Dispersion as an Important Step in the Candida albicans Biofilm Developmental Cycle

Biofilms are dynamic microbial communities in which transitions between planktonic and sessile modes of growth occur interchangeably in response to different environmental cues. In the last decade, early events associated with C. albicans biofilm formation have received considerable attention. However, very little is known about C. albicans biofilm dispersion or the mechanisms and signals that trigger it. This is important because it is precisely C. albicans cells dispersed from biofilms that are the main culprits associated with candidemia and establishment of disseminated invasive disease, two of the gravest forms of candidiasis. Using a simple flow biofilm model recently developed by our group, we have performed initial investigations into the phenomenon of C. albicans biofilm dispersion, as well as the phenotypic characteristics associated with dispersed cells. Our results indicate that C. albicans biofilm dispersion is dependent on growing conditions, including carbon source and pH of the media used for biofilm development. C. albicans dispersed cells are mostly in the yeast form and display distinct phenotypic properties compared to their planktonic counterparts, including enhanced adherence, filamentation, biofilm formation and, perhaps most importantly, increased pathogenicity in a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, thus indicating that dispersed cells are armed with a complete arsenal of “virulence factors” important for seeding and establishing new foci of infection. In addition, utilizing genetically engineered strains of C. albicans (tetO-UME6 and tetO-PES1) we demonstrate that C. albicans biofilm dispersion can be regulated by manipulating levels of expression of these key genes, further supporting the evidence for a strong link between biofilms and morphogenetic conversions at different stages of the C. albicans biofilm developmental cycle. Overall, our results offer novel and important insight into the phenomenon of C. albicans biofilm dispersion, a key part of the biofilm developmental cycle, and provide the basis for its more detailed analysis

Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy

BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], >300 to 5000) and were treated with renin–angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of <15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P=0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P=0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years

Tramadol Metabolism to O-Desmethyl Tramadol (M1) and N-Desmethyl Tramadol (M2) by Dog Liver Microsomes: Species Comparison and Identification of Responsible Canine Cytochrome P450s

ABSTRACT Tramadol is widely used to manage mild to moderately painful conditions in dogs. However, this use is controversial, since clinical efficacy studies in dogs showed conflicting results, whereas pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated relatively low circulating concentrations of O-desmethyltramadol (M1). Analgesia has been attributed to the opioid effects of M1, whereas tramadol and the other major metabolite (N-desmethyltramadol, M2) are considered inactive at opioid receptors. This study aimed to determine whether cytochrome P450 (P450)-dependent M1 formation by dog liver microsomes is slower compared with cat and human liver microsomes and to identify the P450s responsible for M1 and M2 formation in canine liver. Since tramadol is used as a racemic mixture of (+)-and (2)-stereoisomers, both (+)-tramadol and (2)-tramadol were evaluated as substrates. M1 formation from tramadol by liver microsomes from dogs was slower than from cats (3.9-fold) but faster than humans (7-fold). However, M2 formation by liver microsomes from dogs was faster than those from cats (4.8-fold) and humans (19-fold). Recombinant canine P450 activities indicated that M1 was formed by CYP2D15, whereas M2 was largely formed by CYP2B11 and CYP3A12. This was confirmed by dog liver microsome studies that showed selective inhibition of M1 formation by quinidine and M2 formation by chloramphenicol and CYP2B11 antiserum, as well as induction of M2 formation by phenobarbital. Findings were similar for both (+)-tramadol and (2)-tramadol. In conclusion, low circulating M1 concentrations in dogs are explained in part by low M1 formation and high M2 formation, which is mediated by CYP2D15 and CYP2B11/CYP3A12, respectively

Oral Coadministration of Fluconazole with Tramadol Markedly Increases Plasma and Urine Concentrations of Tramadol and the O- Desmethyltramadol Metabolite in Healthy Dogs

Tramadol is used frequently in the management of mild to moderate pain conditions in dogs. This use is controversial because multiple reports in treated dogs demonstrate very low plasma concentrations of -desmethyltramadol (M1), the active metabolite. The objective of this study was to identify a drug that could be coadministered with tramadol to increase plasma M1 concentrations, thereby enhancing analgesic efficacy. In vitro studies were initially conducted to identify a compound that inhibited tramadol metabolism to -desmethyltramadol (M2) and M1 metabolism to , -didesmethyltramadol (M5) without reducing tramadol metabolism to M1. A randomized crossover drug-drug interaction study was then conducted by administering this inhibitor or placebo with tramadol to 12 dogs. Blood and urine samples were collected to measure tramadol, tramadol metabolites, and inhibitor concentrations. After screening 86 compounds, fluconazole was the only drug found to inhibit M2 and M5 formation potently without reducing M1 formation. Four hours after tramadol administration to fluconazole-treated dogs, there were marked statistically significant ( < 0.001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test) increases in plasma tramadol (31-fold higher) and M1 (39-fold higher) concentrations when compared with placebo-treated dogs. Conversely, plasma M2 and M5 concentrations were significantly lower (11-fold and 3-fold, respectively; < 0.01) in fluconazole-treated dogs. Metabolite concentrations in urine followed a similar pattern. This is the first study to demonstrate a potentially beneficial drug-drug interaction in dogs through enhancing plasma tramadol and M1 concentrations. Future studies are needed to determine whether adding fluconazole can enhance the analgesic efficacy of tramadol in healthy dogs and clinical patients experiencing pain