Kuusen ja männyn paksuuskasvu on sopeutunut paikalliseen ilmastoon

Artikkeli julkaistu alunperin metla.fi sivustoll

Estimating intraseasonal intrinsic water-use efficiency from high-resolution tree-ring delta C-13 data in boreal Scots pine forests

Intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE), a key index for carbon and water balance, has been widely estimated from tree-ring delta C-13 at annual resolution, but rarely at high-resolution intraseasonal scale. We estimated high-resolution iWUE from laser-ablation delta C-13 analysis of tree-rings (iWUE(iso)) and compared it with iWUE derived from gas exchange (iWUE(gas)) and eddy covariance (iWUE(EC)) data for two Pinus sylvestris forests from 2002 to 2019. By carefully timing iWUE(iso) via modeled tree-ring growth, iWUE(iso) aligned well with iWUE(gas) and iWUE(EC) at intraseasonal scale. However, year-to-year patterns of iWUE(gas), iWUE(iso), and iWUE(EC) were different, possibly due to distinct environmental drivers on iWUE across leaf, tree, and ecosystem scales. We quantified the modification of iWUE(iso) by postphotosynthetic delta C-13 enrichment from leaf sucrose to tree rings and by nonexplicit inclusion of mesophyll and photorespiration terms in photosynthetic discrimination model, which resulted in overestimation of iWUE(iso) by up to 11% and 14%, respectively. We thus extended the application of tree-ring delta C-13 for iWUE estimates to high-resolution intraseasonal scale. The comparison of iWUE(gas), iWUE(iso), and iWUE(EC) provides important insights into physiological acclimation of trees across leaf, tree, and ecosystem scales under climate change and improves the upscaling of ecological models.Peer reviewe

Tree organ growth and carbon allocation dynamics impact the magnitude and δ13C signal of stem and soil CO2 fluxes

Incomplete knowledge of carbon (C) allocation dynamics in trees hinders accurate modeling and future predictions of tree growth. We studied C allocation dynamics in a mature Pinus sylvestris L. dominated forest with a novel analytical approach, allowing the first comparison of: (i) magnitude and delta C-13 of shoot, stem and soil CO2 fluxes (A(shoot), R-stem and R-soil), (ii) concentration and delta C-13 of compound-specific and/or bulk non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) in phloem and roots and (iii) growth of stem and fine roots. Results showed a significant effect of phloem NSC concentrations on tracheid growth, and both variables significantly impacted R-stem. Also, concentrations of root NSCs, especially starch, had a significant effect on fine root growth, although no effect of root NSC concentrations or root growth was detected on R-soil. Time series analysis between delta C-13 of A(shoot) and delta C-13 of R-stem or delta C-13 of R-soil revealed strengthened C allocation to stem or roots under high C demands. Furthermore, we detected a significant correlation between delta C-13 of R-stem and delta C-13 of phloem sucrose and glucose, but not for starch or water-soluble carbohydrates. Our results indicate the need to include C allocation dynamics into tree growth models. We recommend using compound-specific concentration and delta C-13 analysis to reveal C allocation processes that may not be detected by the conventional approach that utilizes bulk organic matter.Peer reviewe

Reply to Elmendorf and Ettinger: Photoperiod playsa dominantand irreplaceable role in triggering secondary growth resumption

In their Letter, Elmendorf and Ettinger (1) question the dominant role of photoperiod in driving secondary growth resumption (hereafter referred to as xylem formation onset) of the Northern Hemisphere conifers, recently reported by Huang et al. (2). Their opinions are grounded on the following three aspects, including 1) the seasonality of the photoperiod, 2) the dependence of the predictor variables (e.g., photoperiod, forcing, and chilling) on the response variable (the date of onset of xylem formation, day of the year [DOY]), and 3) the limited value of the obtained models for interannual forecasting. We think they bring up an interesting issue that deserves further discussion and clarification. Photoperiod is acknowledged to regulate spring bud swelling while wood formation starts (3, 4). Although photoperiod seasonality occurs at each site, its influence is marginal in our study given that the analysis involved comparisons among sites across the Northern Hemisphere. Our conclusion that photoperiod plays a dominant role was built upon the combination of several coherent pieces of evidence, rather than “the crux of Huang et al….” as they pointed out. First, we clearly stated that model 2, which modeled DOY as a function of the mean annual temperature of the site (MAT), forcing, chilling, and soil moisture, was considered the best model in terms of parsimony according to minimum Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion, rather than R2 as referred to in their Letter. Second, photoperiod interacted with MAT and can explain 61.7% of the variance of MAT alone (2). Therefore, we concluded that secondary growth resumption was driven primarily by MAT and photoperiod or by their interaction, which is challenging to be disentangled without experimental data, we agree. In terms of biological functioning, they play an ..

Comparison of phloem and xylem hydraulic architecture in Picea abies stems

2015väitöskirj