Safety of Adding Oats to a Gluten-free Diet for Patients with Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Observational Studies

Background & Aims: Patients with celiac disease should maintain a gluten-free diet (GFD), excluding wheat, rye, and barley. Oats might increase the nutritional value of a GFD, but their inclusion is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of oats as part of a GFD in patients with celiac disease. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for clinical trials and observational studies of the effects of including oats in GFD of patients with celiac disease. The studies reported patients’ symptoms, results from serology tests, and findings from histologic analyses. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence. Results: We identified 433 studies; 28 were eligible for analysis. Of these, 6 were randomized and 2 were not randomized controlled trials comprising a total of 661 patients—the remaining studies were observational. All randomized controlled trials used pure/uncontaminated oats. Oat consumption for 12 months did not affect symptoms (standardized mean difference: reduction in symptom scores in patients who did and did not consume oats, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.56 to 0.13; P = .22), histologic scores (relative risk for histologic findings in patients who consumed oats, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.01–4.8; P = .35), intraepithelial lymphocyte counts (standardized mean difference, 0.21; 95% CI, reduction of 1.44 to increase in 1.86), or results from serologic tests. Subgroup analyses of adults vs children did not reveal differences. The overall quality of evidence was low. Conclusions: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no evidence that addition of oats to a GFD affects symptoms, histology, immunity, or serologic features of patients with celiac disease. However, there were few studies for many endpoints, as well as limited geographic distribution and low quality of evidence. Rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials, using commonly available oats sourced from different regions, are needed

Unusually High Incidence of Paediatric Coeliac Disease in Sweden during the Period 1973 - 2013.

The prevalence of coeliac disease in Sweden during the "epidemic period" (1984-1996) was one of the highest in the world. The aim of this study was to assess the coeliac disease incidence in our region over the 41-year period, and how diagnostic activity and diagnostic accuracy were affected by the introduction of antibody testing. We also looked into how patients with mild enteropathy were evaluated.In the county of Östergötland in Sweden, 2790 paediatric patients were investigated for suspected coeliac disease between 1973 and 2013. Notes were scrutinised for data on sex, age, histopathological reports and final diagnosis. For comparative purposes this period was divided into three sub-periods (1973-1983, 1984-1996 and 1997-2013) named pre-epidemic, epidemic and post-epidemic.Coeliac disease diagnosis was received by 1,030 patients. The peak incidence rate, 301 cases/100,000 in 1994 for the age group 0-1.9 years is the highest figure ever reported. The other age groups, 2-4.9, 5-14.9, and 15-17.9 years, also had high incidence rates. After the 1984-1996 "epidemic period" the incidence decreased for the youngest group but continued to increase for the other groups. The cumulative incidence at 18 years-of-age for children born during the epidemic reached 14 cases/1000 births, the highest figure hitherto reported. Diagnostic activity differed significantly between the three sub-periods (p<0.001) increasing gradually from 1984 and reaching a peak value of 0.87 in 2012. Cases of mild enteropathy were more frequently regarded as non-coeliac disease cases, decreasing significantly in the "post-epidemic" period (p<0.001).The incidence rate and cumulative incidence of coeliac disease were possibly the highest ever reported. Changes in diagnostic activity and accuracy could not be attributed to the introduction of new antibody tests, possibly because of other changes e.g. variations in the symptoms at presentation and improved knowledge of the disease among parents and health professionals

Ethical considerations within the ESPGHAN community

There are limited data on ethical issues related to the daily practice of members of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). The role of the ESPGHAN Ethics Committee is to provide advice on such matters to its members. The present survey aimed to evaluate the current function, and reasons that ESPGHAN members consulted the Ethics Committees. 105 participants from 24 different countries answered the questionnaire. 35,7% of the participants used the ESGHAN Ethics Committee to ask about clinical practice problems and patients-related issues whereas 21,4% asking about human research questions. An important additional finding was that 66,3% of respondents consulted their Hospital's Ethics Committee when they had ethical concerns and 17,4% consulted with other colleagues with expertise. This is the first survey in the ESPGHAN and Europe that analyses ethical issues that are important to members of the National Societies for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition

Understanding and Responding to the Impact of COVID-19 on Paediatric Gastroenterology Training &amp; Practice of Young ESPGHAN Members

Objectives: Limited data exist about the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the training and clinical practice of young doctors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on paediatric gastroenterologists in training posts during the first wave of the European COVID pandemic. Methods: All Young members of European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) (YE) members received a multiple-choice questionnaire concerning the impact (if any) on their clinical practice, mental health, quality of care provided and fellowship/training experience. The survey was conducted between May 22, 2020 and June 10, 2020. Results: Of the 144 responders (40% of YE members), 85% (n = 123) reported an impact of COVID-19. Ninety-six percent reported an impact on their clinical practice, including more virtual patient consultation (n = 91), underutilization of ambulatory care (n = 113) and reduced or lack of planned admissions (n = 75). Endoscopy restrictions to semi-urgent or emergency cases were reported in 82 and lack of medical equipment/drugs (n = 47) were also reported.Reported adverse mental health issues included poor concentration, increased stress levels, an impact on family life in 62% and a reduced quality of care in 45%; this was more often reported in doctors from Southern Europe (54%) than in those from other geographical areas.Seventy-seven percent reported an impact on the content of their fellowship, including lack of participation in national/international meetings, withdrawn research time and limited mentoring. Conclusions: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has been shown to affect the clinical practice, training and mental health of YE members. Adaptations of training programmes and targeted strategies to improve the clinical practice of young practitioners are needed and proposed in this manuscript.</p

Diagnostic activity and accuracy among Swedish children investigated for CD with biopsy between 1973 and 2013.

<p>Arrows indicate when AGA, EMA, t-TGA tests were used in >50% of the cases investigated for CD, and also the introduction of the 2012 ESPGHAN guidelines for CD diagnosis into clinical practice. Diagnostic activity was considered as the number of subjects biopsied per 1,000 children in the study population. Diagnostic accuracy was specified as the number of CD cases per total number of children with suspected CD who underwent biopsy. The diagnostic activity and accuracy are described as ratios. The purple line represents the incidence rate of CD in the pediatric population during the same time period.</p

Cumulative incidence of CD by age for the birth cohorts 1973−1983, 1984−1996, and 1997−2013.

<p>Cumulative incidence of CD by age for the birth cohorts 1973−1983, 1984−1996, and 1997−2013.</p

Flowchart of investigation.

<p>Flowchart of investigation.</p

Annual incidence rate of CD in different age groups from 1973 to 2013.

<p>Annual incidence rate of CD in different age groups from 1973 to 2013.</p