA: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.55). Greater K-L grade (grade 4 versus 2) was associated with increased odds of HA (aOR: 4.79; 95% CI: 2.47-9.30), CO (aOR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.04-2.34), or both (aOR: 4.94; 95% CI: 1.99-12.27). Conclusion: Hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid injections are associated with higher socioeconomic positioning and indicators of greater disease severity

    Physiological effects of oral glucosamine on joint health: Current status and consensus on future research priorities

    Get PDF
    The aim of this paper was to provide an overview of the current knowledge and understanding of the potential beneficial physiological effects of glucosamine (GlcN) on joint health. The objective was to reach a consensus on four critical questions and to provide recommendations for future research priorities. To this end, nine scientists from Europe and the United States were selected according to their expertise in this particular field and were invited to participate in the Hohenheim conference held in August 2011. Each expert was asked to address a question that had previously been posed by the chairman of the conference. Based on a systematic review of the literature and the collection of recent data, the experts documented the effects of GlcN on cartilage ageing, metabolic/kinetic and maintenance of joint health as well as reduction of risk of OA development. After extensive debate and discussion the expert panel addressed each question and a general consensus statement was developed, agreeing on the current state-of-the-art and future areas for basic and clinical studies. This paper summarizes the available evidence for beneficial effects of GlcN on joint health and proposes new insight into the design of future clinical trials aimed at identifying beneficial physiological effect of GlcN on joint tissuesHenrotin is the founder of Artialis SA a spin-off of the University of Liège. His research has been supported by educational grant from Bioiberica, Nestle, Royal Canin, Expanscience, Danone and BioXtract. The other authors have no conflict of interest related to the subject of this paper. A. Mobasheri acknowledges the financial support of The Wellcome Trust, the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs; grant number: Mobasheri. A. 28102007), the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC; grants BBSRC/S/M/2006/ 13141 and BB/G018030/1) and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Y Henrotin, H Weinans and A. Mobasheri are members of the D-BOARD Consortium funded by European Commission Framework 7 Programme (EU FP7) and wish to acknowledge funding from the Commission in relation to project number 305815, (Novel Diagnostics and Biomarkers for Early Identification of Chronic Inflammatory Joint Diseases, HEALTH.2012.2.4.5-2)

    Long-term Effects of Use of Prescription Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents on Symptoms and Disease Progression among Patients with Radiographically Confirmed Osteoarthritis of the Knee

    Get PDF
    Objective: To estimate the extent to which long-term use of prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) relieve symptoms and delay disease progression among patients with radiographically confirmed osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Methods: Using Osteoarthritis Initiative data, we identified participants with confirmed OA at enrollment and evaluated changes in symptoms measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, WOMAC (n=1,846) and joint space width measured using serial x-rays and a customized software tool (n=1,116) over 4 years. Covariates included sociodemographics, OA clinical characteristics, indices of general health status, body mass index, and use of other treatments. We adjusted for baseline and time-varying confounders using marginal structural modeling. Results: Six percent initiated NSAID treatment at year one, with half of the initiators being regular users. After adjusting for time-varying confounders with marginal structural models, we found that compared to participants who never reported use of prescription NSAIDs, those reporting use for 3 years had on average 0.88 point decrease (95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.46 to 2.22) in WOMAC Pain, 0.72 point decrease (95% CI: -0.12 to 1.56) in WOMAC Stiffness, 4.27 points decrease (95% CI: 0.31 to -8.84) in WOMAC Function, and 0.28mm increase (95% CI: -0.06 to 0.62) in joint space width. Conclusions: Long term NSAID use was associated with a priori defined minimally important clinical improvements in stiffness, function and structural degeneration, but not in pain

    Association of subchondral bone texture on magnetic resonance imaging with radiographic knee osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative Bone Ancillary Study.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: To assess whether initial or 12-18-month change in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subchondral bone texture is predictive of radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression over 36 months. METHODS: This was a nested case-control study including 122 knees/122 participants in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) Bone Ancillary Study, who underwent MRI optimised for subchondral bone assessment at either the 30- or 36-month and 48-month OAI visits. Case knees (n = 61) had radiographic OA progression between the 36- and 72-month OAI visits, defined as ≥ 0.7 mm minimum medial tibiofemoral radiographic joint space (minJSW) loss. Control knees (n = 61) without radiographic OA progression were matched (1:1) to cases for age, sex, body mass index and initial medial minJSW. Texture analysis was performed on the medial femoral and tibial subchondral bone. We assessed the association of texture features with radiographic progression by creating a composite texture score using penalised logistic regression and calculating odds ratios. We evaluated the predictive performance of texture features for predicting radiographic progression using c-statistics. RESULTS: Initial (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 2.13 [1.41-3.40]) and 12- 18-month change (3.76 [2.04-7.82]) texture scores were significantly associated with radiographic OA progression. Combinations of texture features were significant predictors of radiographic progression using initial (c-statistic [95% confidence interval] = 0.65 [0.64-0.65], p = 0.003) and 12-18-month change (0.68 [0.68-0.68], p < 0.001) data. CONCLUSIONS: Initial and 12-18-month changes in MRI subchondral bone texture score were significantly associated with radiographic progression at 36 months, with better predictive performance for 12-18-month change in texture. These results suggest that texture analysis may be a useful biomarker of subchondral bone in OA. KEY POINTS: • Subchondral bone MRI texture analysis is a promising knee osteoarthritis imaging biomarker. • In this study, subchondral bone texture was associated with knee osteoarthritis progression. • This demonstrates predictive and concurrent validity of MRI subchondral bone texture analysis. • This method may be useful in clinical trials with interventions targeting bone

    Magnetic Resonance Image Sequence Influences the Relationship between Bone Marrow Lesions Volume and Pain: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

    Get PDF
    Subchondral bone marrow lesions (BMLs) are related to structural and symptomatic osteoarthritis progression. However, it is unclear how sequence selection influences a quantitative BML measurement and its construct validity. We compared quantitative assessment of BMLs on intermediate-weighted fat suppressed (IW FS) turbo spin echo and 3-dimensional dual echo steady state (3D DESS) sequences. We used a customized software to measure 30 knees&apos; (24-and 48-month MR images) BMLs on both sequences. The results showed that the IW FS sequences have much larger BML volumes (median: IW FS = 1840 mm 3 ; DESS = 191 mm 3 ) and BML volume change (between 24 and 48 months) than DESS sequence and demonstrate more BML volume change. The 24-month BML volume on IW FS is correlated with BML volume on DESS ( = 0.83). BML volume change on IW FS is not significantly correlated with change on DESS. The 24-month WOMAC pain is correlated with the 24-month BMLs on IW FS ( = 0.39) but not DESS. The change in WOMAC pain is correlated with BML volume change on IW FS ( = 0.37) but not DESS. Overall, BML quantification on IW FS offers better validity and statistical power than BML quantification on a 3D DESS sequence

    Physiological effects of oral glucosamine on joint health: Current status and consensus on future research priorities

    Get PDF
    The aim of this paper was to provide an overview of the current knowledge and understanding of the potential beneficial physiological effects of glucosamine (GlcN) on joint health. The objective was to reach a consensus on four critical questions and to provide recommendations for future research priorities. To this end, nine scientists from Europe and the United States were selected according to their expertise in this particular field and were invited to participate in the Hohenheim conference held in Aug

    Evaluation of bone marrow lesion volume as a knee osteoarthritis biomarker - longitudinal relationships with pain and structural changes: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

    Full text link
    Abstract Introduction Bone marrow lesion (BML) size may be an important imaging biomarker for osteoarthritis-related clinical trials and reducing BML size may be an important therapeutic goal. However, data on the interrelationships between BML size, pain, and structural progression are inconsistent and rarely examined in the same cohort. Therefore, we evaluated the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of BML volume with knee pain and joint space narrowing (JSN). Methods A BML volume assessment was performed on magnetic resonance images of the knee collected at the 24- and 48-month Osteoarthritis Initiative visits from a convenience sample of 404 participants in the progression cohort. During the same visits, knee pain was assessed with WOMAC pain scores and knee radiographs were acquired and scored for JSN. BML volume was summed to generate a total knee volume and an index tibiofemoral compartment volume (compartment with greater baseline JSN). Primary analyses included multiple linear regressions (outcome = pain, predictor = total knee BML volume) and logistic regressions (outcome = JSN, predictor = index tibiofemoral compartment BML volume). Results This sample was 49% female with a mean age of 63 (9.2 standard deviation (SD)) years, and 71% had radiographic osteoarthritis in the study knee. Larger baseline BMLs were associated with greater baseline knee pain (P = 0.01), the presence of JSN at baseline (odds ratio (OR) = 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.23 to 1.83), and JSN progression (OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.11 to 1.46). Changes in total knee BML volume had a positive association with changes in knee pain severity (P = 0.004) and this association may be driven by knees that were progressing from no or small baseline BMLs to larger BMLs. In contrast, we found no linear positive relationship between BML volume change and JSN progression. Instead, regression of medial tibiofemoral BML volume was associated with JSN progression compared to knees with no or minimal changes in BML volume (OR = 3.36, 95%CI = 1.55 to 7.28). However, follow-up analyses indicated that the association between JSN progression and BML volume change may primarily be influenced by baseline BML volume. Conclusion Large baseline BMLs are associated with greater baseline knee pain, the presence of JSN at baseline, and disease progression. Additionally, BML regression is associated with decreased knee pain but not a reduced risk of concurrent JSN progression
    corecore