Child protection procedures in emergency departments

Background: Emergency departments (EDs) may be the first point at which children who have been subject to abuse or neglect come into contact with professionals who are able to act for their protection. In order to ascertain current procedures for identifying and managing child abuse, we conducted a survey of EDs in England and Northern Ireland. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to the lead professionals in a random sample of 81 EDs in England and 20 in Northern Ireland. Departments were asked to provide copies of their procedures for child protection. These were analysed qualitatively using a structured template. Results: A total of 74 questionnaires were returned. 91.3% of departments had written protocols for child protection. Of these, 27 provided copies of their protocols for analysis. Factors judged to improve the practical usefulness of protocols included: those that were brief; were specific to the department; incorporated both medical and nursing management; included relevant contact details; included a single page flow chart which could be accessed separately. 25/71 (35.2%) departments reported that they used a checklist to highlight concerns. The most common factors on the checklists included an inconsistent history or one which did not match the examination; frequent attendances; delay in presentation; or concerns about the child’s appearance or behaviour, or the parent–child interaction. Conclusions: There is a lack of consistency in the approach to identifying and responding to child abuse in EDs. Drawing on the results of this survey, we are able to suggest good practice guidelines for the management of suspected child abuse in EDs. Minimum standards could improve management and facilitate clinical audit and relevant training

5-Aminolevulinic acid-mediated fluorescence diagnosis of colon cancer: A histopathological comparison of fluorescent and non-fluorescent tumours

Background: 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) selectively accumulates in cancer cells and is metabolised in the mitochondria to the fluorophore protoporphyrin IX. The GLiSten trial evaluated 5-ALA as a fluorescent probe for intraoperative detection of colon cancer and lymph node metastases. Only 13 of 40 cases showed fluorescence, suggesting a fundamental difference between fluorescent and non-fluorescent cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differences in fluorescence were due to tumour cellularity, in particular T cell infiltration, which may be of prognostic significance. Method: Primary tumour tissue was available from 30 patients. The density of tumour cells, vascularity and stromal compartment size were quantified using digitally scanned tissue sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. A set of 300 random points was superimposed onto each tumour image. The structure indicated by each point was then categorised as tumour, stroma, vessel or other. The proportions of tumour and vessel points gave the tumour cell density and vessel density respectively. The relative size of the stromal compartment was given by the tumour to stroma ratio. A tissue section was also stained for the T cell marker CD3 by immunohistochemistry. Percentage staining was quantified in three high-density fields using the Nuance imaging system. Results: We were unable to detect any difference between fluorescent and non-fluorescent cancers in terms of tumour cell density (difference in means 3.7%; P = 0.452), vessel density (difference in means 0.17%; P = 0.684), tumour-stroma ratio (difference in mean ratios 0.12; P = 0.934), or T cell count (difference in means 0.92%; P = 0.726). Furthermore, comparisons of the distributions of each variable demonstrated substantial overlap between the fluorescent and non-fluorescent cohorts. Conclusion: The results suggest that tumour and microenvironment structure do not differ between cancers that fluoresce with 5-ALA and those that do not. We therefore propose that the cellular metabolism of 5-ALA is a more likely explanation for differential fluorescence

The purpose of mess in action research: building rigour though a messy turn

Mess and rigour might appear to be strange bedfellows. This paper argues that the purpose of mess is to facilitate a turn towards new constructions of knowing that lead to transformation in practice (an action turn). Engaging in action research - research that can disturb both individual and communally held notions of knowledge for practice - will be messy. Investigations into the 'messy area', the interface between the known and the nearly known, between knowledge in use and tacit knowledge as yet to be useful, reveal the 'messy area' as a vital element for seeing, disrupting, analysing, learning, knowing and changing. It is the place where long-held views shaped by professional knowledge, practical judgement, experience and intuition are seen through other lenses. It is here that reframing takes place and new knowing, which has both theoretical and practical significance, arises: a 'messy turn' takes place

Day differences in the cortisol awakening response predict day differences in synaptic plasticity in the brain

The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is the most prominent, dynamic and variable part of the circadian pattern of cortisol secretion. Despite this its precise purpose is unknown. Aberrant patterns of the CAR are associated with impaired physical and mental health and reduced cognitive function, suggesting that it may have a pervasive role or roles. It has been suggested that the CAR primes the brain for the expected demands of the day but the mechanisms underlying this process are unknown. We examined temporal covariation of the CAR and rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)-induced long term depression (LTD)-like responses in the motor cortex. Plasticity was evaluated across 180 measures from 5 time points on 4 sessions across 9 researcher participants, mean age 25 ± 2.5 years. Plasticity estimates were obtained in the afternoon after measurement of the CAR on 4 days, at least 3 days apart. As both CAR magnitude and rTMS-induced responses are variable across days we hypothesised that days with larger than individual average CARs would be associated with a greater than individual average plasticity response. This was confirmed by mixed regression modelling where variation in the CAR predicted variation in rTMS-induced responses (Df: 1, 148.24; F: 10.41; p=0.002). As the magnitude of the CAR is regulated by the ‘master’ circadian CLOCK, and synaptic plasticity is known to be modulated by peripheral ‘slave’ CLOCK genes, we suggest that the CAR may be a mediator between the master and peripheral circadian systems to entrain daily levels of synaptic plasticity