7 research outputs found

    ArrĂȘt cardio-respiratoire en hĂ©modialyse chronique : facteurs de risque, prĂ©vention et conduite Ă  tenir en 2015

    No full text
    International audiencePatients undergoing hemodialysis have a 10 to 20 times higher risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) than the general population. Sudden cardiac death is a rare event (approximately 1 event per 10,000 sessions) but has a very high mortality rate. Epidemiological data comes almost exclusively from North American studies; there is a great lack of European data on the subject. Ventricular arrhythmia is the main mechanism of sudden cardiac deaths in dialysis patients. These patients develop increased sensitivity mainly due to a high prevalence of severe ischemic heart disease and left ventricular hypertrophy and to a frequent trigger event: electrolytic and plasma volume shifts during dialysis sessions. Unfortunately, accurate predictive markers of SCA do not exist, however some primary prevention trials using beta-blockers or angiotensin II receptor blockers are encouraging, while the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the population of chronic dialysis patients remains controversial. Identification of patients at risk, minimizing trigger events such as electrolytic shifts and improving team skills in the diagnosis and initial resuscitation with the latest recommendations from 2010 seem necessary to reduce incidence and improve survival in this high risk population. Organization of European studies would also allow a more accurate view of this reality in our dialysis units.Le patient en hĂ©modialyse chronique a un risque d’arrĂȘt cardio-respiratoire (ACR) 10 Ă  20 fois plus Ă©levĂ© que la population gĂ©nĂ©rale. Il s’agit d’un Ă©vĂ©nement rare (environ 1 Ă©vĂ©nement par 10 000 sĂ©ances), mais le taux de mortalitĂ© reste trĂšs Ă©levĂ©. Les donnĂ©es Ă©pidĂ©miologiques actuelles proviennent quasi exclusivement d’études nord-amĂ©ricaines et l’on manque de donnĂ©es issues de registres europĂ©ens sur le sujet. Les troubles du rythme ventriculaires graves sont le mode de survenue majoritaire de l’ACR dans cette population de dialysĂ©s chroniques qui cumule, d’une part, un terrain de sensibilitĂ© accrue de par la forte prĂ©valence de la cardiopathie ischĂ©mique et l’hypertrophie ventriculaire gauche principalement, et, d’autre part, un Ă©vĂ©nement dĂ©clencheur frĂ©quent : les variations Ă©lectrolytiques et volĂ©miques inhĂ©rentes aux sĂ©ances de dialyse. Les marqueurs prĂ©dictifs de la survenue d’ACR sont encore imparfaitement dĂ©finis. Des Ă©tudes de prĂ©vention primaire mĂ©dicamenteuse utilisant les bĂȘtabloquants ou les bloqueurs du systĂšme rĂ©nine-angiotensine-aldostĂ©rone sont encourageantes, tandis que l’utilisation des dĂ©fibrillateurs automatisĂ©s implantables dans la population de dialysĂ©s chroniques reste controversĂ©e. L’identification des patients Ă  risque, la minimisation des Ă©vĂ©nements dĂ©clencheurs comme les variations Ă©lectrolytiques, et l’amĂ©lioration de la formation des Ă©quipes au diagnostic et aux premiĂšres mesures de rĂ©animation grĂące aux derniĂšres recommandations datant de 2010 semblent nĂ©cessaires afin de diminuer l’incidence et d’amĂ©liorer la survie dans cette population Ă  fort risque. L’organisation d’études europĂ©ennes permettrait par ailleurs d’avoir une vision plus prĂ©cise de cette rĂ©alitĂ© dans nos centres

    Iron deficiency in heart failure patients: the French CARENFER prospective study

    No full text
    International audienceAimsIron deficiency (ID) is reported as one of the main co-morbidities in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), which then influences quality of life and prognosis. The CARENFER study aimed to assess the prevalence of ID in a large panel of heart failure (HF) patients at different stages of the disease.Methods and resultsThis prospective cross-sectional nationwide study was conducted in 48 medical units in France in 2019. Serum ferritin concentration and transferrin saturation (TSAT) index were determined in all eligible patients with a diagnosis of HF. ID diagnosis was based on the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2016 guidelines. Patients were classified as having either a decompensated HF or a CHF. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was categorized as preserved (≄50%), mildly reduced (40–49%), or reduced (<40%). ID diagnosis was determined in 1661 patients, of whom 1475 could be classified as having a decompensated HF or a CHF. Patients' median age was 78 years. Decompensated HF represented 60.1% of cases. The overall prevalence of ID was 49.6% (47.1–52.1). In CHF and decompensated HF patients, respectively, ID prevalence was 39.0% (35.1–43.1) and 58.1% (54.7–61.4), P < 0.001; TSAT < 20% was respectively reported in 34.7% and 70.0% of patients (P < 0.001). Patients with preserved LVEF were more likely to have an ID (57.5%) compared with patients with mildly reduced (47.4%) or reduced LVEF (44.3%) (P < 0.001).ConclusionsIron deficiency was highly prevalent in patients with decompensated HF or CHF with preserved LVEF. ID prevalence defined by TSAT was higher than by the ESC criteria in decompensated HF patients, questioning the importance of ID definition to assess its prevalence

    012: Use of invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction is a major determinant of improved long-term survival. The FAST-MI registry

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesWe assessed the impact of invasive strategy (IS) versus a conservative strategy (CS) on in-hospital complications and three-year outcomes in patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) from the FAST-MI registry.BackgroundResults from randomized trials comparing IS and CS in patients with NSTEMI are conflicting.MethodsOf the 3,670 patients in the FAST-MI registry, which included patients with acute myocardial infarction (within 48 hours) over a one-month period in France at the end of 2005, 1,645 presented with NSTEMI.ResultsOf the 1,645 patients analyzed, 80% had an IS. Patients in the IS group were younger (67±12 vs. 80±11 years), less often women (29% vs. 51%) and had a lower GRACE risk score (137±36 vs. 178±34) as compared with patient treated with CS. In-hospital mortality and blood transfusions were significantly more frequent in patients with CS as compared with IS (13.1 vs. 2.0%, 9.1 vs. 4.6%). Use of IS was associated with a significant reduction in 3-year mortality and cardiovascular death (17% vs. 60%, adjusted HR: 0.44; 95%CI: 0.35-0.55 and 8% vs. 36%, adjusted HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.27-0.50). After propensity score matching (181 patients per group), 3-year survival was significantly higher in patients treated with IS.ConclusionsIn a real-world setting of patients admitted with NSTEMI, the use of IS during the initial hospital stay is an independent predictor of improved 3-year survival, regardless of age
    corecore