Maternal and paternal genomes differentially affect myofibre characteristics and muscle weights of bovine fetuses at midgestation

Postnatal myofibre characteristics and muscle mass are largely determined during fetal development and may be significantly affected by epigenetic parent-of-origin effects. However, data on such effects in prenatal muscle development that could help understand unexplained variation in postnatal muscle traits are lacking. In a bovine model we studied effects of distinct maternal and paternal genomes, fetal sex, and non-genetic maternal effects on fetal myofibre characteristics and muscle mass. Data from 73 fetuses (Day153, 54% term) of four genetic groups with purebred and reciprocal cross Angus and Brahman genetics were analyzed using general linear models. Parental genomes explained the greatest proportion of variation in myofibre size of Musculus semitendinosus (80–96%) and in absolute and relative weights of M. supraspinatus, M. longissimus dorsi, M. quadriceps femoris and M. semimembranosus (82–89% and 56–93%, respectively). Paternal genome in interaction with maternal genome (P<0.05) explained most genetic variation in cross sectional area (CSA) of fast myotubes (68%), while maternal genome alone explained most genetic variation in CSA of fast myofibres (93%, P<0.01). Furthermore, maternal genome independently (M. semimembranosus, 88%, P<0.0001) or in combination (M. supraspinatus, 82%; M. longissimus dorsi, 93%; M. quadriceps femoris, 86%) with nested maternal weight effect (5–6%, P<0.05), was the predominant source of variation for absolute muscle weights. Effects of paternal genome on muscle mass decreased from thoracic to pelvic limb and accounted for all (M. supraspinatus, 97%, P<0.0001) or most (M. longissimus dorsi, 69%, P<0.0001; M. quadriceps femoris, 54%, P<0.001) genetic variation in relative weights. An interaction between maternal and paternal genomes (P<0.01) and effects of maternal weight (P<0.05) on expression of H19, a master regulator of an imprinted gene network, and negative correlations between H19 expression and fetal muscle mass (P<0.001), suggested imprinted genes and miRNA interference as mechanisms for differential effects of maternal and paternal genomes on fetal muscle.Ruidong Xiang, Mani Ghanipoor-Samami, William H. Johns, Tanja Eindorf, David L. Rutley, Zbigniew A. Kruk, Carolyn J. Fitzsimmons, Dana A. Thomsen, Claire T. Roberts, Brian M. Burns, Gail I. Anderson, Paul L. Greenwood, Stefan Hiendlede

Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study using a sheep cervical spine interbody fusion model. OBJECTIVES: To compare interbody fusion of an autologous tricortical iliac crest bone graft with two bioabsorbable cages and to determine whether there are differences between the three interbody fusion techniques in 1) the ability to preserve postoperative distraction, 2) the biomechanical stability, and 3) the histologic characteristics of intervertebral bone matrix formation. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Bioabsorbable cages would be beneficial compared with metallic cages; however, currently no suitable bioabsorbable interbody fusion cage is available. METHOD: Twenty-four sheep underwent C3/C4 discectomy and fusion. The following stabilization techniques were used: Group 1) autologous tricortical iliac crest bone graft (n = 8); Group 2) bioabsorbable cage made of 70/30 poly(l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide) (experimental) filled with autologous cancellous bone graft (n = 8); Group 3) bioabsorbable cage made of a polymer-calciumphosphate composite (Biomet Europe, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) filled with autologous cancellous bone graft (n = 8). Radiographic scans to determine disc space height were performed before and after surgery and after 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively. After 12 weeks, animals were killed, and fusion sites were evaluated using functional radiographic views in flexion and extension. Quantitative computed tomographic scans were used to assess bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and bony callus volume. Biomechanical testing was performed in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending to determine stiffness, ROM, and neutral and elastic zone. Histomorphological and histomorphometrical analysis were performed to evaluate fusion and foreign body reactions associated with the bioabsorbable cages. RESULTS: Over a 12-week period, the polymer-calciumphosphate composite cage showed significantly higher values for disc space height compared with the bone graft and the poly(l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide) cage. Additionally, the polymer-calciumphosphate composite cage demonstrated a significantly higher stiffness and lower ROM, neutral zone, and elastic zone in axial rotation and lateral bending than any other group. However, quantitative computed tomographic scans demonstrated cracks in six of the eight polymer-calciumphosphate composite cages after 12 weeks. Histologically, the highest bone volume/total volume ratio and the highest fusion rate were found in the polymer-calciumphosphate composite cage group. Although the poly(l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide) cage showed grade I through III foreign body reactions in all fusion areas, only two animals developed grade I foreign body reactions with the polymer-calciumphosphate composite cage. CONCLUSION: After 12 weeks, there was no significant difference between the bioabsorbable poly(l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide) cage and the tricortical bone graft. In comparison to the tricortical bone graft, the bioabsorbable polymer-calciumphosphate composite cage showed significantly better distractive properties, a significantly higher biomechanical stiffness, and an advanced interbody fusion; however, six of eight polymer-calciumphosphate composite cages cracked. Although the fate of the foreign body reactions and the cracks is currently unclear for both bioabsorbable cages, the early appearance of large osteolysis associated with use of the poly(l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide) cage allows skepticism regarding the value of this bioabsorbable implant.Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Eindorf T, Schnake K. J. and Haas N. P

Sphene ceramics for orthopedic coating applications: An in vitro and in vivo study

Copyright © 2009 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd.The host response to titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) is not always favorable as a fibrous layer may form at the skeletal tissue-device interface, causing aseptic loosening. Recently, sphene (CaTiSiO(5)) ceramics were developed by incorporating Ti in the Ca-Si system, and found to exhibit improved chemical stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vitro response of human osteoblast-like cells, human osteoclasts and human microvascular endothelial cells to sphene ceramics and determine whether coating Ti-6Al-4V implants with sphene enhances anchorage to surrounding bone. The study showed that sphene ceramics support human osteoblast-like cell attachment with organized cytoskeleton structure and express increased mRNA levels of osteoblast-related genes. Sphene ceramics were able to induce the differentiation of monocytes to form functional osteoclasts with the characteristic features of f-actin and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin, and express osteoclast-related genes. Human endothelial cells were also able to attach and express the endothelial cell markers ZO-1 and VE-Cadherin when cultured on sphene ceramics. Histological staining, enzyme histochemistry and immunolabelling were used for identification of mineralized bone and bone remodelling around the coated implants. Ti-6Al-4V implants coated with sphene showed new bone formation and filled the gap between the implants and existing bone in a manner comparable to that of the hydroxyapatite coatings used as control. The new bone was in direct contact with the implants, whereas fibrous tissue formed between the bone and implant with uncoated Ti-6Al-4V. The in vivo assessment of sphene-coated implants supports our in vitro observation and suggests that they have the ability to recruit osteogenic cells, and thus support bone formation around the implants and enhance osseointegration.Yogambha Ramaswamy, Chengtie Wu, Colin R. Dunstan, Benjamin Hewson, Tanja Eindorf, Gail I. Anderson and Hala Zreiqa