Determinants and impacts of risk disclosure quality: evidence from China

Purpose Few studies have focused on emerging markets owing to difficulties in identifying the real effect of disclosures on these economies. To fill this gap, this paper investigates the main drivers for risk disclosure quality for Chinese financial firms, and further studies the impact of such disclosure on market liquidity. Design/methodology/approach The sample comprises all financial firms listed in the Shanghai A-shares market for the period 2013-2015. By relying on manual content analysis of annual reports, the risk disclosure quality is measured through a multidimensional approach which encompasses three factors: quantity of disclosure, coverage of disclosure, and the semantic properties of depth and outlook. The findings of this paper are based on ordinary least squares (OLS) and fixed-effects estimations. Findings Our findings suggest that firm characteristics (especially size) influence risk disclosure practices of Chinese financial companies. Furthermore, we found that risk disclosure quality has an impact on market liquidity, and when we analysed each year we noticed that the results were driven by the year 2013; moreover, we noticed no or little significance from the period of the emerging financial crisis. Research limitations/implications The sample of this paper is limited to financial firms in China. The usage of manual content analysis limits our ability to investigate risk reporting drivers and its impact on market liquidity on a large scale. Practical implications The importance of this paper stems from documenting several reporting incentives concerning not only firms’ quantity, but also firms’ quality of risk reporting. Collectively, our findings support activism for reforms and the enhancement of regulations in China in order to make the market more efficient. Originality/value This paper provides new evidence for financial companies in China on the principal drivers for risk disclosure quality and highlights how the quality of such disclosure impacts market liquidity. Furthermore, this paper confirms previous findings on the Chinese market (Ball et al., 2000; Zou and Adams, 2008) in which, given a decreasing but still strong state presence, there is higher stock volatility and weak corporate governance

The value relevance of risk-related disclosure : does the tone of disclosure matter?

202202 bcvcVersion of RecordNot mentionEarly releas

Do IFRS and board of directors’ independence affect accounting conservatism?

This article observes separately and jointly the impact of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) and/or board of directors’ independence on accounting conservatismin FTSE 100 nonfinancial firms between 2002 and 2007. Using Givoly and Hayn’s (2000) accrual-based measure of accounting conservatism, we found a reduction in conservatismafter themandatory adoption of IFRS, and, also, that board of directors’ independence improved accounting conservatism. Moreover, IFRS and board of directors’ independence had a complementary impact on accounting conservatism since the role of independent directors was not observable prior to the mandatory adoption of IFRS. Our results suggest that, after the mandatory adoption of IFRS, independent directors are likely to put significantly more pressure on the management to practice more accounting conservatism

Do social and environmental disclosures impact information asymmetry?

We examine the impact of social and environmental disclosures (SEDs) on information asymmetry. Employing data from 145 banks from 2005 to 2021 across 19 European (EU) countries. Our findings reveal that both SEDs reduce information asymmetry by increasing market liquidity. We further find that the observed impact of such disclosures is more pronounced for banks operating in countries that pay high attention to human development