Let's face it: The lateralization of the face perception network as measured with fMRI is not clearly right dominant

The neural face perception network is distributed across both hemispheres. However, the dominant role in humans is virtually unanimously attributed to the right hemisphere. Interestingly, there are, to our knowledge, no imaging studies that systematically describe the distribution of hemispheric lateralization in the core system of face perception across subjects in large cohorts so far. To address this, we determined the hemispheric lateralization of all core system regions (i.e., occipital face area - OFA, fusiform face area - FFA, posterior superior temporal sulcus - pSTS) in 108 healthy subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We were particularly interested in the variability of hemispheric lateralization across subjects and explored how many subjects can be classified as right-dominant based on the fMRI activation pattern. We further assessed lateralization differences between different regions of the core system and analyzed the influence of handedness and sex on the lateralization with a generalized mixed effects regression model. As expected, brain activity was on average stronger in right-hemispheric brain regions than in their left-hemispheric homologues. This asymmetry was, however, only weakly pronounced in comparison to other lateralized brain functions (such as language and spatial attention) and strongly varied between individuals. Only half of the subjects in the present study could be classified as right-hemispheric dominant. Additionally, we did not detect significant lateralization differences between core system regions. Our data did also not support a general leftward shift of hemispheric lateralization in left-handers. Only the interaction of handedness and sex in the FFA revealed that specifically left-handed men were significantly more left-lateralized compared to right-handed males. In essence, our fMRI data did not support a clear right-hemispheric dominance of the face perception network. Our findings thus ultimately question the dogma that the face perception network – as measured with fMRI – can be characterized as “typically right lateralized”

Supplement with alternative LI calculation methods

Lateralization results with (A) voxel count as metric and (B) an alternativ contrast "faces vs. houses

Stage 2: Modeling Face Recognition in the Predictive Coding Framework: A Combined Computational Modeling and Functional Imaging Study

This is the supplementary material to the Stage 2 of the pre-registered study. The preregistration to stage 1 can be found here: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A8VU

Illusory face detection in pure noise images: The role of interindividual variability in fMRI activation patterns.

Illusory face detection tasks can be used to study the neural correlates of top-down influences on face perception. In a typical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study design, subjects are presented with pure noise images, but are told that half of the stimuli contain a face. The illusory face perception network is assessed by comparing blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses to images in which a face has been detected against BOLD activity related to images in which no face has been detected. In the present study, we highlight the existence of strong interindividual differences of BOLD activation patterns associated with illusory face perception. In the core system of face perception, 4 of 9 subjects had highly significant (p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons) activity in the bilateral occipital face area (OFA) and fusiform face area (FFA). In contrast, 5 of 9 subjects did not show any activity in these regions, even at statistical thresholds as liberal as p = 0.05, uncorrected. At the group level, this variability is reflected by non-significant activity in all regions of the core system. We argue that these differences might be related to individual differences in task execution: only some participants really detected faces in the noise images, while the other subjects simply responded in the desired way. This has several implications for future studies on illusory face detection. First, future studies should not only analyze results at the group level, but also for single subjects. Second, subjects should be explicitly queried after the fMRI experiment about whether they really detected faces or not. Third, if possible, not only the overt response of the subject, but also additional parameters that might indicate the perception of a noise stimulus as face should be collected (e.g., behavioral classification images)

Let’s face it: The lateralization of the face perception network as measured with fMRI is not clearly right dominant

Supplementary Data from the publication: Thome, I., García Alanis, J.C., Volk, J., Vogelbacher, C., Steinsträter, O. &amp; Jansen, A. (2022). Let's face it: The lateralization of the face perception network as measured with fMRI is not clearly right dominant, NeuroImage, Volume 263,119587, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.11958