still a concern in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients-authors' response

publishersversionpublishe

High-dose chemotherapy for germ cell tumors: do we have a model?

INTRODUCTION: Since the late nineties, the intensification of chemotherapy doses with hematopoietic stem cell rescue held promise for patients with advanced and poor prognosis germ cell tumors (GCTs). High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has, nowadays, a recognized indication in the salvage setting of advanced GCTs and is steadily utilized worldwide. AREAS COVERED: We evaluated the available data with the use of HDCT in these patients. In addition, we provided an original perspective on several issues as experts on behalf of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and IGG, including peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and the use of HDCT in special subpopulations of GCT, with the aim to help clarify critical issues in the absence of available clear-cut information. EXPERT OPINION: Despite HDCT being currently considered a therapeutic option in the salvage setting, critical questions regarding patient selection are still unanswered. Eligibility of patients with a chemoresistant disease, the use of available prognostic factors as well as tumor marker decline in clinical practice are pending issues. Moving forward, these are critical arguments in favor of further clinical research in the field of advanced GCTs

The EBMT activity survey: 1990-2010

A total of 654 centers from 48 countries were contacted for the 2010 survey. In all, 634 centers reported a total of 33\u2009362 hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) with 30\u2009012 patients receiving their first transplant (12\u2009276 allogeneic (41%) and 17\u2009736 autologous (59%)). Main indications were leukemias: 9355 (31%; 93% allogeneic), lymphoid neoplasias specifically Non Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma and plasma cell disorders: 17\u2009362 (58%; 12% allogeneic), solid tumors: 1585 (5%; 6% allogeneic) and non-malignant disorders: 1609 (6%; 88% allogeneic). There were more unrelated donors than HLA-identical sibling donors (53% versus 41%); the proportion of peripheral blood as stem cell source was 99% for autologous and 71% for allogeneic HSCT. Cord blood was primarily used in allogeneic transplants (6% of total) with three autologous cord blood HSCT being reported. The number of transplants has increased by 19% since 2005 (allogeneic 37% and autologous 9%) and continued to increase by about 1100 HSCT per year since 2000. Patterns of increase were distinct and different. The data show the development of transplantation in Europe since 1990, with the number of patients receiving a HSCT increasing from 4200 to over 30\u2009000 annually. The most impressive trend seen is the steady increase of unrelated donor transplantation, in parallel to the availability of unrelated donors through donor registries

No improvement of survival with reduced- versus high-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplants in Ewing tumor patients

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of Ewing tumor (ET) patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) were compared regarding the use of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and high-intensity conditioning (HIC) regimens as well as human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched and HLA-mismatched grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 87 ET patients from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Pediatric Registry for Stem Cell Transplantations, Asia Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation and MetaEICESS registries treated with allo-SCT. Fifty patients received RIC (group A) and 37 patients received HIC (group B). Twenty-four patients received HLA-mismatched grafts and 63 received HLA-matched grafts. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 7.9 months [\ub11.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.44-10.31] for group A and 4.4 months (\ub11.06, 95% CI 2.29-6.43) for group B patients (P = 1.3). Death of complications (DOC) occurred in 4 of 50 (0.08) and death of disease (DOD) in 33 of 50 (0.66) group A and in 16 of 37 (0.43) and 17 of 37 (0.46) group B patients, respectively. DOC incidence was decreased (P < 0.01) and DOD/relapse increased (P < 0.01) in group A compared with group B. HLA mismatch was not generally associated with graft-versus-Ewing tumor effect (GvETE). CONCLUSIONS: There was no improvement of survival with RIC compared with HIC due to increased DOD/relapse incidence after RIC despite less DOC incidence. This implicates general absence of a clinically relevant GvETE with current protocols. PMID: 21245159 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Free full tex