FRANCO GIRALDI

Joan Ripollés Tranzo (2002). FRANCO GIRALDI. Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (41). http://hdl.handle.net/10251/41309.Importación Masiva4

ESTO NO ES LO QUE PARECE

Joan Rípollés Tranzo (2002). ESTO NO ES LO QUE PARECE. Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (41). http://hdl.handle.net/10251/41303.Importación Masiva4

LISS panel - Mental health issues in the workplace - Employees

Tranzo, the scientific center for care and welfare of the Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, seeks to study mental health issues in the workplace. This questionnaire focuses on employees and is one of the two questionnaires Tranzo financed.Suggestions for data usage: The data files are accessible via Centerdata. For more information, please use the link under Relations or www.lissdata.nl

LISS panel - Mental health issues in the workplace - Managers

Tranzo, the scientific center for care and welfare of the Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, seeks out to study mental health problems in the workplace. This questionnaire focuses on people who are in command of others and is one of the two questionnaires Tranzo financed.Suggestions for data usage: The data files are accessible via Centerdata. For more information, please use the link under Relations or www.lissdata.nl

Replication Data for: Evaluation study narrative educational program, 2021

The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of a co-designed educational program aimed at promoting narrative approaches in nursing homes. A mixed-methods evaluation study was conducted, adopting a pragmatic approach to answer the following research questions: Following participation in the ‘Tell Me! Learning from Narratives’ program, what is the impact on nursing and care students’ knowledge and person-centred practice? What factors influence this learning

Enhanced anonymity in tax experiments does not affect compliance

In the domain of classical economic games, it has previously been suggested that deviations from purely rational behavior could be explained by a lack of experimenter-subject anonymity. In fact, some experiments show that contributions and prosocial behavior increase when participants feel observed. In the present study, we investigate whether measures of enhanced anonymity, beyond a conventional standard, are necessary in the particular case of tax behavior experiments. This issue might be pivotal for both the validity and generalizability of existing published studies as well as for designing future studies. We suspect social desirability to be even more relevant in experiments on tax compliance, which often apply a context-rich setting, entailing a strong ethical component. Interestingly, certain common experimental practices reflect potential breaches of anonymity during sign-up, the actual task, and the payment phase. Accordingly, we tested whether (1) tax compliance is higher under conditions of regular anonymity compared to enhanced anonymity, and (2) whether this anonymity manipulation moderates established effects of tax-related parameters, such as audit probability and fine rate. Despite an enhanced perception of anonymity due to our manipulation, we did not observe a difference in relative tax compliance between the regular and enhanced anonymity conditions. Additionally, enhanced anonymity did not interact with the effects of tax rate, audit probability, and fine level on tax compliance. We conclude that commonly used procedures in tax experiments are sufficient to guarantee a satisfactory level of anonymity. The first author received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 798824) for the drafting of this paper

Replication data for: Sexual health for people with intellectual disabilities according to support staff and relatives.

These files contain the data of a concept mapping study on sexual health for people with mild intellectual disabilities from the perspective of support staff and relatives

Replication data for: Sexual health according to people with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.

These files contain the data of a concept mapping study on sexual health from the perspective of people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities

Enhanced anonymity in tax experiments does not affect compliance

In the domain of classical economic games, it has previously been suggested that deviations from purely rational behavior could be explained by a lack of experimenter-subject anonymity. In fact, some experiments show that contributions and prosocial behavior increase when participants feel observed. In the present study, we investigate whether measures of enhanced anonymity, beyond a conventional standard, are necessary in the particular case of tax behavior experiments. This issue might be pivotal for both the validity and generalizability of existing published studies as well as for designing future studies. We suspect social desirability to be even more relevant in experiments on tax compliance, which often apply a context-rich setting, entailing a strong ethical component. Interestingly, certain common experimental practices reflect potential breaches of anonymity during sign-up, the actual task, and the payment phase. Accordingly, we tested whether (1) tax compliance is higher under conditions of regular anonymity compared to enhanced anonymity, and (2) whether this anonymity manipulation moderates established effects of tax-related parameters, such as audit probability and fine rate. Despite an enhanced perception of anonymity due to our manipulation, we did not observe a difference in relative tax compliance between the regular and enhanced anonymity conditions. Additionally, enhanced anonymity did not interact with the effects of tax rate, audit probability, and fine level on tax compliance. We conclude that commonly used procedures in tax experiments are sufficient to guarantee a satisfactory level of anonymity. The first author received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 798824) for the drafting of this paper

Replication Data for: DECIDES Study

This study investigates the effects of a stigma awareness intervention, that may protect people against the harmful effects of stigma in the workplace. A cluster randomized controlled trial with four measurements over 12 months was conducted in which the effects of a Dutch version of the CORAL decision aid tool (i.e. CORAL.NL), combined with a stigma awareness training for employment specialists are examined on finding and retaining paid employment, and on decisional conflict. Files can be requested from Tilburg University, Department of Tranzo, for verification or further research (via Contact Owner button). Due to the sensitive nature of the subject, the results are not made available as Open Access