Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: A comparison with patients without prior treatment

n/

Routine Shunting during Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Acute Watershed Stroke

Aim: To evaluate the protective role of routine shunting in patients with acute watershed stroke (WS) undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: A total of 138 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS) who underwent CEA after acute ischemic stroke from March 2008 to March 2015 were included in this study. Transient ischemic attacks were excluded. These patients were divided into 2 groups according to the topographic pattern of the stroke on magnetic resonance imaging: group 1, territorial strokes (TS) caused by emboli of carotid origin, and group 2, WS caused by a hemodynamic mechanism related to an SCS. Primary end points were 30-day mortality and postoperative neurological morbidity. The insertion of a Pruitt carotid shunt was performed systematically. Results: Ninety (65.2%) patients presented a TS of carotid origin and were included in group 1, and 48 (34.8%) of the 138 patients had a WS related to an SCS and were included in group 2. The median time between clinical onset of the cerebral ischemic event and surgery was 9 days (range: 0-89 days). Postoperative mortality was 0%. Seven (5.1%) patients had an aggravation of the neurological status during the postoperative period, of whom 2 presented a complete regression of the symptoms in less than 1 hour (definitive postoperative neurologic morbidity: 3.6%). Postoperative neurologic morbidity rate was significantly higher in the TS group (7 of 90; 7.8%) compared to the WS group (0 of 48; P =.04). No other independent predictive factor of neurologic morbidity after CEA for an SCS was found. Conclusions: Our results suggest that routine shunting should be considered in case of acute WS since it may play a protective role. Further studies are eagerly awaited to better define the timing and the best treatment option for both acute WS and TS related to an SCS in order to reduce postoperative neurologic morbidity

Use of a Thoracic Endograft in an Acute Abdominal Aortic Setting: Case Report and Literature Review

Purpose: We report the case of a thoracic endograft used to achieve exclusion of a ruptured proximal paranastomotic abdominal aortic aneurysm (PAAA) as a consequence of aortic ballooning. Case Report: A type I proximal endoleak was evidenced following endovascular repair of a PAAA with an aortic cuff. The leak was treated with ballooning, which caused distal aortic rupture. A thoracic endograft was deployed inside the cuff, achieving complete exclusion. At 1 year, there are no signs of migration or endoleak with complete PAAA thrombosis, according to computed tomographic angiography. Conclusion: In hostile proximal abdominal aortic neck, challenging anatomies, or urgent cases, the structural adaptability of thoracic endografts could provide safe and successful abdominal aortic endovascular exclusion

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with the Powerlink Endograft System: Influence of placement on the bifurcation and use of a proximal extension on early and late outcomes

ObjectiveWe evaluated the influence of placement of the bifurcated Powerlink endograft (Endologix Inc, Irvine, Calif) on the aortic bifurcation, with the addition of a proximal extension, in the endovascular treatment (EVAR) of selected patients with atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).MethodsFrom September 1999 to June 2007, 205 patients were treated with the bifurcated Powerlink endograft for atherosclerotic AAA at two Italian centers with shared protocols. Patients were retrospectively divided in two groups according to treatment with the bifurcated graft only (n = 126), or its placement on the bifurcation with the addition of a proximal extension (n = 79) at the initial procedure. Study end points included postoperative complications, secondary procedures, immediate and late conversion, migration, endoleak, death, and aneurysmal sac behavior.ResultsOverall technical success was 98.5%. Additional procedures were performed in 18%, and postoperative complications occurred in 11.2% (systemic, 8.3%; local, 2.9%). Median follow-up was 42.4 months (range, 6-94 months). Secondary procedures were recorded in 11.2%, migration in 3.9%, type I proximal endoleak in 7.8%, and late conversions in 2.4%. Placement on the bifurcation and the addition of an extension were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications (7.1% vs 17.7%, P = .020). A reduced incidence of endoleak (19% vs 8.9%, P = .048), secondary procedures (14.3% vs 6.3%, P = .04), and migration (6.3% vs 0%, P = .024) were observed in the group with a proximal extension. Analysis of single variables reveals that migration was significantly influenced by placement of the graft on the bifurcation (47% vs 0%, P < .001). Both placement on the bifurcation and the addition of an extension positively influenced the type I proximal endoleak rate (3.8% vs 35.3% P < .001) and the need for a secondary intervention (6.3% vs 35.3% P < .001) Two aneurysm ruptures and five cases of late conversion occurred in the group treated with a bifurcated graft only (4%, P = .52, P = .159). Analysis of aneurysm sac behavior was not statistically significant: enlargement, 4.1% vs 1.3% (P = .158); reduction, 34.1% vs 40.5% (P = .542).ConclusionThe placement of the bifurcated Powerlink endograft on the aortic bifurcation with a proximal extension for complete sealing seems to improve late outcomes, particularly secondary procedures, migration, and endoleak development. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these promising results

Use of combined thoracic and abdominal endografts for proximal severe neck angulation in abdominal aortic aneurysms

To evaluate endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with severe neck angulation (SNA) utilizing a thoracic endograft placed proximal to a bifurcated endograft

Using the Angio-Seal to Achieve Hemostasis in Prosthetic Endovascular Surgery: Report of Three Cases

At least 10% of patients who undergo bilateral aortofemoral bypass are at risk of needing a reoperation for late prosthetic thrombosis because of reduced outflow as the disease progresses. To prevent occlusion of the prostheses, we performed endovascular surgery with transprosthetic access for distal stenosis. We report our experience of using the Angio-Seal with transprosthetic access after angioplasty in three patients who had undergone bilateral aortofemoral bypass. Hemostasis was achieved in all three patients. There were no complications, such as hemorrhage, hematoma, or prosthetic infection, and all three patients were discharged within 24 h. At the 12-, 15-, and 24-month follow-up, none of the patients had any sign of recurrent claudication. Using the Angio-Seal in bilateral aortofemoral bypass provided the means of treating distal stenosis by endovascular surgery with transprosthetic access. This method is both rapid and safe, and may broaden the indications for the endovascular treatment of distal arteriopathies in patients with vascular prostheses