7 research outputs found
Political communication spaces in the Chinese context: a case study of the Chinese media’s reporting of Sino-Japanese relations
© 2019 Dr Tianru GuanThis dissertation joins a vibrant conversation in the media and communication scholarship about the media-politics dynamics in contemporary Chinese context. As a part of a more general reconsideration of the current state of China’s public communication, it addresses the questions of how has China’s political communication space been embedded in and evolved with social contexts, and how have diverse media participants interactively engaged in the discussion of foreign affairs of Sino-Japanese relations. This thesis argues that China’s political communication sphere is a ‘vigorous but censored’ space where the globally similar logic of networked connectedness coexists with the influences of the Chinese national contexts, and various media participants subjectively interconnect, interdepend, and inter-contextualize under networked but hierarchical structures. Through contextualizing the research model of the ‘actor, connector and interlocutor’ as well as conducting qualitative and quantitative analysis of media coverage and discussions on Sino-Japanese relations from China’s official media and social networking site, this dissertation suggests that political communication arrangement in the Chinese context as a three-dimension process of information flow in which the Party organ takes the role of monopolistic ‘actors’ through providing original, authoritative news and information, setting key themes for other participants, and delimiting the boundary of communication space; the public serve as inclusive but heterogeneous ‘connectors’ who connect with each other through subjectively engaging in civic discussion and deliberating political viewpoints; and the political, media, cultural and social elites play the role of ‘interlocutors’ through becoming ‘opinion leaders’ which dialogically relates actor to connector dimensions and integrate China’s political communication space by contextualizing, reinterpreting official’s narratives and exerting influence on public opinions. This study rethinks the changing relationships between the party state, various media actors’ representations of political issues, and individuals’ everyday civic discussions and engagements in contemporary China
Facing disinformation: Five methods to counter conspiracy theories amid the Covid-19 pandemic
Among the burgeoning discussions on the argumentative styles of conspiracy theories and the related cognitive processes of their audiences, research thus far is limited in regard to developing methods and strategies that could effectively debunk conspiracy theories and reduce the harmful influences of conspiracist media exposure. The present study critically evaluates the effectiveness of five approaches to reducing conspiratorial belief, through experiments (N=607) conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Our results demonstrate that the content-based methods of counter conspiracy theory can partly mitigate conspiratorial belief. Specifically, the science- and fact-focused corrections were able to effectively mitigate conspiracy beliefs, whereas media literacy and inoculation strategies did not produce significant change. More crucially, our findings illustrate that both audience-focused methods, which involve decoding the myth of conspiracy theory and re-imagining intergroup relationships, were effective in reducing the cognitive acceptance of conspiracy theory. Building on these insights, this study contributes to a systematic examination of different epistemic means to influence (or not) conspiracy beliefs -an urgent task in the face of the infodemic threat apparent both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
Comunicar : revista cientÃfica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación
TÃtulo, resumen y palabras clave en español e inglésResumen basado en el de la publicaciónEntre las crecientes discusiones sobre los estilos argumentativos de las teorÃas de conspiración y los procesos cognitivos relacionados de su público, los estudios son limitados en lo que respecta al desarrollo de métodos y estrategias que podrÃan desacreditar eficazmente las teorÃas de conspiración y reducir las influencias dañinas de la exposición a los medios de comunicación conspirativos. Se evalúa de manera crÃtica la efectividad de cinco enfoques para reducir la creencia en conspiraciones, a través de experimentos (N=607) realizados en Amazon Mechanical Turk.ES
Combatiendo la desinformación: Cinco métodos para contrarrestar las teorÃas de conspiración en la pandemia de Covid-19
Among the burgeoning discussions on the argumentative styles of conspiracy theories and the related cognitive processes of their audiences, research thus far is limited in regard to developing methods and strategies that could effectively debunk conspiracy theories and reduce the harmful influences of conspiracist media exposure. The present study critically evaluates the effectiveness of five approaches to reducing conspiratorial belief, through experiments (N=607) conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Our results demonstrate that the content-based methods of counter conspiracy theory can partly mitigate conspiratorial belief. Specifically, the science- and fact-focused corrections were able to effectively mitigate conspiracy beliefs, whereas media literacy and inoculation strategies did not produce significant change. More crucially, our findings illustrate that both audience-focused methods, which involve decoding the myth of conspiracy theory and re-imagining intergroup relationships, were effective in reducing the cognitive acceptance of conspiracy theory. Building on these insights, this study contributes to a systematic examination of different epistemic means to influence (or not) conspiracy beliefs -an urgent task in the face of the infodemic threat apparent both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.Entre las crecientes discusiones sobre los estilos argumentativos de las teorÃas de conspiración y los procesos cognitivos relacionados de su público, los estudios hasta ahora son limitados en lo que respecta al desarrollo de métodos y estrategias que podrÃan desacreditar eficazmente las teorÃas de conspiración y reducir las influencias dañinas de la exposición a los medios de comunicación conspirativos. El presente estudio evalúa de manera crÃtica la efectividad de cinco enfoques para reducir la creencia en conspiraciones, a través de experimentos (N=607) realizados en Amazon Mechanical Turk. Nuestros resultados demuestran que los métodos basados en el contenido al enfrentar las teorÃas de la conspiración pueden mitigar parcialmente la creencia conspiratoria. EspecÃficamente, las correcciones centradas en la ciencia y los hechos fueron capaces de mitigar eficazmente las creencias en la conspiración, mientras que las estrategias de alfabetización mediática e inoculación no produjeron cambios significativos. Más importante aún, nuestros hallazgos ilustran que ambos métodos centrados en el público, que implican decodificar el mito de la teorÃa de la conspiración y reimaginar las relaciones intergrupales, fueron efectivos para reducir la aceptación cognitiva de la teorÃa de la conspiración. Basado en estos conocimientos, este estudio contribuye a un examen sistemático de distintos medios epistemológicos para influir (o no) en las creencias conspirativas, una tarea urgente frente a la evidente amenaza infodémica, tanto durante como después de la pandemia de COVID-19
Facing disinformation: Five methods to counter conspiracy theories amid the Covid-19 pandemic
Entre las crecientes discusiones sobre los estilos argumentativos de las teorÃas de conspiración y los procesos cognitivos relacionados de su público, los estudios hasta ahora son limitados en lo que respecta al desarrollo de métodos y estrategias que podrÃan desacreditar eficazmente las teorÃas de conspiración y reducir las influencias dañinas de la exposición a los medios de comunicación conspirativos. El presente estudio evalúa de manera crÃtica la efectividad de cinco enfoques para reducir la creencia en conspiraciones, a través de experimentos (N=607) realizados en Amazon Mechanical Turk. Nuestros resultados demuestran que los métodos basados en el contenido al enfrentar las teorÃas de la conspiración pueden mitigar parcialmente la creencia conspiratoria. EspecÃficamente, las correcciones centradas en la ciencia y los hechos fueron capaces de mitigar eficazmente las creencias en la conspiración, mientras que las estrategias de alfabetización mediática e inoculación no produjeron cambios significativos. Más importante aún, nuestros hallazgos ilustran que ambos métodos centrados en el público, que implican decodificar el mito de la teorÃa de la conspiración y reimaginar las relaciones intergrupales, fueron efectivos para reducir la aceptación cognitiva de la teorÃa de la conspiración. Basado en estos conocimientos, este estudio contribuye a un examen sistemático de distintos medios epistemológicos para influir (o no) en las creencias conspirativas, una tarea urgente frente a la evidente amenaza infodémica, tanto durante como después de la pandemia de COVID-19Among the burgeoning discussions on the argumentative styles of conspiracy theories and the related cognitive processes
of their audiences, research thus far is limited in regard to developing methods and strategies that could effectively debunk
conspiracy theories and reduce the harmful influences of conspiracist media exposure. The present study critically evaluates
the effectiveness of five approaches to reducing conspiratorial belief, through experiments (N=607) conducted on Amazon
Mechanical Turk. Our results demonstrate that the content-based methods of counter conspiracy theory can partly mitigate
conspiratorial belief. Specifically, the science- and fact-focused corrections were able to effectively mitigate conspiracy beliefs,
whereas media literacy and inoculation strategies did not produce significant change. More crucially, our findings illustrate
that both audience-focused methods, which involve decoding the myth of conspiracy theory and re-imagining intergroup
relationships, were effective in reducing the cognitive acceptance of conspiracy theory. Building on these insights, this study
contributes to a systematic examination of different epistemic means to influence (or not) conspiracy beliefs -an urgent task
in the face of the infodemic threat apparent both during and after the COVID-19 pandemi