Building capacities in research for blood services in Africa

Background: Capacity building of African based blood services researchers has been identified as key in developing a sustainable programme of generation local evidence to support sound decision making. There are a number of research training programmes that have been instituted targeted at blood services in Africa. The article shares programme experiences of building research capacities for blood services in Africa. Methodology: The Francophone Africa Transfusion Medicine Research Training network, the NIH REDS-III and NIH Fogarty South Africa programmes and T-REC (Building research capacities in Africa) have been the key research capacity programmes targeting blood services in Africa over the last decade. Data were drawn from research outputs, publications and end of programme reports. The focus was to understand their experiences on the implementation of the capacity building programmes highlighting the success, challenges and the main research outputs from their initiatives. Results: The Francophone research network achievements included more than 135 trainees and in excess of 30 publications. The NIH REDS study the achievements included more than 12 research publications with South Africa junior investigators as lead authors. The NIH Fogarty program currently includes 56 short course trainees, 5 Masters and 6 PhD candidates. The four year (2011-2015, funding period) T-REC research capacity has as of 2020 managed to produce 4 PhDs, 42 in-service Diploma in Project Design and Management (DPDM), and supported bursaries for 60 Masters/undergraduate research. The main common challenges in the running of the research programmes include shortages of in-country mentoring and identified needs in high quality research grants writing. Discussion and conclusion: It has been noted that the key achievements for the blood services research capacity building include a mix of short courses, medium-term (epidemiology & biostats) and MS/PhD degree training. Also, having a train the trainers to develop in-country mentors has been instrumental. Overall, the key recommendations for blood services research capacity building include the need for research collaborations with high-income countries which can jump-start research. For a sustainable research programme, eventually there is need for in-country grant-writing capacity building

Kinetics of CD4+ T-cell recovery amongst HIV load suppressed patients on first-line antiretroviral therapy in Yaoundé, Cameroon

HIV infected patients on Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) are exposed to various immunological disorders. Immune reconstitution is one of the most challenging problem linked to morbidity and mortality in HIV patients. This study aimed at evaluating the kinetics of CD4+ T-cell recovery amongst HIV load suppressed patients on first-line ART in Yaoundé, Cameroon. This was a retrospective cohort study performed at the care and treatment units of the Yaoundé University Teaching Hospital and Essos Hospital Center, with viral suppressed patients initiated on ART between March and July 2015. Data were collected using a standard form and analyzed using R.3.6.2 software. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant for a 95%CI. Of the 499 viral suppressed participants, 32% (n=160) were male and 68% (n=339) female; 33% and 40% had severe and moderate immunodepression at baseline, respectively; 9% and 28% remain respectively on the same immunological state. CD4+ T-cell count increased by 73%, 49% and 29% for patients that started treatment, with CD4+ <150 cells/ml, 150<CD4+<350 cells/ml and 350<CD4+<500 cells/ml, respectively and 14%, 34% and 40% reached a target of 500 cells/ml or more after 4 years of treatment. Elder patients and males were likely to have CD4+ T-cells less than 350 Cells/ml. Approximately 35% of patient started treatment with CD4+ T-cells <350 Cells/ml. CD4+ T-cells increased significantly during 4 years of treatment but, just 29% in average achieved CD4+ ≥ 500 cells/ml. CD4 T-cells recovery represent and important challenge in the immunological monitoring of long-term HIV infected patients on ART

Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in a high prevalence country by an antigen/antibody combination assay versus a rapid test.

In low-income-countries, screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is often based on rapid tests (RT). Their lower sensitivity compared to enzyme immunoassay (EIA) suggests that newer HCV Antigen/Antibody (Ag/Ab) combination assays might have a role in such countries. To test this idea, 1998 blood donors were tested at the University Teaching Hospital blood bank in Yaoundé, Cameroon simultaneously with a RT (HCV rapid test, Human Diagnostics, Berlin, Germany) according to standard practice (S1) and with an Ag/Ab assay (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab Ultra, Biorad, France) (S2). All discordant, borderline and reactive samples were submitted to confirmatory testing by immunoblot and/or HCV-RNA. Of the 86 (4.3%) samples positive with one or both strategies, 29 were confirmed negative, 37 positive and 20 were false positive or resolved infection. There was a significant difference in test sensitivity (p=0.01) between S1 (70.3%) and S2 (91.9%) but not in test specificity (99.4% and 98.6%, respectively). The benefit of the Ag/Ab assay in the detection of recent HCV seronegative infections could not be evaluated since no Antigen-only donations were identified. However, better Ag/Ab test sensitivity compared to RT supports the implementation of these newer immunoassays for HCV screening in the African blood bank setting