ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hodgkin Lymphoma-Favorable Prognosis Stage I and II

This topic addresses the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. In most cases, combined modality therapy (chemotherapy followed by involved site radiation therapy) constitutes the current standard of care. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. By combining the most recent medical literature and expert opinion, this revised guideline can aid clinicians in the appropriate use of combined modality therapy for favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. Increasing information about the late effects of treatment has led to attempts to decrease toxicity by using less chemotherapy (decreased duration and/or intensity or different agents) and less radiation therapy (reduced volume and/or dose) while maintaining excellent efficacy

Evidence-based Review on the Use of Proton Therapy in Lymphoma From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group (PTCOG) Lymphoma Subcommittee.

n/

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Recurrent Hodgkin Lymphoma

This topic addresses the management of recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma. While autologous stem cell transplantation may be appropriate for select cases of recurrent disease following comprehensive combined-modality therapy, other options exist for patients treated with lower-dose therapy for early-stage disease. Additionally, innovative targeted therapies provide newer salvage options to consider. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. By combining the most recent medical literature and expert opinion, this revised guideline can aid clinicians in the complex decisionmaking associated with the management of recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma

Patterns of Involved-Field Radiation Therapy Protocol Deviations in Pediatric Versus Adolescent and Young Adults With Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report From the Children\u27s Oncology Group AHOD0031

PURPOSE: The presented protocol for pediatric intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma evaluated the use of a dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen (ABVE-PC [doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, prednisone]) with response-based therapy augmentation (addition of DECA [dexamethasone, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine]) or therapy reduction (elimination of radiation). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A central review of the radiation therapy data for quality assurance was performed, and the association between radiation protocol deviation (RPD) and relapse was assessed in the pediatric group (ageyears) and adolescent and young adult (AYA) group (age \u3e /=15-21 years). Involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) planning was reviewed before the start of treatment and at treatment completion. The records were reviewed through the Quality Assurance Review Center\u27s central review to identify RPD, classified according to dose deviation (DD), volume deviation (VD), undertreatment (UT), and overtreatment (OT). DDs and VDs were further classified as major or minor. RESULTS: Of the 1712 patients enrolled, 1155 received IFRT, of whom, 216 (18.7%) had RPDs. The DD and VD patterns were similar between the pediatric and AYA groups. Minor VDs were most common. UT RPDs accounted for 69% in the pediatric group and 75% in the AYA group. Of the 35 patients with relapse and a RPD, 29 had an undertreatment RPD. Among the patients who received IFRT, a significant difference was found in the cumulative incidence rates of relapse between the pediatric and AYA groups (P = .03); however, no significant difference was found between patients with and without RPD (P = .2). CONCLUSIONS: Most RPDs were minor and consisted of UT in the AYA and pediatric populations both. No difference was observed in RPDs between the pediatric and AYA patients. Thus, in a well-defined and standardized protocol, the RPD distributions for AYA patients will be similar to those for pediatric population. However, the increased cumulative incidence of relapse in the AYA patients who had received IFRT compared with the pediatric population requires further exploration, given the potential differences in clinical outcomes in the AYA population

Innovative Approaches to Radiation Treatment for Mycosis Fungoides in the Setting of Collagen Vascular Disease

Patients with connective tissue disorders are clinically challenging for radiation oncologists as these patients may be at increased risk for radiation-related skin toxicity. A clinical dilemma presents itself in a patient with lupus who presents with confluent skin lesions from mycosis fungoides requiring radiotherapy. In this report, we discuss an innovative technique used to develop an immobilization device that also effectively functioned as a uniform bolus with distinct dosimetric advantages to the use of a facial moulage

Radiation Therapy and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells: Breaking Down Their Cancerous Partnership.

Radiation therapy (RT) has been a primary treatment modality in cancer for decades. Increasing evidence suggests that RT can induce an immunosuppressive shift via upregulation of cells such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). MDSCs inhibit antitumor immunity through potent immunosuppressive mechanisms and have the potential to be crucial tools for cancer prognosis and treatment. MDSCs interact with many different pathways, desensitizing tumor tissue and interacting with tumor cells to promote therapeutic resistance. Vascular damage induced by RT triggers an inflammatory signaling cascade and potentiates hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment (TME). RT can also drastically modify cytokine and chemokine signaling in the TME to promote the accumulation of MDSCs. RT activation of the cGAS-STING cytosolic DNA sensing pathway recruits MDSCs through a CCR2-mediated mechanism, inhibiting the production of type 1 interferons and hampering antitumor activity and immune surveillance in the TME. The upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor mobilizes MDSCs to the TME. After recruitment, MDSCs promote immunosuppression by releasing reactive oxygen species and upregulating nitric oxide production through inducible nitric oxide synthase expression to inhibit cytotoxic activity. Overexpression of arginase-1 on subsets of MDSCs degrades L-arginine and downregulates CD3ζ, inhibiting T-cell receptor reactivity. This review explains how radiation promotes tumor resistance through activation of immunosuppressive MDSCs in the TME and discusses current research targeting MDSCs, which could serve as a promising clinical treatment strategy in the future

Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED10), LC, and toxicity incidence. RESULTS: Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED10 was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy10 increase in BED10 associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics