Ethologic and Economic Examination of Aviary Housing for Commercial Laying Flocks

The result of our work shows that appropriate housing is necessary for intensively kept hens and that the housing has to correspond to the vital needs and the nature of the animals. This is important for two reasons: a) the innate needs of the birds must be satisfied; b) for the proper development of the animal and successful egg production. The housing facilities should allow the following functional cycles without restrictions: Social organization: the structuring of a group or unit of animals. Locomotion: walking, running, fluttering, flying. Feeding behavior: search for food and water, food and water pecking, ground scratching, scraping. Comfort behavior: plumage care, stretching, dust bathing. Resting behavior: standing, sleeping. Sexual behavior: egg laying, nest building behavior. Each one of these functional cycles requires its own area in the hen house. The hen house has to be arranged in order to accommodate the needs of the animals

Le rôle des institutions nationales et internationales pour contrer le trafic illicite des biens culturels

Since the civil war in 1979 Afghanistan’s heritage has been exposed to severe robbery. To mitigate the plunder several measures need to be taken. Looting is a mutual problem: market countries should prevent the sale and source countries should protect artefacts. Within Afghanistan international military forces could assist train the Afghan Heritage Police and civil society should include cultural heritage in their development plans

Ethologic and Economic Examination of Aviary Housing for Commercial Laying Flocks

The result of our work shows that appropriate housing is necessary for intensively kept hens and that the housing has to correspond to the vital needs and the nature of the animals. This is important for two reasons: a) the innate needs of the birds must be satisfied; b) for the proper development of the animal and successful egg production. The housing facilities should allow the following functional cycles without restrictions: Social organization: the structuring of a group or unit of animals. Locomotion: walking, running, fluttering, flying. Feeding behavior: search for food and water, food and water pecking, ground scratching, scraping. Comfort behavior: plumage care, stretching, dust bathing. Resting behavior: standing, sleeping. Sexual behavior: egg laying, nest building behavior. Each one of these functional cycles requires its own area in the hen house. The hen house has to be arranged in order to accommodate the needs of the animals

The "war on terror" and the military-archaeology complex: Iraq, ethics, and neo-colonialism

The archaeological response to the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq is often portrayed as a crusade to rescue antiquities, destroyed either directly by the military action itself or indirectly by the looting of archaeological sites and museums. I argue in this paper that this narrative is awfully inadequate, and masks the ethical and political dimensions at the core of this historical episode. I contend that, in their often well-intended attempts to rescue antiquities, most archaeologists involved have projected a professionalized, apolitical and abstract response, devoid of the social and political context, and based on the fetishisation of a narrowly and problematically defined archaeological record. I argue further that the increasing collaboration of many archaeologists with the invading militaries and occupation authorities since 2003, assisted by the “cultural turn” especially within the US military, have laid the foundations for an emerging military-archaeology complex. I trace the contours of this phenomenon by examining various archaeological and museum discourses and practices. This new development (with historical resonances that go as far back as the 18th century, if not earlier) is linked directly with the ontology and epistemology of archaeology, and deserves further close scrutiny and analysis. The thesis advanced here does not advocate inaction and withdrawal in situations of warfare, but a critical engagement that safeguards the autonomy of the scholar; critiques the political agendas and power structures of contemporary warfare; deconstructs its discursive basis and its ideological overtones; and shows its catastrophic consequences for people and things alike, past and present. <br/