The YEATS domain of Taf14 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a negative impact on cell growth

The role of a highly conserved YEATS protein motif is explored in the context of the Taf14 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In S. cerevisiae, Taf14 is a protein physically associated with many critical multisubunit complexes including the general transcription factors TFIID and TFIIF, the chromatin remodeling complexes SWI/SNF, Ino80 and RSC, Mediator and the histone modification enzyme NuA3. Taf14 is a member of the YEATS superfamily, conserved from bacteria to eukaryotes and thought to have a transcription stimulatory activity. However, besides its ubiquitous presence and its links with transcription, little is known about Taf14’s role in the nucleus. We use structure–function and mutational analysis to study the function of Taf14 and its well conserved N-terminal YEATS domain. We show here that the YEATS domain is not necessary for Taf14’s association with these transcription and chromatin remodeling complexes, and that its presence in these complexes is dependent only on its C-terminal domain. Our results also indicate that Taf14’s YEATS domain is not necessary for complementing the synthetic lethality between TAF14 and the general transcription factor TFIIS (encoded by DST1). Furthermore, we present evidence that the YEATS domain of Taf14 has a negative impact on cell growth: its absence enables cells to grow better than wild-type cells under stress conditions, like the microtubule destabilizing drug benomyl. Moreover, cells expressing solely the YEATS domain grow worser than cells expressing any other Taf14 construct tested, including the deletion mutant. Thus, this highly conserved domain should be considered part of a negative regulatory loop in cell growth

BVES regulates c-Myc stability via PP2A and suppresses 1 colitis-induced 2 tumorigenesis

Objective Blood vessel epicardial substance (BVES) is a tight junction-associated protein that regulates epithelial-mesenchymal states and is underexpressed in epithelial malignancy. However, the functional impact of BVES loss on tumourigenesis is unknown. Here we define the in vivo role of BVES in colitis-associated cancer (CAC), its cellular function and its relevance to patients with IBD. Design We determined BVES promoter methylation status using an Infinium HumanMethylation450 array screen of patients with UC with and without CAC. We also measured BVES mRNA levels in a tissue microarray consisting of normal colons and CAC samples. Bves−/− and wild-type mice (controls) were administered azoxymethane (AOM) and dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) to induce tumour formation. Last, we used a yeast twohybrid screen to identify BVES interactors and performed mechanistic studies in multiple cell lines to define how BVES reduces c-Myc levels. Results BVES mRNA was reduced in tumours from patients with CAC via promoter hypermethylation. Importantly, BVES promoter hypermethylation was concurrently present in distant non-malignant-appearing mucosa. As seen in human patients, Bves was underexpressed in experimental inflammatory carcinogenesis, and Bves−/− mice had increased tumour multiplicity and degree of dysplasia after AOM/DSS administration. Molecular analysis of Bves−/− tumours revealed Wnt activation and increased c-Myc levels. Mechanistically, we identified a new signalling pathway whereby BVES interacts with PR61α, a protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit, to mediate c-Myc destruction. Conclusion Loss of BVES promotes inflammatory tumourigenesis through dysregulation of Wnt signalling and the oncogene c-Myc. BVES promoter methylation status may serve as a CAC biomarker

Drugging the “Undruggable” MYCN Oncogenic Transcription Factor: Overcoming Previous Obstacles to Impact Childhood Cancers

Effective treatment of pediatric solid tumors has been hampered by the predominance of currently “undruggable” driver transcription factors. Improving outcomes while decreasing the toxicity of treatment necessitates the development of novel agents that can directly inhibit or degrade these elusive targets. MYCN in pediatric neural-derived tumors, including neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma, is a paradigmatic example of this problem. Attempts to directly and specifically target MYCN have failed due to its similarity to MYC, the unstructured nature of MYC family proteins in their monomeric form, the lack of an understanding of MYCN-interacting proteins and ability to test their relevance in vivo, the inability to obtain structural information on MYCN protein complexes, and the challenges of using traditional small molecules to inhibit protein–protein or protein–DNA interactions. However, there is now promise for directly targeting MYCN based on scientific and technological advances on all of these fronts. Here, we discuss prior challenges and the reasons for renewed optimism in directly targeting this “undruggable” transcription factor, which we hope will lead to improved outcomes for patients with pediatric cancer and create a framework for targeting driver oncoproteins regulating gene transcription

Basal promoter elements as a selective determinant of transcriptional activator function

In eukaryotes, activation of transcription involves an interplay between activators bound to cis-regulatory elements and factors bound to basal elements near the start site of transcription. The basal elements, for example the TATA box or proximal sequence element (PSE) of small nuclear RNA (snRNA) promoters, nucleate the assembly of basal transcription complexes, components of which interact with activators. Although one basal transcription complex can interact with many activators, it is unclear whether different basal transcription complexes can direct different responses to particular activators. We show here that changing the arrangement of basal elements can alter the response to transcriptional activation domains. Indeed, in the human U6 snRNA promoter, point mutation of either a TATA box or PSE results in diametrically opposed responses to VP16- and Sp1-derived activation domains. These basal elements can even discriminate small changes in an activation domain. Thus the arrangement of basal promoter elements provides a mechanism for differential regulation of transcription