Antagonistic regulation of Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA rrnB P1 promoter activity by GreA AND DksA.

The Escherichia coli proteins DksA, GreA and GreB are all structural homologs that bind the secondary channel of RNA polymerase (RNAP) but are thought to act at different levels of transcription. DksA, with its co-factor ppGpp, inhibits rrnB P1 transcription initiation while GreA and GreB activate RNAP to cleave backtracked RNA during elongational pausing. Here, in vivo and in vitro evidence reveals antagonistic regulation of rrnB P1 transcription initiation by Gre factors (particularly GreA) and DksA; GreA activates and DksA inhibits. DksA inhibition is epistatic to GreA activation. Both modes of regulation are ppGpp-independent in vivo but DksA inhibition requires ppGpp in vitro. Kinetic experiments and studies of rrnB P1-RNA polymerase complexes suggest that GreA mediates conformational changes at an initiation step in the absence of NTP substrates, even before DksA acts. GreA effects on rrnB P1 open complex conformation reveal a new feature of GreA distinct from its general function in elongation. Our findings support the idea that a balance of the interactions between the three secondary channel binding proteins and RNAP can provide a new mode for regulating transcription

Transcription regulation of the Escherichia coli pcnB gene coding for poly(A) polymerase I: roles of ppGpp, DksA and sigma factors

Poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I), encoded by the pcnB gene, is a major enzyme responsible for RNA polyadenylation in Escherichia coli, a process involved in the global control of gene expression in this bacterium through influencing the rate of transcript degradation. Recent studies have suggested a complicated regulation of pcnB expression, including a complex promoter region, a control at the level of translation initiation and dependence on bacterial growth rate. In this report, studies on transcription regulation of the pcnB gene are described. Results of in vivo and in vitro experiments indicated that (a) there are three σ70-dependent (p1, pB, and p2) and two σS-dependent (pS1 and pS2) promoters of the pcnB gene, (b) guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) and DksA directly inhibit transcription from pB, pS1 and pS2, and (c) pB activity is drastically impaired at the stationary phase of growth. These results indicate that regulation of the pcnB gene transcription is a complex process, which involves several factors acting to ensure precise control of PAP I production. Moreover, inhibition of activities of pS1 and pS2 by ppGpp and DksA suggests that regulation of transcription from promoters requiring alternative σ factors by these effectors of the stringent response might occur according to both passive and active models

DnaA-stimulated transcriptional activation of oriλ: Escherichia coli RNA polymerase β subunit as a transcriptional activator contact site

We present evidence that Escherichia coli RNA polymerase β subunit may be a transcriptional activator contact site. Stimulation of the activity of the p(R) promoter by DnaA protein is necessary for replication of plasmids derived from bacteriophage λ. We found that DnaA activates the p(R) promoter in vitro. Particular mutations in the rpoB gene were able to suppress negative effects that certain dnaA mutations had on the replication of λ plasmids; this suppression was allele-specific. When a potential DnaA-binding sequence located several base pairs downstream of the p(R) promoter was scrambled by in vitro mutagenesis, the p(R) promoter was no longer activated by DnaA both in vivo and in vitro. Therefore, we conclude that DnaA may contact the β subunit of RNA polymerase during activation of the p(R) promoter. A new classification of prokaryotic transcriptional activators is proposed

MOESM1 of Medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates synthesis by Pseudomonas putida KT2440 relA/spoT mutant: bioprocess characterization and transcriptome analysis

Additional file 1: TableS1. Significantly differentially expressed genes in the stationary phase (41 h) with adjusted p-value (Adj. p-value) lower than 0.05. The genes are sorted according to fold-change

The Absence of (p)ppGpp Renders Initiation of Escherichia coli Chromosomal DNA Synthesis Independent of Growth Rates

Bacterial cells regulate their own chromosomal DNA synthesis and cell division depending on the growth conditions, producing more DNA when growing in nutritionally rich media than in poor media (i.e., human gut versus water reservoir). The accumulation of the nucleotide analog (p)ppGpp is usually viewed as serving to warn cells of impending peril due to otherwise lethal sources of stress, which stops growth and inhibits DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis. This work importantly finds that small physiological changes in (p)ppGpp basal levels associated with slow balanced exponential growth incrementally inhibit the intricate process of initiation of chromosomal DNA synthesis. Without (p)ppGpp, initiations mimic the high rates present during fast growth. Here, we report that the effect of (p)ppGpp may be due to the regulation of the expression of gyrase, an important enzyme for the replication of DNA that is a current target of several antibiotics.The initiation of Escherichia coli chromosomal DNA replication starts with the oligomerization of the DnaA protein at repeat sequences within the origin (ori) region. The amount of ori DNA per cell directly correlates with the growth rate. During fast growth, the cell generation time is shorter than the time required for complete DNA replication; therefore, overlapping rounds of chromosome replication are required. Under these circumstances, the ori region DNA abundance exceeds the DNA abundance in the termination (ter) region. Here, high ori/ter ratios are found to persist in (p)ppGpp-deficient [(p)ppGpp0] cells over a wide range of balanced exponential growth rates determined by medium composition. Evidently, (p)ppGpp is necessary to maintain the usual correlation of slow DNA replication initiation with a low growth rate. Conversely, ori/ter ratios are lowered when cell growth is slowed by incrementally increasing even low constitutive basal levels of (p)ppGpp without stress, as if (p)ppGpp alone is sufficient for this response. There are several previous reports of (p)ppGpp inhibition of chromosomal DNA synthesis initiation that occurs with very high levels of (p)ppGpp that stop growth, as during the stringent starvation response or during serine hydroxamate treatment. This work suggests that low physiological levels of (p)ppGpp have significant functions in growing cells without stress through a mechanism involving negative supercoiling, which is likely mediated by (p)ppGpp regulation of DNA gyrase

Properties of RNA polymerase bypass mutants : implications for the role of ppGpp and its co-factor DksA in controlling transcription dependent on sigma54.

The bacterial nutritional and stress alarmone ppGpp and its co-factor DksA directly bind RNA polymerase to regulate its activity at certain sigma70-dependent promoters. A number of promoters that are dependent on alternative sigma-factors function poorly in the absence of ppGpp. These include the Pseudomonas-derived sigma54-dependent Po promoter and several other sigma54-promoters, the transcription from which is essentially abolished in Escherichia coli devoid of ppGpp and DksA. However, ppGpp and DksA have no apparent effect on reconstituted in vitro sigma54-transcription, which suggests an indirect mechanism of control. Here we report analysis of five hyper-suppressor mutants within the beta- and beta'-subunits of core RNA polymerase that allow high levels of transcription from the sigma54-Po promoter in the absence of ppGpp. Using in vitro transcription and competition assays, we present evidence that these core RNA polymerase mutants are defective in one or both of two properties that could combine to explain their hyper-suppressor phenotypes: (i) modulation of competitive association with sigma-factors to favor sigma54-holoenzyme formation over that with sigma70, and (ii) reduced innate stability of RNA polymerase-promoter complexes, which mimics the essential effects of ppGpp and DksA for negative regulation of stringent sigma70-promoters. Both these properties of the mutant holoenzymes support a recently proposed mechanism for regulation of sigma54-transcription that depends on the potent negative effects of ppGpp and DksA on transcription from powerful stringent sigma70-promoters, and suggests that stringent regulation is a key mechanism by which the activity of alternative sigma-factors is controlled to meet cellular requirements