Clinical evaluation and treatment of phaeochromocytoma

Phaeochromocytoma and extra adrenal paraganglioma are rare neuroendocrine tumours and have the potential to secrete adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine causing a myriad of clinical symptoms. Prompt diagnosis is essential for clinicians and requires a multidisciplinary specialist approach for the clinical and laboratory investigation, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients. This paper is an integrated review of the clinical and laboratory evaluation and treatment of patients suspected to have phaeochromocytoma or paraganglioma, highlighting recent developments and best practices from recent published clinical guidelines.</jats:p

Investigation and assessment of adrenal incidentalomas

With the increasing volume of diagnostic imaging undertaken in an ageing population, adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) are increasingly commonly seen. These masses are most likely to be benign, but a small proportion may be malignant. Similarly, they are usually non-functional, but ∼14% are functional, ie hormone-secreting tumours. Clinical, biochemical and radiological assessment is mandated to stratify patients into those requiring radiological surveillance, medical management or surgical intervention or who can be discharged. Mass characteristics on cross-sectional (CT/MRI) imaging influence the need for radiological surveillance. Functional tumours where excess cortisol, aldosterone or catecholamine are secreted should be excluded, with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) and primary aldosteronism (PA) as the two most common functional states. MACS and PA are associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic disease (eg hypertension, type 2 diabetes) and cardiovascular morbidity/mortality (eg coronary heart disease). Multidisciplinary management is critical for selected cases; the majority of adrenal incidentalomas only require a single assessment

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study

Background Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling. Methods The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty. Results NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year. Conclusion As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population.The aim of this study was to inform vaccination prioritization by modelling the impact of vaccination on elective inpatient surgery. The study found that patients aged at least 70 years needing elective surgery should be prioritized alongside other high-risk groups during early vaccination programmes. Once vaccines are rolled out to younger populations, prioritizing surgical patients is advantageous