Benchmarking of strength models for unidirectional composites under longitudinal tension

Several modelling approaches are available in the literature to predict longitudinal tensile failure of fibre-reinforced polymers. However, a systematic, blind and unbiased comparison between the predictions from the different models and against experimental data has never been performed. This paper presents a benchmarking exercise performed for three different models from the literature: (i) an analytical hierarchical scaling law for composite fibre bundles, (ii) direct numerical simulations of composite fibre bundles, and (iii) a multiscale finite-element simulation method. The results show that there are significant discrepancies between the predictions of the different modelling approaches for fibre-break density evolution, cluster formation and ultimate strength, and that each of the three models presents unique advantages over the others. Blind model predictions are also compared against detailed computed-tomography experiments, showing that our understanding of the micromechanics of longitudinal tensile failure of composites needs to be developed further

Thermal properties comparison of hybrid CF/FF and BF/FF cyanate ester-based composites

[EN] Insights within thermal expansion, conductivity, and decomposition dependencies with temperature on symmetrical and unsymmetrical layered carbon (CF) or basalt (BF) fabrics in combination with flax fibers (FF) were approached. Driven by commercial application and environmental concerns, the paper draws attention on a modified formula of cyanate ester with a common epoxy resin under an optimized ratio of 70:30 (vol%) as well as on the hybrid reinforcements stacking sequences. Synergetic effects were debated in terms of the CF and BF stacking sequences and corresponding volume fraction followed by comparisons with values predicted by the deployment of hybrid mixtures rules (RoHM/iRoHM). CF hybrid architectures revealed enhanced effective thermophysical properties over their BF counterparts and both over the FF-reinforced polymer composite considered as a reference. Thermal conductivities spread between 0.116 and 0.299 W m-1 K-1 from room temperature up to 250 C on all hybrid specimens, giving rise to an insulator character. Concerning the coefficient of thermal expansion, CF hybrid architectures disclosed values of 1.236 10-6 K-1 and 3.102 10-6 K-1 compared with BF affine exhibiting 4.794 10-6 K-1 and 6.245 10-6 K-1, respectively, with an increase in their volume fraction.The corresponding author gratefully acknowledges the financial assistance of German Academic Exchange Service-DAAD that enabled and supported the internship with Fraunhofer Research Institution for Polymeric Materials and Composites-PYCO, Germany. Many thanks go to Dr. Christian Dreyer and Dr. Maciej Gwiazda for the resin formula and access to the composite manufacturing technology.Motoc, DL.; Ferrándiz Bou, S.; Balart, R. (2018). Thermal properties comparison of hybrid CF/FF and BF/FF cyanate ester-based composites. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 133(1):509-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7222-yS5095181331Assarar M, Zouari W, Sabhi H, Ayad R, Berthelot J-M. Evaluation of the damping of hybrid carbon–flax reinforced composites. Compos Struct. 2015;132:148–54.Duc F, Bourban PE, Plummer CJG, Månson JAE. Damping of thermoset and thermoplastic flax fibre composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2014;64:115–23.Saba N, Jawaid M, Alothman OY, Paridah MT. A review on dynamic mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites. Constr Build Mater. 2016;106:149–59.Tian H, Zhang S, Ge X, Xiang A. Crystallization behaviors and mechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;128(3):1495–504.Alvarez V, Rodriguez E, Vázquez A. Thermaldegradation and decomposition of jute/vinylester composites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;85(2):383–9.Manfredi LB, Rodríguez ES, Wladyka-Przybylak M, Vázquez A. Thermal degradation and fire resistance of unsaturated polyester, modified acrylic resins and their composites with natural fibres. Polym Degrad Stab. 2006;91(2):255–61.Lazko J, Landercy N, Laoutid F, Dangreau L, Huguet MH, Talon O. Flame retardant treatments of insulating agro-materials from flax short fibres. Polym Degrad Stab. 2013;98(5):1043–51.Bar M, Alagirusamy R, Das A. Flame retardant polymer composites. Fibers Polym. 2015;16(4):705–17.Kollia E, Loutas T, Fiamegkou E, Vavouliotis A, Kostopoulos V. Degradation behavior of glass fiber reinforced cyanate ester composites under hydrothermal ageing. Polym Degrad Stab. 2015;121:200–7.Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS. Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review. Carbohyd Polym. 2011;86(1):1–18.Azwa ZN, Yousif BF, Manalo AC, Karunasena W. A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Des. 2013;47:424–42.H-y Cheung, M-p Ho, K-t Lau, Cardona F, Hui D. Natural fibre-reinforced composites for bioengineering and environmental engineering applications. Compos B Eng. 2009;40(7):655–63.Dittenber DB, GangaRao HVS. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2012;43(8):1419–29.Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink H-P, Sain M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(11):1552–96.Praveen RS, Jacob S, Murthy CRL, Balachandran P, Rao YVKS. Hybridization of carbon–glass epoxy composites: an approach to achieve low coefficient of thermal expansion at cryogenic temperatures. Cryogenics. 2011;51(2):95–104.Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS, Alattas OS. Woven hybrid biocomposites: dynamic mechanical and thermal properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2012;43(2):288–93.Swolfs Y, Gorbatikh L, Verpoest I. Fibre hybridisation in polymer composites: a review. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2014;67:181–200.Rojo E, Alonso MV, Oliet M, Del Saz-Orozco B, Rodriguez F. Effect of fiber loading on the properties of treated cellulose fiber-reinforced phenolic composites. Compos B Eng. 2015;68:185–92.LeGault M. Natural fiber composites: market share, one part at the time. Compos World. 2016;5(2):68–75.Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Arora S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2004;35(3):371–6.Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoest I. Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(9):1259–64.Bertomeu D, García-Sanoguera D, Fenollar O, Boronat T, Balart R. Use of eco-friendly epoxy resins from renewable resources as potential substitutes of petrochemical epoxy resins for ambient cured composites with flax reinforcements. Polym Compos. 2012;33(5):683–92.Alam M, Akram D, Sharmin E, Zafar F, Ahmad S. Vegetable oil based eco-friendly coating materials: a review article. Arab J Chem. 2014;7(4):469–79.Bakare FO, Ramamoorthy SK, Åkesson D, Skrifvars M. Thermomechanical properties of bio-based composites made from a lactic acid thermoset resin and flax and flax/basalt fibre reinforcements. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;83:176–84.Pardauil JJR, de Molfetta FA, Braga M, de Souza LKC, Filho GNR, Zamian JR, et al. Characterization, thermal properties and phase transitions of amazonian vegetable oils. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;127(2):1221–9.Głowińska E, Datta J, Parcheta P. Effect of sisal fiber filler on thermal properties of bio-based polyurethane composites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130(1):113–22.Mosiewicki MA, Aranguren MI. A short review on novel biocomposites based on plant oil precursors. Eur Polym J. 2013;49(6):1243–56.Lligadas G, Ronda JC, Galià M, Cádiz V. Renewable polymeric materials from vegetable oils: a perspective. Mater Today. 2013;16(9):337–43.Fombuena V, Sanchez-Nacher L, Samper MD, Juarez D, Balart R. Study of the properties of thermoset materials derived from epoxidized soybean oil and protein fillers. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2013;90(3):449–57.Pil L, Bensadoun F, Pariset J, Verpoest I. Why are designers fascinated by flax and hemp fibre composites? Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;83:193–205.Wooster TJ, Abrol S, Hey JM, MacFarlane DR. Thermal, mechanical, and conductivity properties of cyanate ester composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2004;35(1):75–82.Mallarino S, Chailan JF, Vernet JL. Glass fibre sizing effect on dynamic mechanical properties of cyanate ester composites I. Single frequency investigations. Eur Polym J. 2005;41(8):1804–11.Sothje D, Dreyer C, Bauer M, editors. Advanced possibilities in thermoset recycling. In: The 3rd international conference on thermosets. 2013; Berlin, Germany.Yuan L, Huang S, Gu A, Liang G, Chen F, Hu Y, et al. A cyanate ester/microcapsule system with low cure temperature and self-healing capacity. Compos Sci Technol. 2013;87:111–7.Czigány T. Special manufacturing and characteristics of basalt fiber reinforced hybrid polypropylene composites: mechanical properties and acoustic emission study. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66(16):3210–20.Marom G, Fischer S, Tuler FR, Wagner HD. Hybrid effects in composites: conditions for positive or negative effects versus rule-of-mixtures behaviour. J Mater Sci. 1978;13(7):1419–26.Torquato S. Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties. New York: Springer; 2002.Cherki A-B, Remy B, Khabbazi A, Jannot Y, Baillis D. Experimental thermal properties characterization of insulating cork–gypsum composite. Constr Build Mater. 2014;54:202–9.Bismarck A, Aranberri-Askargorta I, Springer J, Lampke T, Wielage B, Stamboulis A, et al. Surface characterization of flax, hemp and cellulose fibers; Surface properties and the water uptake behavior. Polym Compos. 2002;23(5):872–94.Motoc Luca D, Ferrandiz Bou S, Balart Gimeno R. Effects of fibre orientation and content on the mechanical, dynamic mechanical and thermal expansion properties of multi-layered glass/carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites. J Compos Mater. 2014;49(10):1211–1221.CES EduPack. Granta Design; 2013.Monteiro SN, Calado V, Rodriguez RJS, Margem FM. Thermogravimetric behavior of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites—An overview. Mater Sci Eng, A. 2012;557:17–28

Review of natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites

Natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites which contain one or more types of natural reinforcement are gaining increasing research interest. This paper presents a review of natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites. Both thermoplastic and thermoset composites reinforced by hybrid/synthetic fibres or hybrid/hybrid fibres are reviewed. The properties of natural fibres, the properties and processing of composites are summarised

Topography, stresses, and stability at Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Plane-strain solutions are used to analyze the influence of topography on the state of stress at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. The results are in good agreement with the measured stress components obtained in drill holes by the hydraulic-fracturing technique, particularly those measured directly beneath the crest of the ridge, and indicate that these stresses are gravitationally induced. A separate analysis takes advantage of the fact that a well-developed set of vertical faults and fractures, subparallel to the ridge trend, imparts a vertical transverse isotropy to the rock and that, as a consequence of gravitational loading, unequal horizontal stresses are induced in directions perpendicular and parallel to the anisotropy

Advanced Materials Enabling High-Volume Road Transport Applications of Lightweight Structural Composite Parts

Current applications of carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP) can be found mostly in sectors where their use is not principally cost-driven and which have limited production volumes, such as aerospace and sports cars. In order to achieve a step-change in the application of high-performance composites in larger-volume applications, new materials systems are needed that combine very short production cycle times with performance that meets automotive requirements. The EU-FP 7-project HIVOCOMP is developing two material systems that show unique promise for cost effective, higher-volume production of high performance carbon fibre reinforced parts. These materials systems are: Advanced polyurethane (PU) thermoset matrix materials offering a combination of improved mechanical performance and reduced cycle times in comparison with conventional matrix systems, Thermoplastic PP- and PA6-based self-reinforced polymer composites incorporating continuous carbon fibre reinforcements offering increased toughness and reduced cycle times in comparison to current thermoplastic and thermoset solutions. In this introduction, the global concept of the HIVOCOMP-project is presented, and an overview is given of the achievements during the first three project years. Emphasis is then put on the demonstrators (see figures) and how they show the advantages of both innovative material concepts, both in processing (reduced cycle times) and in properties (increased toughness). Finally, the environmental impact of these new material concepts is evaluated by reporting on the results of the LCA (life cycle assessment) and LCC (life cycle costing) studies