The acute effects of aerobic exercise on sleep in patients with unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial

Study Objectives Insomnia increases the risk of negative disease trajectory, relapse, and suicide in patients with depression. We aimed at investigating the effects of a single bout of aerobic exercise, performed after 02:00 pm, on the subsequent night’s sleep in patients with depression. Methods The study was designed as a two-arm parallel-group, randomized, outcome assessor-blinded, controlled, superiority trial. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a primary diagnosis of unipolar depression were included. The intervention was a single 30-minute bout of moderate aerobic exercise. The control group sat and read for 30 minutes. The primary outcome was sleep efficiency measured by polysomnography. Secondary outcomes were other polysomnographic variables, subjective sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, mood states, and adverse events. Results Ninety-two patients were randomized to the exercise (N = 46) or control group (N = 46). There were no clinically relevant differences at baseline. Intent-to-treat analysis ANCOVA of follow-up sleep efficiency, adjusted for baseline levels and minimization factors, did not detect a significant effect of the allocation (β = −0.93, p = 0.59). There was no evidence for significant differences between both groups in any other objective or subjective sleep outcomes, daytime sleepiness, or adverse events. The intervention had an immediate positive effect on mood states, including depressiveness (β = −0.40, p = 0.003). Conclusions This is the first trial to study the effects of a single bout of aerobic exercise on sleep in patients with depression to the best of our knowledge. Aerobic exercise had no effect on sleep efficiency but had a strong beneficial effect on mood and did not increase adverse outcomes. These results add to the growing body of evidence that, contrary to sleep hygiene recommendations, exercise after 02:00 pm is not detrimental for sleep. Clinical Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03673397. Protocol registered on September 17, 2018

The effects of exercise on sleep in unipolar depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Insomnia predicts the onset, course, and reoccurrence of unipolar depression. However, systematic reviews of treatment options for insomnia in unipolar depression are lacking. After screening 7725 records, 17 trials comprising 1645 patients randomized to 13 treatments were included for quantitative synthesis. Network meta-analysis showed that compared to a passive control condition, all exercise interventions except moderate aerobic exercise alone resulted in significantly better sleep outcomes. Compared with treatment as usual, mind-body exercise plus treatment as usual (SMD: −0.46; 95% CI: −0.80, −0.12) and vigorous strength exercise (SMD: −0.61; 95% CI: −1.12, −0.10) were significantly more effective. Pairwise meta-analyses showed that mind-body exercise (SMD: −0.54; 95% CI: −0.85, −0.23) had beneficial effects compared to passive control. The network meta-analysis is statistically very robust with low heterogeneity, incoherence, and indirectness. However, confidence in the findings was moderate to very low, primarily due to within-study bias. This is the first network meta-analysis to assess exercise's efficacy to improve sleep quality in patients with depression. The findings confirm the benefits of exercise as an add-on treatment for depression. This consolidation of the current state of evidence can help clinicians make evidence-based decisions

Study 1: Endorsement rates and cross-sectional associations

Study materials for study with the following publication title: "Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia". (https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0033291721001124

Reasoning biases and delusional ideation in the general population: A longitudinal study

Study materials for study with the following publication title: "Reasoning biases and delusional ideation in the general population: A longitudinal study"

Effectiveness of hospital clowning on pediatric anxiety and pain: Network meta-analysis

Objective: Anxiety and pain during medical procedures may have adverse short and long-term consequences. We summarize the effectiveness of hospital clown interventions, as compared with medication, the presence of a parent, standard care, and other non-pharmacological distraction interventions on anxiety and pain in minors undergoing medical procedures. Method: Randomized trials were identified in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL, and previous reviews. Screening of titles and abstracts and full-texts, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was done by two independent reviewers. We conducted random-effects network and pairwise meta-analyses based on a frequentist framework. Results: Our analyses with 28 studies showed significantly lower anxiety scores in clowning and other distraction interventions as compared with the presence of parents. No differences were observed between clowning, medication, and other distraction interventions. Clowning interventions were superior to standard care in our main analyses, but non-significant in some of the sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, clowning led to significantly lower pain as compared with presence of parents and standard care. No differences were observed between clowning interventions and the other comparators. For both outcomes, large between study heterogeneity was present but no significant inconsistency between designs. Risk of bias was mainly high and accordingly the certainty of evidence is considered moderate to low. Conclusions: We found no significant difference between medication, other non-medical distraction interventions and hospital clown interventions. Hospital clowns and other distraction interventions were more effective in reducing anxiety and pain in children undergoing medical procedures than the presence of parents alone. In order to allow for better insights regarding the comparative effectiveness of clowning interventions future trials should include detailed descriptions about the clowning intervention itself and the comparator. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved

It Was Intuitive, and It Felt Good: A Daily Diary Study on How People Feel When Making Decisions

In daily life, people make plenty of decisions, either intuitively or based on analysis. So far, research has examined when decision-making leads to correct or biased outcomes. In the present study, we adopted a different perspective and explored how decision-making is associated with how people feel. In an observational study, 134 healthy participants retrospectively reported on six evenings which decisions they had made during that day (total N = 3,850 decisions). They were also asked to indicate how they had felt before/after each decision. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that (a) people reported having felt better prior to intuitive as compared to analytical decisions, (b) people reported having felt better after as compared to before the decision, and (c) this increase in positive feeling was more pronounced for intuitive decisions. The latter two associations were robust to statistically controlling for the life domain in which the decisions occurred, the decisions’ importance and ease, and daily mood. The retrospective design and the single-item measure of mood are among the limitations of this study. Altogether, the results are in line with the idea that making everyday life decisions intuitively makes people feel good