Early sedation and clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study

Introduction: Sedation overuse is frequent and possibly associated with poor outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, the association of early oversedation with clinical outcomes has not been thoroughly evaluated. the aim of this study was to assess the association of early sedation strategies with outcomes of critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation (MV).Methods: A secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort conducted in 45 Brazilian ICUs, including adult patients requiring ventilatory support and sedation in the first 48 hours of ICU admissions, was performed. Sedation depth was evaluated after 48 hours of MV. Multivariate analysis was used to identify variables associated with hospital mortality.Results: A total of 322 patients were evaluated. Overall, ICU and hospital mortality rates were 30.4% and 38.8%, respectively. Deep sedation was observed in 113 patients (35.1%). Longer duration of ventilatory support was observed (7 (4 to 10) versus 5 (3 to 9) days, P = 0.041) and more tracheostomies were performed in the deep sedation group (38.9% versus 22%, P=0.001) despite similar PaO2/FiO(2) ratios and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) severity. in a multivariate analysis, age (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.03), Charlson Comorbidity Index >2 (OR 2.06; 95% Cl, 1.44 to 2.94), Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) score (OR 1.02; Cl 95%, 1.00 to 1.04), severe ARDS (OR 1.44; Cl 95%, 1.09 to 1.91) and deep sedation (OR 2.36; Cl 9596, 1.31 to 4.25) were independently associated with increased hospital mortality.Conclusions: Early deep sedation is associated with adverse outcomes and constitutes an independent predictor of hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients.Research and Education Institute from Hospital Sirio-Libanes, São PauloD'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilBrazilian Research in Intensive Care NetworkHosp Copa DOr, BR-22031010 Rio de Janeiro, BrazilHosp Sirio Libanes, Res & Educ Inst, BR-01308060 São Paulo, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Fac Med, Hosp Clin, ICU,Emergency Med Dept, BR-05403000 São Paulo, BrazilHosp Sao Camilo Pompeia, ICU, BR-05022000 São Paulo, BrazilCEPETI, BR-82530200 Curitiba, Parana, BrazilHosp Canc I, Inst Nacl Canc, ICU, BR-20230130 Rio de Janeiro, BrazilPasteur Hosp, ICU, BR-20735040 Rio de Janeiro, BrazilIrmandade Santa Casa Misericordia Porto Alegre, RIPIMI, BR-90020090 Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilVitoria Apart Hosp, ICU, BR-29161900 Serra, ES, BrazilHosp Mater Dei, ICU, BR-30140093 Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilHosp Santa Luzia, ICU, BR-70390902 Brasilia, DF, BrazilHosp Sao Luiz, ICU, BR-04544000 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Anesthesiol Pain & Intens Care Dept, ICU, BR-04024900 São Paulo, BrazilHosp Sao Jose Criciuma, ICU, BR-88801250 Criciuma, BrazilUDI Hosp, ICU, BR-65076820 Sao Luis, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Univ Hosp, ICU, BR-05508000 São Paulo, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Fac Med, Hosp Clin, ICU,Surg Emergency Dept, BR-05403000 São Paulo, BrazilIDOR DOr Inst Res & Educ, BR-22281100 Rio de Janeiro, BrazilInst Nacl Canc, Postgrad Program, BR-20230130 Rio de Janeiro, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Anesthesiol Pain & Intens Care Dept, ICU, BR-04024900 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Quality in intensive care units: proposal of an assessment instrument

Abstract Background There is an increasing need for standardized instruments for quality assessment that are able to reflect the actual conditions of the intensive care practices, especially in low and middle-income countries. The aim of this article is to describe the preparation of an instrument for quality assessment of adult intensive care services adapted to the actual conditions of intensive care in a middle-income country and comprising indicators validated in the literature. Methods The study consisted of five steps: (1) a literature survey; (2) a discussion with specialists by consensus method; (3) a pilot field test; (4) a description of indicators; and (5) an elaboration of the final version of the instrument. Each generated indicator was attributed a score (“out of standard” = 0; “below standard” = 1; “standard” = 2) that allowed calculation of the total score for each service assessed. Results A total of 62 indicators were constructed, distributed as follows: 38 structure indicators (physical structure: 4; human resources: 14; continued education and training: 2; protocols and routines: 12; material resources: 6); 17 process indicators (safety: 7; work: 10); and seven outcome indicators. The maximum possible total score was 124. Conclusions Possible future applications of the instrument for the assessment of intensive care units that was constructed in the present study include benchmarking, multicenter studies, self-assessment of intensive care units, and evaluation of changes resulting from interventions

Delirium in intensive care unit patients under noninvasive ventilation: A multinational survey Delirium em pacientes na unidade de terapia intensiva submetidos à ventilação não invasiva: Um inquérito multinacional

Objective: To conduct a multinational survey of intensive care unit professionals to determine the practices on delirium assessment and management, in addition to their perceptions and attitudes toward the evaluation and impact of delirium in patients requiring noninvasive ventilation. Methods: An electronic questionnaire was created to evaluate the profiles of the respondents and their related intensive care units, the systematic delirium assessment and management and the respondents' perceptions and attitudes regarding delirium in patients requiring noninvasive ventilation. The questionnaire was distributed to the cooperative network for research of the Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira (AMIB-Net) mailing list and to researchers in different centers in Latin America and Europe. Results: Four hundred thirty-six questionnaires were available for analysis; the majority of the questionnaires were from Brazil (61.9%), followed by Turkey (8.7%) and Italy (4.8%). Approximately 61