22 research outputs found
Mesoderm is required for coordinated cell movements within zebrafish neural plate in vivo.
BACKGROUND: Morphogenesis of the zebrafish neural tube requires the coordinated movement of many cells in both time and space. A good example of this is the movement of the cells in the zebrafish neural plate as they converge towards the dorsal midline before internalizing to form a neural keel. How these cells are regulated to ensure that they move together as a coherent tissue is unknown. Previous work in other systems has suggested that the underlying mesoderm may play a role in this process but this has not been shown directly in vivo. RESULTS: Here we analyze the roles of subjacent mesoderm in the coordination of neural cell movements during convergence of the zebrafish neural plate and neural keel formation. Live imaging demonstrates that the normal highly coordinated movements of neural plate cells are lost in the absence of underlying mesoderm and the movements of internalization and neural tube formation are severely disrupted. Despite this, neuroepithelial polarity develops in the abnormal neural primordium but the resulting tissue architecture is very disorganized. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the movements of cells in the zebrafish neural plate are highly coordinated during the convergence and internalization movements of neurulation. Our results demonstrate that the underlying mesoderm is required for these coordinated cell movements in the zebrafish neural plate in vivo
Zebrafish as an emerging model to study estrogen receptors in neural development
Estrogens induce several regulatory signals in the nervous system that are mainly mediated through estrogen receptors (ERs). ERs are largely expressed in the nervous system, yet the importance of ERs to neural development has only been elucidated over the last decades. Accumulating evidence shows a fundamental role for estrogens in the development of the central and peripheral nervous systems, hence, the contribution of ERs to neural function is now a growing area of research. The conservation of the structure of the ERs and their response to estrogens make the zebrafish an interesting model to dissect the role of estrogens in the nervous system. In this review, we highlight major findings of ER signaling in embryonic zebrafish neural development and compare the similarities and differences to research in rodents. We also discuss how the recent generation of zebrafish ER mutants, coupled with the availability of several transgenic reporter lines, its amenability to pharmacological studies and in vivo live imaging, could help us explore ER function in embryonic neural development
Ătude d'un gĂšne hsp40 au cours de la rĂ©gĂ©nĂ©ration de la nageoire caudale et du dĂ©veloppement embryonnaire chez le poisson zĂšbre (Danio rerio)
PARIS7-BibliothĂšque centrale (751132105) / SudocSudocFranceF
La rĂ©gĂ©nĂ©ration des appendices chez les vertĂ©brĂ©s: un modĂšle expĂ©rimental ancien pour Ă©tudier les cellules souches chez lâadulte
La recherche sur les cellules souches laisse entrevoir dâextraordinaires possibilitĂ©s de traitement des maladies dĂ©gĂ©nĂ©ratives. En effet, la capacitĂ© de pouvoir dĂ©river des cellules totipotentes Ă partir dâembryons humains donne la possibilitĂ© de dĂ©velopper une mĂ©decine rĂ©gĂ©nĂ©rative, mais pose Ă©galement le problĂšme du statut de lâembryon qui, dans ce cas, est considĂ©rĂ© comme matĂ©riel thĂ©rapeutique. Une alternative Ă lâutilisation des cellules souches embryonnaires humaines est lâutilisation de cellules souches prĂ©levĂ©es chez lâadulte. Mais, dans un cas comme dans lâautre, nos connaissances sur les cellules totipotentes ou pluripotentes sont insuffisantes et de nombreuses questions doivent ĂȘtre rĂ©solues avant que lâon ne maĂźtrise la sĂ©lection et la diffĂ©renciation de ces cellules dans un type cellulaire donnĂ©. Quelles sont les caractĂ©ristiques molĂ©culaires dâune cellule souche adulte? Quels sont les mĂ©canismes sous-jacents Ă la re-programmation dâune cellule? Quels sont les signaux qui contrĂŽlent la multiplication et la diffĂ©renciation des cellules souches? Un travail de recherche fondamentale est nĂ©cessaire pour Ă©claircir ces diffĂ©rents points. Dans ce contexte, la rĂ©gĂ©nĂ©ration des appendices chez les vertĂ©brĂ©s offre un terrain dâinvestigation intĂ©ressant. Cet article se propose de faire le point sur nos connaissances concernant la rĂ©gĂ©nĂ©ration des pattes chez les tĂ©trapodes et des nageoires chez les poissons.The application of stem cell therapy to cure degenerative diseases offers immense possibilities, but the research in this field is the subject of ethical debates raised by the question of destructive research on early human embryos. Stem cells taken in the adult constitute an alternative to human embryonic stem cells, but our knowledge on totipotent or pluripotent cells is currently insufficient. Furthermore, many questions must be solved before selection and differentiation of these cells in a given cellular type can be controlled on a routine basis. What are the molecular characteristics of an adult stem cell? What are the mechanisms involved in cell reprogramming? Which signals control stem cell replication and differentiation? Basic research activities must be carried out in order to clarify all these points. In this context, the regeneration of vertebrate appendages provides a model for this type of research. The regeneration process is defined by both the morphological and functional reconstruction of a part of a living organism, which has previously been destroyed. But why are some vertebrates able to regenerate complex structures and others apparently not? Among most vertebrates, the capacity to regenerate is limited to some tissues. It is however possible to observe the regeneration of appendages (limb, tail, fin, jaw, etc.) among several amphibians and fish. This regeneration leads to re-forming of the amputated part with a complete restoration of its shape, segmentation and function. Why is the amputation of limbs not followed by regeneration in mammals and birds: absence of stem cells, absence of recruitment signals for these cells, or absence of signal receptivity? This review constitutes a report on the current understanding of the basis of on regeneration of legs in tetrapods and of fins in fish with an emphasis in the role of the nervous system in this process
Rho GTPases Signaling in Zebrafish Development and Disease
Cells encounter countless external cues and the specificity of their responses is translated through a myriad of tightly regulated intracellular signals. For this, Rho GTPases play a central role and transduce signals that contribute to fundamental cell dynamic and survival events. Here, we review our knowledge on how zebrafish helped us understand the role of some of these proteins in a multitude of in vivo cellular behaviors. Zebrafish studies offer a unique opportunity to explore the role and more specifically the spatial and temporal dynamic of Rho GTPases activities within a complex environment at a level of details unachievable in any other vertebrate organism
Neuronal Ndrg4 Is Essential for Nodes of Ranvier Organization in Zebrafish
International audienceAxon ensheathment by specialized glial cells is an important process for fast propagation of action potentials. The rapid electrical conduction along myelinated axons is mainly due to its saltatory nature characterized by the accumulation of ion channels at the nodes of Ranvier. However, how these ion channels are transported and anchored along axons is not fully understood. We have identified N-myc downstream-regulated gene 4, ndrg4, as a novel factor that regulates sodium channel clustering in zebrafish. Analysis of chimeric larvae indicates that ndrg4 functions autonomously within neurons for sodium channel clustering at the nodes. Molecular analysis of ndrg4 mutants shows that expression of snap25 and nsf are sharply decreased, revealing a role of ndrg4 in controlling vesicle exocytosis. This uncovers a previously unknown function of ndrg4 in regulating vesicle docking and nodes of Ranvier organization, at least through its ability to finely tune the expression of the t-SNARE/NSF machinery
A decrease in Fkbp52 alters autophagosome maturation and A152T-tau clearance in vivo
The failure of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway to clear the pathogenic forms of Tau exacerbates the pathogenesis of tauopathies. We have previously shown that the immunophilin FKBP52 interacts both physically and functionally with Tau, and that a decrease in FKBP52 protein levels is associated with Tau deposition in affected human brains. We have also shown that FKBP52 is physiologically present within the lysosomal system in healthy human neurons and that a decrease in FKBP52 expression alters perinuclear lysosomal positioning and Tau clearance during Tau-induced proteotoxic stress in vitro. In this study, we generate a zebrafish fkbp4 loss of function mutant and show that axonal retrograde trafficking of Lamp1 vesicles is altered in this mutant. Moreover, using our transgenic HuC::mCherry-EGFP-LC3 line, we demonstrate that the autophagic flux is impaired in fkbp4 mutant embryos, suggesting a role for Fkbp52 in the maturation of autophagic vesicles. Alterations in both axonal transport and autophagic flux are more evident in heterozygous rather than homozygous fkbp4 mutants. Finally, taking advantage of the previously described A152T-Tau transgenic fish, we show that the clearance of pathogenic A152T-Tau mutant proteins is slower in fkbp4+/â mutants in comparison to fkbp4+/+ larvae. Altogether, these results indicate that Fkbp52 is required for the normal trafficking and maturation of lysosomes and autophagic vacuoles along axons, and that its decrease is sufficient to hinder the clearance of pathogenic Tau in vivo
Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is an essential and direct driver of myelin gene expression and myelinogenesis.
International audienceWnt/beta-catenin signaling plays a major role in the development of the nervous system and contributes to neuronal plasticity. However, its role in myelination remains unclear. Here, we identify the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway as an essential driver of myelin gene expression. The selective inhibition of Wnt components by small interfering RNA or dominant-negative forms blocks the expression of myelin protein zero (MPZ) and peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) in mouse Schwann cells and proteolipid protein in mouse oligodendrocytes. Moreover, the activation of Wnt signaling by recombinant Wnt1 ligand increases by threefold the transcription of myelin genes and enhances the binding of beta-catenin to T-cell factor/lymphoid-enhancer factor transcription factors present in the vicinity of the MPZ and PMP22 promoters. Most important, loss-of-function analyses in zebrafish embryos show, in vivo, a key role for Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the expression of myelin genes and in myelin sheath compaction, both in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Inhibition of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling resulted in hypomyelination, without affecting Schwann cell and oligodendrocyte generation or axonal integrity. The present findings attribute to Wnt/beta-catenin pathway components an essential role in myelin gene expression and myelinogenesis
ndrg4 is not required for axonal outgrowth or early Schwann cell development.
<p>Acetylated tubulin expression in control (A), ndrg4 mutant (C) and morphant (B) embryos at 4 dpf showing the PLLn nerve. Scale bar = 45ÎŒm. (d-F) Whole mount <i>in situ</i> hybridization of a (d) control embryo, ndrg4 mutant (F) and ndrg4 morphant (E) showing <i>sox10</i> expression in PLLn SCs (arrows) at 3 dpf. Scale bar = 200ÎŒm. Lateral view of a control foxd3::GFP embryo (G), a ndrg4 morphant (H) at 3 dpf showing SCs (arrows) along the PLLn. Transmission electron micrographs showing cross-section through (I) control and ndrg4 mutant (J). Control PLLn shows an average of 10.7 myelinated axons (blue asterisks). (J) An average of 5.36 myelinated axons (blue asterisks) is observed in the ndrg4 mutantâs PLLn. (S: Schwann cell). Scale bars = 0.5ÎŒm. (K,L) Quantification of the total number of axons and the number myelinated axons in controls, ndrg4 mutants and ndrg4 morphants. NS: Non Significant.</p