16 research outputs found

    Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli diagnosed by multidetector CT pulmonary angiography.

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: CT Pulmonary Angiography has been shown to be equivalent to Ventilation/ Perfusion scanning in 3-month outcome studies, but it detects more pulmonary emboli. Isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli are thought to account for some of the increase in diagnosis, but it is not known whether these emboli represent a harbinger for future thromboembolic events. The objective of this study was to determine the 3-month clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients diagnosed with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of 10,453 consecutive CTPA radiology reports over 74-month period since the implementation of Multidetector CT Pulmonary Angiography identified a cohort of 93 patients found to have acute pulmonary embolism isolated to subsegmental pulmonary arteries without other evidence of deep venous thrombosis at one institution. The study measured 3-month clinical outcomes (anticoagulation use, recurrence, death, hemorrhage) determined by review of records and telephone interviews with physicians. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (76%) were treated with anticoagulation and/or IVC filter, while 22 (24%) were observed without therapy. One patient (1/93, 1.05%; 95% CI: 0-6.6%) who was treated with anticoagulants and a vena caval filter had a recurrent subsegmental pulmonary embolus. No patients died of pulmonary embolism. There were 8 hemorrhages, including 5 (5.3%) major hemorrhages without any hemorrhage-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli have favorable 3-month outcomes. Short-term prognosis for recurrent thromboembolism may be lower than the risk of adverse events with anticoagulation in patients at high risk of hemorrhage

    A Randomized Pilot Study Assessing if SEDLine Monitoring During Induction of Surgical Patients is Associated With Reduced Dosage of Administered Induction Agents.

    No full text
    Background. Intubations, especially in emergent settings, carry a high risk of hemodynamic instability with potentially catastrophic outcomes. Weight-based dosing of induction drugs can be inappropriately high for elective or emergent intubations and lead to hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that monitoring the patient state index of SEDLine monitors (Masimo, Irvine, CA) would decrease the dose of induction drugs in the operating room during elective intubations.Methods. In this randomized study, SEDLine monitoring was provided to the intervention group but not to the control group during the induction of anesthesia in the operating room. Anesthesia providers in the intervention group were advised to titrate induction drugs to a Patient State Index of \u3c50 before proceeding with intubation. The primary outcome was the induction dose of propofol and etomidate per kilogram normalized to propofol dose equivalents. Secondary outcomes included supplemental doses of ketamine, midazolam, fentanyl, phenylephrine, and ephedrine per kg, time from induction to intubation, administration of additional propofol or vasopressors after induction, mean arterial pressure ā‰„ or \u3c65 mmHg, and lowest mean arterial pressure post-induction.Results. We found no significant difference in propofol equivalents between groups (P = .41). Using a SEDLine decreased the odds that a patient would require vasopressors during induction (odds ratio of .39 [95% confidence interval, .15-.98]).Conclusion. SEDLine monitoring during induction did not decrease dosing of the induction drugs etomidate and propofol but decreased the odds of receiving vasopressors. Further studies are warranted to assess the utility of processed electroencephalography in emergent intubations outside of the operating room

    Surgical Site Infection in Thoracic Surgery Is Not Associated With Perioperative Hypothermia.

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) added the SCIP-Inf-10 measure to mandate that all surgical patients have perioperative temperature management to reduce surgical site infection. While the basis of this measure originated in colorectal surgery, we hypothesized that this would also apply to thoracic surgery patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center pilot study reviewing two years of thoracic surgery cases for the incidence and duration of hypothermia during the operation and surgical site infection occurring within 30 days. Hypothermia was defined as a core temperature of \u3c 36Ā° C. Results: A total of 317 patients were included in the study. Sixty-two percent of patients were identified as hypothermic. The average intraoperative temperature was 35.4Ā°C Ā± 0.8Ā°C in the hypothermic group and 36.4Ā°C Ā± 0.3Ā°C in the normothermic group. There were four surgical site infections in the study with three cases from the CONCLUSION: Perioperative hypothermia was common in thoracic surgery and did not have a negative impact on surgical site infection
    corecore