7 research outputs found

    Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept

    Get PDF
    This article argues that the original thrust of the moral economy concept has been understated and attempts to cast it in a new light by bringing class and capital back into the equation. First, it reviews the seminal works of Thompson and Scott, tracing the origins of the term. It deals with the common conflation of moral economy with Polanyi’s notion of embeddedness, differentiating the two concepts and scrutinizing the ways in which these perspectives have been criticized. Second, it dispels dichotomist conceptions separating economic practice from morality, or embedded configurations from disembedded ones. Against binary views of the market as a boundless realm penetrating previously untainted moral spheres, it posits that social reproduction is characterized by an entanglement of values, which can only be fully grasped by delineating the contours and characteristics of capital accumulation. Third, it contends that moral economy is a dynamic concept because it accounts for class-informed frameworks involving traditions, valuations and expectations. Finally, it argues that moral economy can enrich the concept of hegemony because it pays attention to the often-contradictory values that guide and sustain livelihood practices, through which cultural domination is reproduced or altered

    Handshake Nostalgics and Starter-uppers: Restructuring Governance and Citizenship in Southern Europe

    Get PDF
    In the aftermath of the financial crisis, there is a general process of readjustment of socio-political relations, power geometries and hierarchies within fundamental segments of society. This article tackles precisely such transformations by analyzing emerging practices, legitimacies and struggles around citizenship in south European periphery. Ideologies, representations and deriving practices around models of financial support are deeply engrained within particular production structures, embedded themselves within particular historical social relations, moralities and claims. By looking at two very differently -almost opposed- produced regions, the Industrial District of SMEs in Veneto, and the large electricity production site of Kozani, we ethnographically explore the dialectics between the political meanings attached to 'private' and 'public', while inhabiting with our analysis the mutually constitutive relationships between the economic and the political

    Hidden politics of power and governmentality in transitional justice and peacebuilding:The problem of ‘bringing the local back in’

    Get PDF
    This paper examines ‘the local’ in peacebuilding by examining how ‘local’ transitional justice projects can become spaces of power inequalities. The paper argues that focusing on how ‘the local’ contests or interacts with ‘the international’ in peacebuilding and post-conflict contexts obscures contestations and power relations amongst different local actors, and how inequalities and power asymmetries can be entrenched and reproduced through internationally funded local projects. The paper argues that externally funded projects aimed at emancipating ‘locals’ entrench inequalities and create local elites that become complicit in governing the conduct and participation of other less empowered ‘locals’. The paper thus proposes that specific local actors—often those in charge of externally funded peacebuilding projects—should also be conceptualised as governing agents: able to discipline and regulate other local actors’ voices and their agency, and thus (re)construct ideas about what ‘the local’ is, or is not

    Revived nationalism versus European democracy

    No full text

    ONG, classe sociale et culture en Serbie (une anthropologie de l'aide à la démocratie)

    No full text
    Cette thĂšse analyse la "rĂ©volution associative" en Serbie, le boom des ong locales depuis la dissolution de la yougoslavie. Loin des vues normatives qui cĂ©lĂšbrent les ONG comme incarnations dĂ©mocratiques, il faut expliquer ce phĂ©nomĂšne Ă  travers ses liens dialectiques avec l'industrie de l'aide, l'Ă©conomie politique mondiale et les projets nĂ©olibĂ©raux de restructuration Ă©tatique. J'analyse tout d'abord ce que la dĂ©mocratisation fait en pratique, les Ă©pistĂ©mologies du changement social qu'elle produit, la maniĂšre dont elle essentialise l'Histoire et suggĂšre des techniques de soi comme forme d'intervention sociale. J'examine ensuite les politiques culturelles autour du cadre dominant "dĂ©mocrates contre nationalistes" Ă  travers le prisme analytique de classe: en exposant le cosmopolitisme pratique que les ONG de salon dĂ©ploient comme stratĂ©gie de lĂ©gitimation pour se consolider, et en analysant les "nationalstes" Ă  travers des expĂ©riences de dĂ©possessions symboliques et matĂ©rielles, je montre aussi que faire des "projets" dĂ©radicalise la production du savoir et l'action politique, en mĂȘme temps qu'il produit un nouveau prĂ©cariat. Enfin, je discute le conflit assumĂ© entre ONG et Ă©tat via la rĂ©forme de l'Ă©tat providence. Je soutiens que les hiĂ©rarchies de pouvoir se situent plutĂŽt entre une Ă©lite technocratique d'experts, circulant entre ONG-donateurs-Ă©tat et les ONG et institutions publiques qui fournissent des services, stigmatisĂ©es Ă  cause de leur "rĂ©sistance" aux rĂ©formes. L'aide, je conclus, crĂ©e non seulement les conditions de sa propre reproduction institutioneele, mais surtout, contribue Ă  la reproduction sociale de systĂšmes mondiaux inĂ©galement structurĂ©s.This thesis sets out to unpack the associational revolution in Serbia, the boom of local NGOs since the violent Yugoslav dissolution. Far from normative views, celebrating NGOs as democratic incarnations, we have to explain this phenomenon within its dialectical constitution with global systems of political economy, aid, and current neoliberal state restructuring. First, I analyze what democratization actually does, what kind of epistemologies of change it produces, how it collides to local political constellations, how it pathologizes history and suggests technologies of the self as a form of social intervention. Second, I examine the politics of culture behind the dominant framework Democrats vs. Nationalists through the analytical prism of class: by depicting the practical cosmopolitanism that the salon NGOs deploy as a legitimizing strategy for consolidating power; and by analyzing the nationalists through class-based experiences of material and symbolic dispossessions. Third, I look at the art of NGOing; how project-making deradicalizes knowledge and political action; what labor patterns it produces through the formation of a local precariat. Finally, I discuss the overstated NGO-State clash through the welfare reform (outsourcing policy/provision). I argue that power hierarchies are instead to be drawn between a technocratic Ă©lite of experts, circulating among NGOs-donors-state, and nonprofit and public institutions in service provision, stigmatized for their resistance . Aid, I conclude, not only creates the conditions for its own institutional reproduction, but critically partakes to the social reproduction of unequally structured global systems.PARIS-MĂ©diathĂšque MQB (751132304) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept

    No full text
    This article argues that the original thrust of the moral economy concept has been understated and attempts to cast it in a new light by bringing class and capital back into the equation. First, it reviews the seminal works of Thompson and Scott, tracing the origins of the term. It deals with the common conflation of moral economy with Polanyi’s notion of embeddedness, differentiating the two concepts and scrutinizing the ways in which these perspectives have been criticized. Second, it dispels dichotomist conceptions separating economic practice from morality, or embedded configurations from disembedded ones. Against binary views of the market as a boundless realm penetrating previously untainted moral spheres, it posits that social reproduction is characterized by an entanglement of values, which can only be fully grasped by delineating the contours and characteristics of capital accumulation. Third, it contends that moral economy is a dynamic concept because it accounts for class-informed frameworks involving traditions, valuations and expectations. Finally, it argues that moral economy can enrich the concept of hegemony because it pays attention to the often-contradictory values that guide and sustain livelihood practices, through which cultural domination is reproduced or altered
    corecore