Prion meeting 2023: implications of a growing field

\ua9 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.The history of human prion diseases began with the original description, by Hans Gerhard Creutzfeldt and by Alfons Maria Jakob, of patients with a severe brain disease that included speech abnormalities, confusion, and myoclonus, in a disease that was then named Creutzfeldt Jakob disease (CJD). Later, in Papua New Guinea, a disease characterized by trembling was identified, and given the name “Kuru”. Neuropathological examination of the brains from CJD and Kuru patients, and of brains of sheep with scrapie disease revealed significant similarities and suggested a possible common mode of infection that, at the time, was thought to derive from an unknown virus that caused slow infections. John Stanley Griffith hypothesized that the agent causing these diseases was “probably a protein without nucleic acid” and, in 1982, Stanley Prusiner reported the identification of a proteinaceous infectious particle (coining the term prion) that was resistant to inactivation methods that were at the time standard for nucleic acids, and identified PrP as the major protein component of the infectious agent in scrapie and in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, classifying this also as a prion disease. Interestingly, the prion concept had been previously expanded to yeast proteins capable of replicating their conformation, seeding their own aggregation and transmitting phenotypic information. The prion concept has been more recently expanded to refer to misfolded proteins that are capable of converting a normal form of a protein into an abnormal form. The quest to understand and treat prion diseases has united a specific research community around the topic, and regular meetings (Prion Meetings) have taken place over the years to enable discussions, train junior researchers, and inspire research in the field

Amyloid Plaques Beyond Aβ: A Survey of the Diverse Modulators of Amyloid Aggregation

Aggregation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide is strongly correlated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recent research has improved our understanding of the kinetics of amyloid fibril assembly and revealed new details regarding different stages in plaque formation. Presently, interest is turning toward studying this process in a holistic context, focusing on cellular components which interact with the Aβ peptide at various junctures during aggregation, from monomer to cross-β amyloid fibrils. However, even in isolation, a multitude of factors including protein purity, pH, salt content, and agitation affect Aβ fibril formation and deposition, often producing complicated and conflicting results. The failure of numerous inhibitors in clinical trials for AD suggests that a detailed examination of the complex interactions that occur during plaque formation, including binding of carbohydrates, lipids, nucleic acids, and metal ions, is important for understanding the diversity of manifestations of the disease. Unraveling how a variety of key macromolecular modulators interact with the Aβ peptide and change its aggregation properties may provide opportunities for developing therapies. Since no protein acts in isolation, the interplay of these diverse molecules may differentiate disease onset, progression, and severity, and thus are worth careful consideration