A longitudinal study on the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs during their first year of life

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The primary aim of this study was to obtain more knowledge about the occurrence of <it>Cryptosporidium </it>and <it>Giardia </it>in young dogs in Norway.</p> <p>The occurrence of these parasites was investigated in a longitudinal study by repeated faecal sampling of dogs between 1 and 12 months of age (litter samples and individual samples). The dogs were privately owned and from four large breeds. Individual faecal samples were collected from 290 dogs from 57 litters when the dogs were approximately 3, 4, 6, and 12 months old. In addition, pooled samples were collected from 43 of the litters, and from 42 of the mother bitches, when the puppies were approximately 1 and/or 2 months old.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The samples were purified by sucrose gradient flotation concentration and examined by immunofluorescent staining.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>128 (44.1%) of the young dogs had one or more <it>Cryptosporidium </it>positive samples, whilst 60 (20.7%) dogs had one or more <it>Giardia </it>positive samples. The prevalence of the parasites varied with age. For <it>Cryptosporidium</it>, the individual prevalence was between 5.1% and 22.5%, with the highest level in dogs < 6 months old, and declining with age. For <it>Giardia</it>, the individual prevalence was between 6.0% and 11.4%, with the highest level in dogs > 6 months old, but the differences between age groups were not statistically significant. Significant differences in prevalences were found in relation to geographic location of the dogs. Both parasites occurred at low prevalences in Northern Norway.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both <it>Cryptosporidium </it>and <it>Giardia </it>are common in Norwegian dogs, with <it>Cryptosporidium </it>more prevalent than <it>Giardia</it>. Prevalences of the parasites were found to be influenced by age, geographical location, and infection status before weaning.</p

Drilling their own graves:How the European oil and gas supermajors avoid sustainability tensions through mythmaking

This study explores how paradoxical tensions between economic growth and environmental protection are avoided through organizational mythmaking. By examining the European oil and gas supermajors’ ‘‘CEOspeak’’ about climate change, we show how mythmaking facilitates the disregarding, diverting, and/or displacing of sustainability tensions. In doing so, our findings further illustrate how certain defensive responses are employed: (1) regression, or retreating to the comforts of past familiarities, (2) fantasy, or escaping the harsh reality that fossil fuels and climate change are indeed irreconcilable, and (3) projecting, or shifting blame to external actors for failing to address climate change. By highlighting the discursive effects of enacting these responses, we illustrate how the European oil and gas supermajors self-determine their inability to substantively address the complexities of climate change. We thus argue that defensive responses are not merely a form of mismanagement as the paradox and corporate sustainability literature commonly suggests, but a strategic resource that poses serious ethical concerns given the imminent danger of issues such as climate change

Enterprise Architecture: A pillar in an integrated framework to measure the Internal Control Effectiveness in the Oil & Gas Sector

International audienc

Enterprise Architecture: A pillar in an integrated framework to measure the Internal Control Effectiveness in the Oil & Gas Sector

International audienc

Enterprise Architecture: A pillar in an integrated framework to measure the Internal Control Effectiveness in the Oil & Gas Sector

International audienc

Dialogism in Corporate Social Responsibility Communications: Conceptualising Verbal Interactions between Organisations and their Audiences

We conceptualise CSR communication as a process of reciprocal influence between organisations and their audiences. We use an illustrative case study in the form of a conflict between firms and a powerful stakeholder which is played out in a series of 20 press releases over a 2-month period to develop a framework of analysis based on insights from linguistics. It focuses on three aspects of dialogism, namely (i) turn-taking (co-operating in a conversation by responding to the other party), (ii) inter-party moves (the nature and type of interaction characterising a turn, i.e. denial, apology or excuse) and (iii) intertextuality (the intensity and quality of verbal interaction between the parties). We address the question: What is the nature and type of verbal interactions between the parties? First we examine (a) whether the parties verbally interact and then (b) whether the parties listen to each other. We find evidence of dialogism suggesting that CSR communication is an interactive process which has to be understood as a function of the power relations between a firm and a specific stakeholder. Also, we find evidence of intertextuality in press releases by six firms which engage in verbal interaction with the stakeholder. We interpret this as linguistic evidence of isomorphic processes relating to CSR practices resulting from the pressure exerted by a powerful stakeholder. The lack of response by ten firms that fail to issue press releases suggests a strategy of ‘watch-and-wait’ with respect to the outcome of the conflict