Clinical and ethical challenges in undertaking LIMPRINT in vulnerable populations

Background and study objective: To estimate the prevalence of CO and wounds within two vulnerable populations a male, high security prison in the East Midlands (UK) and residential and nursing homes in the UK and Australia. Methods and results: Methods for screening for chronic oedema (CO) and wounds were adapted from the main LIMPRINT methodology. Prison population. In total, 195 inmates were recruited with 22(11%) having CO. While the majority were white Caucasian (156 / 83.4%) a further 20 (10.7%) were dark skinned with 11 (5.95%) from other minority populations. Co-morbidities included 123 (63%) smokers, 22 (11%) alcohol dependant, 60 (31%) with mental health problems and 35 (18%) a history of self- harm. Only three had a current wound with 30 (16%) having had a traumatic stab wound. Residential and nursing homes (UK and Australia): In the UK, the total population available for inclusion was 189 with only 137(73%) recruited. Seventy two of the 137 (52%) suffered from CO and a further 16 (23%) had a history of cellulitis. Results from the Australian residential care facilities have been published in full. In summary, of the 37 participants 20 (54%) experienced CO with 25 (68%) having co-morbidities and 11 (30%) having a concurrent wound. Conclusion: Obtaining an accurate picture of the prevalence and impact of CO in vulnerable populations is extremely challenging due issues of access and consent. Lack of reliable data for these populations will contribute to poor service provision

Prevalence and risk factors for chronic edema in U.K. community nursing services

Background and study design: Chronic edema (CO) is believed to be a major clinical problem within community nursing services in the UK. This study was undertaken as part of the LIMPRINT international study to determine the number of people with chronic oedema and its impact on health services. Methods and Results: Three urban based community nursing services participated in the UK with prospective evaluation over 4 weeks of all patients receiving nursing care using a questionnaire-based interview and clinical assessment using the LIMPRINT tools. Of the total 2,541 assessed 1,440 (56.7%) were considered to have CO, comprising Leicester City (768/ 1298 (59.2%), Nottingham West (124/ 181 (68.5%)) and Nottingham City (548/1062 (51.6%)). The mean age for women with CO was 78.6 (SD 12.8) years and for men 72.9 (SD14.5). More patients with CO suffered from diabetes (32.1% versus 27.9%, p=0.027), heart failure/ ischaemic heart disease (27.3% versus 14.0%, p<0.001) and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (5.5% versus 1.9%, p<0.001). By far the greatest association was with the presence of a wound (73.6% versus 37.9%, p<0.001). Cellulitis affected 628 (24.7%) and 688 (47.8%) had a concurrent leg ulcer. Rates of reduced mobility (71.6% versus 61.9%) and obesity were higher in those with CO. Six independent factors associated with chronic oedema were service location, age, ethnicity, obesity, heart failure and the presence of a wound. Conclusion: Chronic oedema is a major and growing health care problem within primary care that has been previously unrecognised and requires effective service provision

LIMPRINT: the UK experience - subjective control of swelling in patients attending specialist lymphedema services

Background and study design: This study was undertaken as part of the UK LIMPRINT international study to determine the number of people with chronic oedema and its impact on health services. Overall 7436 with chronic oedema (CO) were recruited in the main UK study from a range of health settings. Methods and results: Subjective control of arm and leg chronic oedema (CO) was defined for patients attending three Lymphoedema services in the UK. Of the total available in the UK dataset 5165 (69.4%)/ 7436(100%) of participants were included. Reasons for exclusions included the following: lack of information (1669), having both arm and leg swelling (272), lack of description of control (5) and professional inability to decide whether CO was controlled (325). Arm swelling occurred in 953 (18.5%), with leg CO in 4212 (81.5%). Poor control was found in 1430 (27.7%) and good control in 3735 (72.3%). Control of arm swelling was worse in men and control increased overall in those aged over 45 years. In contrast control of CO worsened in those with leg CO with increasing age and multiple co-morbidities. Obesity and cellulitis, particularly an episode in the last year were associated with poor control. Independent risk factors for arm CO were obesity, neurological disease and cellulitis in the last year and for leg CO: obesity, poor mobility, heart disease, presence of a wound, cellulitis in the last year and duration of swelling. Conclusion: Control of CO within specialised centres is complex due to sociodemographic and clinical comorbidities