Dry Needling for Spine Related Disorders: a Scoping Review

Introduction/Background: The depth and breadth of research on dry needling (DN) has not been evaluated specifically for symptomatic spine related disorders (SRD) from myofascial trigger points (TrP), disc, nerve and articular structures not due to serious pathologies. Current literature appears to support DN for treatment of TrP. Goals of this review include identifying research published on DN treatment for SRD, sites of treatment and outcomes studied. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following Levac et al.’s five part methodological framework to determine the current state of the literature regarding DN for patients with SRD. Results: Initial and secondary search strategies yielded 55 studies in the cervical (C) region (71.43%) and 22 in the thoracolumbar-pelvic (TLP) region (28.57%). Most were randomized controlled trials (60% in C, 45.45% in TLP) and clinical trials (18.18% in C, 22.78% in TLP). The most commonly treated condition was TrP for both the C and TLP regions. In the C region, DN was provided to 23 different muscles, with the trapezius as treatment site in 41.88% of studies. DN was applied to 31 different structures in the TLP region. In the C region, there was one treatment session in 23 studies (41.82%) and 2–6 treatments in 25 (45.45%%). For the TLP region, one DN treatment was provided in 8 of the 22 total studies (36.36%) and 2–6 in 9 (40.9%). The majority of experimental designs had DN as the sole intervention. For both C and TLP regions, visual analogue scale, pressure pain threshold and range of motion were the most common outcomes. Conclusion: For SRD, DN was primarily applied to myofascial structures for pain or TrP diagnoses. Many outcomes were improved regardless of diagnosis or treatment parameters. Most studies applied just one treatment which may not reflect common clinical practice. Further research is warranted to determine optimal treatment duration and frequency. Most studies looked at DN as the sole intervention. It is unclear whether DN alone or in addition to other treatment procedures would provide superior outcomes. Functional outcome tools best suited to tracking the outcomes of DN for SRD should be explored.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00310-

_

SUMMARY Several factors that influence the evolution of the unusual head morphology of hammerhead sharks (family Sphyrnidae) are proposed but few are empirically tested. In this study we tested the 'enhanced binocular field' hypothesis (that proposes enhanced frontal binocularity) by comparison of the visual fields of three hammerhead species: the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini, and the winghead shark, Eusphyra blochii, with that of two carcharhinid species: the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris, and the blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus. Additionally, eye rotation and head yaw were quantified to determine if species compensate for large blind areas anterior to the head. The winghead shark possessed the largest anterior binocular overlap (48deg.) and was nearly four times larger than that of the lemon (10deg.) and blacknose (11deg.) sharks. The binocular overlap in the scalloped hammerhead sharks (34deg.) was greater than the bonnethead sharks (13deg.) and carcharhinid species; however, the bonnethead shark did not differ from the carcharhinids. These results indicate that binocular overlap has increased with lateral head expansion in hammerhead sharks. The hammerhead species did not demonstrate greater eye rotation in the anterior or posterior direction. However, both the scalloped hammerhead and bonnethead sharks exhibited greater head yaw during swimming (16.9deg. and 15.6deg., respectively) than the lemon (15.1deg.) and blacknose (15.0deg.) sharks, indicating a behavioral compensation for the anterior blind area. This study illustrates the larger binocular overlap in hammerhead species relative to their carcharhinid sister taxa and is consistent with the 'enhanced binocular field' hypothesis. Supplementary material available online a

Problemas de salud y la vulnerabilidad social en pacientes inmigrantes ingresados con patología infecciosa: estudio caso-control

Introducción. La necesidad de recursos sanitarios de la población inmigrante ha aumentado en los últimos años. El estudio de los problemas de salud y la vulnerabilidad social planteados durante el ingreso hospitalario de estos pacientes ayudaría a mejorar su cuidado. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio caso-control realizado en el Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Se incluyeron pacientes inmigrantes ingresados con patología infecciosa de octubre de 2002 a septiembre de 2003. Los casos fueron apareados por edad, sexo e infección por virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Se evaluaron variables clínicas (visitas a Urgencias, días y número de ingresos, cantidad de procedimientos y fármacos, diagnóstico etiológico y control post alta) y de vulnerabilidad social (utilización de trabajo social, tarjeta sanitaria, cuidador de referencia, consumo de tóxicos, barrera idiomática y alta de enfermería). Resultados. Se estudiaron 102 pacientes (51 casos y 51 controles, todos varones). El 56% estaban infectados por VIH en ambos grupos. El número de procedimientos diagnósticos o terapéuticos fue mayor en el grupo de inmigrantes (p = 0,02), se llegó en menor proporción a un diagnóstico etiológico (el 82% frente al 98%, p = 0,021) y el número de visitas post alta fue inferior (el 55% frente al 77%, p = 0,04). Los pacientes inmigrantes tuvieron unos índices de vulnerabilidad social mayores que la población autóctona y en un 35% de ellos existía una barrera idiomática. Un menor número tenían tarjeta sanitaria (el 63% frente al 94%, p < 0,0001) y un número mayor tuvieron necesidad de traslado a un centro sociosanitario (el 16% frente al 2%, p = 0,01). Discusión La vulnerabilidad social de los pacientes inmigrantes influye en una menor obtención del diagnóstico etiológico, mayor número de procedimientos durante la hospitalización y un menor seguimiento posterior al alta